AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 213–223

Cultural variations in virtual spaces design

Original Article

Abstract

This paper reports two studies investigating the role of culture on the design and personalisation of virtual spaces. The first study was a systematic analysis of 60 MSN virtual spaces belonging to British and Chinese students. The analysis concentrated on design patterns and communication style. The second study was an on-line survey designed to compare the relative importance of cultural values and personality traits on self-reported behaviour with, and preferences for, virtual space design. Results highlighted the importance of culture on design and communication in virtual spaces. Implications for interaction design are discussed.

References

  1. Banaji M (1994) The self in social contexts. Annu Rev Psychol 45(1):297–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber W, Badre A (1998) Culturability: the merging of culture and usability. In: 4th Conference on human factors and the web. Basking Ridge, New Jersy, 5 June 1998Google Scholar
  3. Blom J, Monk AF (2003) Theory of personalization of appearance: why users personalize their pcs and mobile phones. Hum Comput Interact 18(3):193–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Angeli A, Kyriakoullis L (2006) Globalisation vs. localisation in e-commerce: cultural-aware interaction design, 23–26 May; Venice. ACM, NY, USA, pp 250–253Google Scholar
  5. De Angeli A, Athavankar U, Joshi A et al (2004) Introducing ATMs in India: a contextual inquiry. Interact Comput 16(1):29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dearden AM, Dunckley L, Best, M et al (2007) Socially responsible design in the context of international development. INTERACT (2):694–695Google Scholar
  7. Dong J, Salvendy G (1999) Designing menus for the Chinese population: horizontal or vertical? Behaviour Inf Technol 18(6):467–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Efendioglu AM, Yip VF (2004) Chinese culture and e-commerce: an exploratory study. Interact Comput 16(1):45–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Doubleday/Anchor books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Gutchess AH, Welsh RC, Boduroğlu A (2006) Cultural differences in neural function associated with object processing. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 6(2):102–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hall ET (1976) Beyond culture. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Herring S, Scheidt L, Bonus S et al (2004) Bridging the gap: a genre analysis of weblogs. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii international conference on system science, HICC’04. IEEE press, Big Island, HawaiiGoogle Scholar
  13. Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  14. John OP, Srivastava S (1999) The Big-Five Trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin L, John OP (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research, 2nd edn edn. Guilford, New York, pp 102–138Google Scholar
  15. Johnson JA (1981) The “Self-Disclosure” and “Self-Presentation” views of item response dynamics and personality scale validity. J Pers Soc Psychol 40(4):761–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lampe C, Ellison N, Steinfield C (2007) A familiar Face(book): profile elements as signals in an on-line network. ACM, San Jose, CA, USA, pp 435–444Google Scholar
  17. Lea M (1991) Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making. Int J Man Mach Stud 34(2):283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leary MR (1996) Self-presentation: impression management and interpersonal behavior. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee B-K, Hong J-Y, Lee W-N (2004) How attitude toward the web site influences consumer brand choice and confidence while shopping online. J Comput Mediat Commun 9(2)Google Scholar
  20. Marcus A (2002) User-interface design, culture and the future. In: De Marsico M, Levialdi S, E. Panizzi (eds) Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces (Trento, Italy). ACM, New York, p 15-27Google Scholar
  21. Marcus B, Franz M, Schütz A (2006) Personality in cyberspace: personal Web sites as media for personality expressions and impressions. J Pers Soc Psychol 90(6):1014–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Markus HR, Kitayama S (1991) Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol Rev 98(2):224–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nisbett RE (2003) The geography of thought: how Asians and westerners think differently… and why. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Postmes T, Spears R, Lea M (1998) Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer-mediated communication. Commun Res 26(6):689–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith A, Yetim F (2004) Global human-computer systems: cultural determinants of usability. Interact Comput 16(1):1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sproull L, Kiesler S (1992) Connections: new ways of working in the networked organization. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  27. Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin LW (eds) Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hal, Chigago, pp 7–24Google Scholar
  28. Takaki R (2001) Towards a reformation of Chinese ideographs. Forma 16:289–305Google Scholar
  29. Triandis H (1989) The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychol Rev 96(3):506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turner JC (1987) Rediscovering the social group: a self-categorization theory. Basil Blackwell, Oxford UKGoogle Scholar
  31. Valdez P, Mehrabian A (1994) Effects of color on emotions. J Exp Psychol Gen 123(4):394–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wood AF, Smith MJ (2005) On-line communication, 2nd Edition edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Manchester Business SchoolUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK

Personalised recommendations