Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 173–180 | Cite as

The sudden experience of the computer

  • Robert Rosenberger
Open Forum

Abstract

The experience of computer use can be productively articulated with concepts developed in the phenomenological tradition of philosophy. Building on the insights of classical phenomenologists, Ihde has advanced a sophisticated view of the ways humans relate to technology. I review and expand on his notions of “technological mediation,” “embodiment,” and “multistability,” and apply them to the experience of computer interface. In particular, I explore the experience of using a computer that fails to work properly. A revealing example is the experience of a user who suddenly and unexpectedly encounters a slowly-loading webpage while using the Internet. This phenomenological framework provides an account of the ways a suddenly failing technology changes our relationships to the device, to the world, and to ourselves, and it also suggests how this experience can be usefully reconceptualized.

Keywords

Relational Strategy Pave Road Magnify Glass Strategy Shift Phenomenological Perspective 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to Don Ihde, Annie Roach, and Arun Kumar Tripathi for comments on earlier drafts of this piece.

References

  1. Banerjee P (2004) Aesthetics of navigational performance in hypertext. AI Soc 18:297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bødker S, Anderson PB (2005) Complex mediation. Hum Comp Interact 20:353–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dreyfus H (2001) On the Internet. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Eason R (2003) Hypertext: Rortean links between Ihde and Haraway. In: Ihde D, Selinger E (eds) Chasing technoscience: matrix for materiality. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 67–181Google Scholar
  5. Fallman D (2003) Mediated reality through glasses or binoculars? Exploring use models of wearable computing in the context of aircraft maintenance. Int J Hum Comp Interact 15(2):265–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fallman D (2007) Persuade into what? Why human–computer interaction needs a philosophy of technology. LNCS 4744:295–306Google Scholar
  7. Forss A (2005) At the margins of health and normality: women’s encounters with biomedical technology in the realm of cervical cancer screening. Repro Print AB, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  8. Hasse C (2006) Learning through reactions—the social designation of institutional code curricula. In: Sørensen CH (ed) Body and learning: a transdisciplinary approach. The Danish University of Education Press, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  9. Heidegger M (1953) Being and time, translated by J Stambaugh, 1996. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  10. Husserl E (1970) Logical investigations. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hybs I (1996) Beyond the interface: a phenomenological view of computer systems design. Leonardo 29(3):215–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ihde D (1990) Technology and the lifeworld. Indiana University Press, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Ihde D (1993) Postphenomenology: essays in the postmodern context. Northwestern University Press, EvanstonGoogle Scholar
  14. Ihde D (1999) Technology and prognostic predicaments. AI Soc 13:44–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ihde D (2003) If phenomenology is an albatross, is post-phenomenology possible? In: Ihde D, Selinger E (eds) Chasing technoscience: matrix for materiality. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 15–26Google Scholar
  16. Ihde D (2009) Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking lectures. State University of New York Press, Albany (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  17. Jensen CB (2001) CSCW design reconceptualized through science studies. AI Soc 15:200–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kockelkoren P (ed) (2007) Mediated vision. Veenman Publishers and ArtEZ Press, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  19. Latour B (1994) On technological mediation: philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowl 3:29–64Google Scholar
  20. Lynch M (1985) Art and artifact in laboratory science. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Norman D (1998) The invisible computer. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Rasmussen N (1997) Picture control: the electron microscope and the transformation of biology in America, 1940–1960. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosenberger R (2007) The phenomenology of slowly-loading webpages. Ubiquity 8(15)Google Scholar
  24. Rosenberger R (2008a) Perceiving other planets: bodily experience, interpretation, and the Mars Orbiter Camera. Hum Stud 31(1): 63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosenberger R (2008b) Quick-freezing philosophy: an analysis of imaging technologies in neurobiology. In: Olsen JKB, Selinger E, Riis S (eds) New waves in philosophy of technology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 65–82Google Scholar
  26. Rosenberger R (2009a) A case study in the applied philosophy of imaging: the synaptic vesicle debate. Sci Technol Hum Values (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  27. Rosenberger R (2009b) The habits of computer use. Int J Comput Inf Technol 1(1):1–9Google Scholar
  28. Russell DM, Streitz NA, Winograd T (2005) Building disappearing computers. Comm ACM 48(3):42–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scharff RC (2006) Ihde’s albatross: sticking to a “phenomenology” of technoscientific experience. In: Selinger E (ed) Postphenomenology: a critical companion to Ihde. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 131–144Google Scholar
  30. Selinger E (2009a) Embodying technoscience. Automatic/VIP Press (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  31. Selinger E (2009b) Towards a reflexive framework for development: Technology transfer after the empirical turn. Synthese (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  32. Suchman L (2007) Human–machine reconfigurations: plans and situated actions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Verbeek PP (2005) What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design, translated by R P Crease. Pennsylvania State University Press, State CollegeGoogle Scholar
  34. Verbeek PP (2006) Materializing morality: design ethics and technological mediation. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(3):361–380CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the twenty-first century. Sci Am 94–100Google Scholar
  36. Winograd T (1995) Heidegger and the design of computer systems. In: Feenberg A, Hannay A (eds) Technology and the politics of knowledge. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp 108–127Google Scholar
  37. Winograd T, Flores F (1986) Understanding computers and cognition: a new foundation for design. Addison Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stony Brook UniversityStony BrookUSA

Personalised recommendations