AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 197–210 | Cite as

Experiment in social intelligence design

OPEN FORUM

Abstract

In this paper we present recent research into computer-mediated communication with special emphasis on the use of collaborative tools in shared task environment. In order to explain the regularities and uniformities in people’s behaviour obtained through quantitative study of interaction among groups of students engaged in structured debates, we have developed an experimental approach that enables us to measure and quantify several key aspects of computer-mediated communication in this context.

References

  1. Clark HH (1992) Arenas of language use. CSLI, UCPGoogle Scholar
  2. Clark HH, Brennan SE (1991) Grounding in communication. In: Resnick LB, Levine J, Teasley SD (eds) Perspectives on socially shared cognition. APA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Corbel A, Girardot JJ, Jaillon P (2002) DREW: a dialogical reasoning Web tool. ICTE 2002, International conference on ICT in educationGoogle Scholar
  4. Cornillon J, Rosenberg D (2005) Dialogue organisation in argumentative debates. AI Soc 19:48–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fruchter R (1997) The A/E/C virtual atelier: experience and future directions. In: Adams T (ed) Proceedings of ASCE 4th congress of computing in civil engineering, Philadelphia, pp 395–402Google Scholar
  6. Garrod S, Anderson A (1987) Saying what you mean in dialogue: a study in conceptual and semantic coordination. Cognition 27:181–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hinds PJ, Bailey DE (2003) Out of sight, out of sync: understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organ Sci 14:615–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goffman E (1974) Frame analysis. Harvard UP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Jermann P (1997) Semi-structured interface in collaborative problem solving. In: Proceedings of 6èmes Rencontres Scientifiques du Corps Intermédiaire de Psychologie, UNIGE-FPSEGoogle Scholar
  10. Kendon A (1990) Conducting interaction: patterns of behavior in focused encounters. In: Gumperz J (ed) Studies in interactional sociolinguistics. CUP, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Kirsh D (1996) Adapting the environment instead of oneself. Adapt Behav 4:415–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mark G, Deflorio P (2001) HDTV: a challenge to traditional video conferencing? SID 2001Google Scholar
  13. Montgomery D (1997) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, LondonMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Perry M, Fruchter R, Rosenberg D (2000) Co-ordinating distributed knowledge: an investigation into the use of an organisational memory. Cognit Technol Work Int J Anal Des Use Joint Cognit Syst 1:142–152Google Scholar
  15. Pickering M, Branigan HP (1999) Syntactic priming in language production. Trends Cognit Sci 3:136–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rosenberg D (2000) Language in multi-media. In: Proceedings of CHI2000: Natural language and human–computer interactionGoogle Scholar
  17. Sonnenwald DH, Whitton MC, Maglaughlin KL (2003) Evaluating a scientific collaboratory: results of a controlled experiment. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 10:151–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Walker M, Whittaker S (1990) Mixed initiative in dialogue: an investigation into discourse segmentation. In: Proceedings of the ACL, pp 70–78Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Management, Royal HollowayUniversity of LondonEghamEngland

Personalised recommendations