AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 565–582

Machine morality: bottom-up and top-down approaches for modelling human moral faculties

Original Article

Abstract

The implementation of moral decision making abilities in artificial intelligence (AI) is a natural and necessary extension to the social mechanisms of autonomous software agents and robots. Engineers exploring design strategies for systems sensitive to moral considerations in their choices and actions will need to determine what role ethical theory should play in defining control architectures for such systems. The architectures for morally intelligent agents fall within two broad approaches: the top-down imposition of ethical theories, and the bottom-up building of systems that aim at goals or standards which may or may not be specified in explicitly theoretical terms. In this paper we wish to provide some direction for continued research by outlining the value and limitations inherent in each of these approaches.

References

  1. Aleksander I, Dunmall B (2003) Axioms and tests for the presence of minimal consciousness in agents. J Conscious Stud 10(4–5):7–18Google Scholar
  2. Aleksander I, Lahstein M, Lee R (2005) Will and emotions: A machine model that shuns illusion. In: Chrisley R, Clowes R, Torrance S (eds) Next generation approaches to machine consciousness: imagination, development, intersubjectivity, and embodiment. In: Proceedings of an AISB 2005 Workshop. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, pp 110–117Google Scholar
  3. Allen C, Varner G, Zinser J (2000) Prolegomena to any future artificial moral agent. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 12:251–261MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen C (2002) Calculated morality: ethical computing in the limit. In: Smit I, Lasker G (eds) Cognitive, emotive and ethical aspects of decision making and human action, vol I. IIAS, Windsor, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  5. Asimov I (1950) I robot. Gnome Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  6. Churchland PM (1995) The engine of reason, the seat of the soul: a philosophical journey into the brain. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark A (1998) Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke R (1993, 1994) Asimov’s laws of robotics: Implications for information technology. Published in two parts, in IEEE Computer 26, 12 53–61 and 27, 1, 57–66Google Scholar
  9. Damasio A (1995) Descartes’ error. Pan Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. DeMoss D (1998) Aristotle, connectionism, and the morally excellent brain. In: Proceedings of the 20th world congress of philosophy. The Paideia Archive, available at http://www.bu.edu/wcp/Papers/Cogn/CognDemo.htm
  11. Friedman B, Kahn P (1992) Human agency and responsible computing. J Syst Softw 17:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedman B, Nissenbaum H (1996) Bias in computer systems. ACM Trans Inf Syst 14:330–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gips J (1995) Towards the ethical robot. In: Ford K, Glymour C, Hayes P (eds) Android epistemology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA pp 243–252Google Scholar
  14. Goleman D (1995) Emotional intelligence. Bantam Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsiao K, Roy D (2005) A habit system for an interactive robot. In: AAAI fall symposium 2005: from reactive to anticipatory cognitive embodied systems. available at http://www.media.mit.edu/cogmac/publications/habit_system_aaaifs_05.pdf
  16. Hursthouse R (2003) “Virtue ethics”. The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. In: Edward N Zalta (ed) available at http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2003/entries/ethics-virtue/
  17. Lang C (2002) Ethics for artificial intelligence. available at http://philosophy.wisc.edu/lang/AIEthics/index.htm
  18. Picard R (1997) Affective computing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  19. Roy D (2005) Semiotic schemas: a framework for grounding language in the action and perception. Artif Intell 167(1–2):170–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Scassellati B (2001) Foundations for a theory of mind for a humanoid robot. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, available at http://www.ai.mit.edu/projects/lbr/hrg/2001/scassellati-phd.pdf
  21. Smith T, Husbands P, Philippides A (2002) Neuronal plasticity and temporal adaptivity: GasNet robot control networks. Adapt Behav 10:161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wallach W (2003). Robot morals and human ethics. In: Smit I, Lasker G, Wallach W (eds) Cognitive, emotive and ethical aspects of decision making in humans and in artificial intelligence, vol II. IIAS, Windsor, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  23. Wallach W (2004) Artificial morality: bounded rationality, bounded morality and emotions. In: Smit I, Lasker L, Wallach W (eds) Cognitive, emotive and ethical aspects of decision making and human action, vol III. IIAS, Windsor, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  24. Williams B (1985) Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ISPS, Interdisciplinary Center for BioethicsYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of History and Philosophy of ScienceIndiana UniversityBloomingtonUSA
  3. 3.E&E ConsultantsAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations