AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 287–302 | Cite as

Evaluating non-business e-commerce adoption decision processes and gender roles

ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 258 Downloads

Abstract

Non-business e-commerce adoption refers to the use of e-commerce by not-for profit organizations such as religious organizations, government agencies and academic institutions to reduce their expenses or to improve their operations and customer service. Being a new research niche in the field of e-commerce, non-business e-commerce has received very little or no research attention. This has resulted in a very poor understanding of this niche, especially with regards to its adoption facilitators and inhibitors. Based on this impetus, a field survey of Malaysian Universities was conducted to determine the key factors that facilitate non-business EC adoption as well as the role of gender differential. A comprehensive list of potential facilitators for the strategic use of information technology was derived from extant research reports and used to collect data from five public universities in Malaysia. The data were factor-analysed to determine the key underlying dimensions of facilitators. On the basis of the resulting five dimensions namely, relative advantage orientation, network orientation, information efficiency orientation, innovativeness orientation and competitiveness orientation, regression analysis was done to determine the impact of the five dimensions on adoption. Dummy variable was created for gender and applied in the regression analysis in order to estimate the moderation effect of sex typing on the relationship between the resulting dimensions and adoption. Implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Non-business e-commerce Non-profit organizations Gender Malaysia 

References

  1. Amit R, Zott C (2000) Value creation in e-business. Strateg Manage J 22:493–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson CR, Paine FT (1975) Managerial perceptions and strategic behavior. Acad Manage J 18(4):811–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong G, Kotler P (2003) Marketing an introduction. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  4. Barnett RC, Marshall NL (1991) The relationship between women’s work and family roles and their subjective well-being and psychological distress. In: Frankenhaeuser M, Lunberg V, Chesney MA (eds) Women work and health: stress and opportunities, Plenum, New York, pp 111–136Google Scholar
  5. Beath CM, Ives B (1988) The information technology champion: aiding and abetting, care and feeding. In: Proceeding of the 21st annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, vol 4, pp 115–123Google Scholar
  6. Bozionelos N (1996) Psychology of computer use: XXXIX. Prevalence of computer anxiety in British managers and professionals. Psychol Rep 78(3):995–1002Google Scholar
  7. Chen M (1985) Gender differences in adolescent’s uses of and attitudes toward computers. In: McLaughlan M (ed) Communication yearbook, 10. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, pp 200–216Google Scholar
  8. Clemons EK (1986) Information systems for sustainable competitive advantage. Inf Manage 9(3):131–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Copeland DG, McKenney JL (1988) Airline reservations systems: lessons from history. MIS Q 12(3):353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cragg PB, King M (1993) Small firm computing: motivators and inhibitors. MIS Q 17(1):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dawson LM (1995) Women and men. Morality and ethics. Bus Horiz 38:61–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deaux K (1985) Sex differences. In: Rosenzweig MR, Porter LW (eds) Annual review of psychology, vol 26, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, pp 48–82Google Scholar
  13. Dos Santos BL, Peffers K, Mauer DC (1983) The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Inf Syst Res 4(1):1–23Google Scholar
  14. Eagly AH, Johnson BT (1990) Gender and leadership style: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 108:233–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans P, Wurster TS (1999) Getting real about virtual commerce. Harv Bus Rev 77:85–94Google Scholar
  16. Felter M (1985) Sex differences on the California statewide assessment of computer literacy. Sex Roles 13:181–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Franke GR, Crown DF, Spake DF (1997) Gender differences in ethical perceptions of business practices: a social role theory perspective. J Appl Psychol 82:920–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galbraith S, Stephenson HB (1993) Decision rules used by male and female business students in ethical value judgements. J Bus Ethics 12:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gianakos I, Subich LM (1988) Student sex and sex role in relation to college major choice. Career Dev Q 36:259–268Google Scholar
  20. Gill S, Stockard J, Johnson M, William S (1987) Measuring gender differences: the expressive dimensions and critique of androgyny scales. Sex Roles 17:375–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gurbaxani V, King JL, Kraemer KL, McFarlan FW, Raman KS, Yap CS (1990) Institutions and the international diffusion of information technology. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on information systems, pp 87–98Google Scholar
  22. Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1995) Multivariate data analysis, 4th edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  23. Hair JF Jr, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC (1998) Multivariate data analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Inc, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  24. Helgesen S (1990) The female advantage: women’s ways of leadership. Doubleday, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Hennig M, Jardim A (1977) The managerial woman. Anchor Press, Garden CityGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffman LW (1972) Early childhood experiences and women’s achievement motives. J Soc Issues 28(2):129–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ICOLC – International Coalition of Library Consortia (1998) Guidelines for statistical measures of usage of web-based indexes. http://www.library.yale.edu/consortia/webstats.html
  28. Ives B, Learmonth GP (1984) The information system as a competitive weapon. Commun ACM 27:1193–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jantan M, Ndubisi NO, Ong BY (2003) Viability of e-commerce as an alternative distribution channel. Logist Inf Manage 16(6):427–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jarvenpa SL, Ives B (1990) Information technology and corporate strategy: a view from the top. Inf Syst Res 1(4):351–376Google Scholar
  31. Jarvenpa SL, Ives B (1991) Executive involvement and participation in the management of information technology. MIS Q 15(2):205–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnston HR, Carrico SR (1988) Developing capabilities to use information strategically. MIS Q 12(1):37–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kamel S (1995) Information superhighways—a potential for socioeconomic and cultural development. In: Proceedings of the 6th international IRMA conference, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  34. Kantrowitz B, Wingert P, Robins K (1989) Advocating a mommy track. Newsweek, March 13, pp 45Google Scholar
  35. Kauffman R, Wang B (2001) In: Lowry P, Cherrington JOC, Waston PR (eds) Handbook for electronic commerce in business and society. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 27–28Google Scholar
  36. King WR, Sabherwal R (1992) The factors affecting strategic information systems applications. Inf Manage 23:217–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. King WR, Teo TSH (1994) Facilitators and inhibitors for the strategic use of information technology. Inf Manage 27:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. King WR, Teo TSH (1996) Key dimensions of facilitators and inhibitors for the strategic use of information technology. J Manage Inf Syst 12(4):35–53Google Scholar
  39. King WR, Grover V, Hufnagel EH (1989) Using information and information technology for sustainable competitive advantage: some empirical evidence. Inf Manage 17:87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Klein L, Quelch JA (1996) The internet and international marketing. Sloan Manage Rev 37(3):60–75Google Scholar
  41. Kring AM, Gordon AH (1998) Sex differences in emotion: expression, experience, and physiology. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:686–703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Landauer TK (1995) The trouble with computers: usefulness, usability, and productivity. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  43. Laudon KC, Laudon JP (1997) Essentials of management information systems: organisation and technology. Prentice Hall International Inc, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  44. Leigh JP (1983) Sex differences in absenteeism. Ind Relat 22(3):349–361Google Scholar
  45. Madura J (2004) Introduction to business. Thomson South-Western, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  46. Minton HL, Schneider FW (1980) Differential psychology, prospect heights. Waveland Press, Prospect HeightsGoogle Scholar
  47. Morrow PC, Presll ER, McElroy JC (1986) Attitudinal and behavioral correlates of computer anxiety. Psychol Rep 59:1199–1204Google Scholar
  48. Ndubisi NO (2003) Women entrepreneurs and IT usage: the impact of traits. J Bus Dev Nations 7:111–147Google Scholar
  49. Ndubisi NO, Jantan M (2003) Malaysian entrepreneurs and strategic use of information technology. Malays Manage Rev 38(1):32–42Google Scholar
  50. Ndubisi NO, Gupta OK, Massoud S (2003) Organisational learning and vendor support quality by the usage of application software packages: a study of Asian entrepreneurs. J Syst Sci Syst Eng 12(3):314–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Neo BS (1988) Factors facilitating the use of information technology for competitive advantage: an exploratory study. Inf Manage 15:191–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nilakanta S, Scamell RW (1990) The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment. Manage Sci 36(1):24–40Google Scholar
  53. O’Niel JM (1982) Gender-role conflict and strain in men’s lives: implications for psychiatrists, psychologists, and other human service providers. In: Solomon K, Levy NB (eds) Men in transition: theory and therapy, Plenum, New York, pp 5–44Google Scholar
  54. Porter ME, Miller VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harv Bus Rev 63(4):149–161Google Scholar
  55. Powell M, Ansic D (1997) Gender differences in risk behavioral in financial decision-making: an experimental analysis. J Econ Psychol 18:605–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rayport JF, Sviokla JJ (1994) Managing in the marketspace. Harv Bus Rev 72(6):141–150Google Scholar
  57. Reich BH, Benbasat I (1990) An empirical investigation of factors influencing the success of customer-oriented strategic systems. Inf Syst Res 1(3):325–347Google Scholar
  58. Richardson S, Ndubisi NO (2003) Strategic level systems in decision-making by entrepreneurs: the antecedents of systems usage. J Bus Dev Nations 7:75–109Google Scholar
  59. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovation. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. Rosener JB (1990) Ways women lead. Harv Bus Rev 68:119–125Google Scholar
  61. Rosenkrantz P, Vogel P, Bee H, Broverman I, Broverman DM (1968) Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. J Consult Clin Psychol 32:287–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rotter GS, Portugal SM (1969) Group and individual effects in problem solving. J Appl Psychol 53:338–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sargent A (1981) The androgynous manager. AMACOM, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Scott KD, McClellan EL (1990) Gender differences in absenteeism. Public Pers Manage 19(2):229–253Google Scholar
  65. Shellenbarger S (1991) More job seekers put family needs first. Wall Street J 15:B1Google Scholar
  66. Sichel DE (1997) The computer revolution: an economic perspective. The Brookings Institution, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  67. Simonin BL (1999) Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strateg Manage J 20:595–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Steffen TM, Nystrom PC (1988) Problem solving by hospital managers. Health Care Manage Rev 13:25–32Google Scholar
  69. Stock JR, Lambert DM (2001) Strategic logistics management. McGraw-Hill Higher Education, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  70. Sullivan L (2001) Mouser consolidating operations—new headquarters equipped with latest networking infrastructure. EBN 1277:44–45Google Scholar
  71. Talaga JA, Beehr TA (1995) Are there gender differences in predicting retirement decisions? J Appl Psychol 80:16–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tannen D (1995) Talking from 9 to 5. William Morrow, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  73. Tashakkori A (1993) Gender, ethnicity, and the structure of self-esteem: an attitude theory approach. J Soc Psychol 133:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turban E, Lee J, King D, Chung HM (2000) Electronic commerce: a managerial perspective. Prentice Hall Inter, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  75. Van Hooft FPC, Stegwee RA (2001) E-business strategy: how to benefit from the hype. Logist Inf Manage 14(1/2):44–54Google Scholar
  76. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Ackerman PL (2000) A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision making process. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 83:33–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Weill P, Vitale MR (2001) Place to space—migrating to e-business models. HBS Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  78. Wilson JS, Stocking VB, Goldstein D (1994) Gender differences in motivations for course selection: academically talented students in an intensive summer program. Sex Roles 31:349–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zmud RW (1984) An examination of “push–pull” theory applied to process innovation in knowledge work. Manage Sci 30(6):727–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsMonash University MalaysiaPetaling Jaya, SelangorMalaysia

Personalised recommendations