AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 229–249 | Cite as

The narrative aspect of scenario building - How story telling may give people a memory of the future

Original Article

Abstract

Scenarios are flexible means to integrate disparate ideas, thoughts and feelings into holistic images, providing the context and meaning of possible futures. The application of narrative scenarios in engineering, development of socio-technical systems or communities provides an important link between general ideas and specification of technical system requirements. They focus on how people use systems through context-related storytelling rather than abstract descriptions of requirements. The quality of scenarios depends on relevant assumptions and authentic scenario stories. In this article, we will explore how the narrative approach may enrich the scenario ‘skeleton’ with ‘flesh and blood’, that is, living, detailed and consistent storytelling. In addition, criteria are suggested for evaluation of the quality of scenario storytelling.

Keywords

Scenario stories Narrative approach Story-telling techniques Socio-technical systems Community strategy formation 

References

  1. Alexander IF (2004) Introduction: scenarios in system development. In: Alexander IF, Maiden N (eds) Scenarios, stories, use cases–through the system development life-style. Wiley, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander IF, Maiden N (eds) (2004) Scenarios, stories, use cases–through the system development life-style. Wiley, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Allan J, Fairtlough G, Heinesen B (2002) The power of the tale–using narratives for organisational success. Wiley, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Boje DM (2002) Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. Sage Publications, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown JS, Denning S, Groh K, Prusak L (2004) Storytelling in organizations—Why Storytelling is transforming 21st century organizations and management. Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, USGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll J (1995) Scenario-based design, envisioning, work and technology in system development. Wiley, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Corbett JM, Rasmussen LB, Rauner F (1991) Crossing the border–the social and engineering design of computer integrated manufacturing systems. Springer Verlag, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Denning S (2001) The springboard: how storytelling ignites action in knowledge-era organizations. Butterworth Heineman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Derrida J (1978) Writing and difference. University of Chicago press, USGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault M (1977/79) Discipline and punish. Translated from the 1977 French by Allan Sheridan. Vintage Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Gabriel Y (2001) Storytelling in organizations–facts, fictions and fantasies. Oxford University press, UKGoogle Scholar
  12. van der Heiden K, Bradfield R, Burt G, Cains G, Wright G (2002) The sixth sense. Accelerating organizational learning with scenarios. Wiley,ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  13. van der Heijden K (2004/1996) Scenarios: the art and practice of the learning organisation. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  14. Houdek F, Zink T (2004) Story use and reuse in automotive systems engineering. In: Alexander IF, Maiden N (eds) Scenarios, stories, use cases–through the system development life-style. Wiley, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson B (2000) A story is a promise. Blue haven publishing, OregonGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindgren M, Bandhold H (2003) Scenario planning the link between future and strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Moore S (2000) Analyzing strategic activity through narrative analysis. In: Flood PC, Dromgoole T, Carroll SJ, Germen L (eds) Managing strategy implementation. Blackwell Publishers, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Nielsen KS (2004) Stories in organisations–narrative practice (In Danish). Gyldendal, DKGoogle Scholar
  19. Rasmussen LB (2002) Identity building in organisations: proactive capability development. AI Soc 16:377–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rasmussen LB (2003) Action research toolkit II: the scenario workshop. In: Brandt D (ed) Navigating innovations—Indo-European cross-cultural experiences. India Research Press, New Delhi, India, pp 241–258Google Scholar
  21. Rasmussen LB (2004a) Action research—Scandinavian experiences. AI Soc 18:21–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rasmussen LB (2004b) Sustainable entrepreneurship and quality of work. In: Garibaldo F, Telljohann V (eds) Globalisation, company strategies and quality of working life in Europe. Peter Lang, Europäische Verlag der Wissenschaften, Germany, pp 251–278Google Scholar
  23. Ricoeur P (1984) Time and narrative, vol I. University of Chicago press, USGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwartz P (1992) Composing a plot for your scenario. Plan Rev 20(3):4–9Google Scholar
  25. Shaw G, Brown R, Bromiley P (1998) Strategic stories: how 3M is rewriting business planning. Har Bus Rev 76(3):3–8Google Scholar
  26. Waller SE (2003) Story-telling and community visioning- tools for sustainability background paper for the state sustainability strategy, sustainability policy unit, Department for the Premier and Casinet, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  27. Weick KE (1995) Sensemaking in organizations. Sage Publications Thousand Oaks, USGoogle Scholar
  28. Weick KE (2001) Making sense of the organization. Blackwell Publishing, USGoogle Scholar
  29. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice—learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University press, UKGoogle Scholar
  30. White M (2000) Reflections on narrative practice—essays & interviews. Dulwich Centre Publications, South AustraliaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Manufacturing Engineering and ManagementTechnical University of DemarkLyngbyDemark

Personalised recommendations