Advertisement

AI & SOCIETY

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 364–381 | Cite as

Intelligent agents as innovations

  • Alexander SerenkoEmail author
  • Brian Detlor
Open Forum

Abstract

This paper explores the treatment of intelligent agents as innovations. Past writings in the area of intelligent agents focus on the technical merits and internal workings of agent-based solutions. By adopting a perspective on agents from an innovations point of view, a new and novel description of agents is put forth in terms of their degrees of innovativeness, competitive implications, and perceived characteristics. To facilitate this description, a series of innovation-based theoretical models are utilized as a lens of analysis, namely Kleinschmidt and Cooper’s (J Prod Innovation Manage 8:240–251, 1991) market and technological newness map, Abernathy and Clark’s (Res Policy 14:3–22, 1985) competitive implications framework, and Moore and Benbasat’s (Inf Syst Res 2:192–222, 1991) list of perceived innovating characteristics. Together, these models provide a theoretical foundation by which to describe intelligent agents, yielding new insights and perceptions on this relatively new form of software application.

Keywords

Diffusion of innovations Innovation Intelligent agents 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is kindly supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

References

  1. Abernathy WJ, Clark KB (1985) Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction. Res Policy 14:3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal R, Prasad J (1997) The role of innovation characteristics and perceived voluntariness in the acceptance of information technologies. Decis Sci 28:557–582Google Scholar
  3. Agarwal R, Prasad J (1998) A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Inf Syst Res 9:204–215Google Scholar
  4. Agarwal R, Tanniru M, Wilemon D (1997) Assimilating information technology innovations: strategies and moderating influences. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 44:347–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen JP (2000) Information systems as technological innovation. Inf Technol People 13:210–221Google Scholar
  7. Astebro T (1995) The effect of management and social interaction on the intra-firm diffusion of electronic mail systems. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 42:319–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bass FM (1969) A new product growth model for consumer durables. Manage Sci 15:215–227Google Scholar
  9. Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc (1982) New product management for the 1980s. Booz, Allen and Hamilton Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Chandy RK, Tellis GJ (2000) The incumbent’s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. J Marketing 64:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davenport E, Bruce I (2002) Innovation, knowledge management and the use of space: questioning assumptions about non-traditional office work. J Inf Sci 28:225–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319–340Google Scholar
  13. Descouza KC (2001) Intelligent agents for competitive intelligence: survey of applications. Competitive Intell Rev 12:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Detlor B (2004) Towards knowledge portals: from human issues to intelligent agents. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  15. DStar (2001) SAP/BiosGroup team to solve supply network complexity. Available at http://www.hpcwire.com/dsstar/01/0619/103169.html. Retrieved March 2004
  16. Etzioni O, Weld DS (1995) Intelligent agents on the Internet: fact, fiction, and forecast. IEEE Expert 10:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman C (1991) The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system. In: OECD (ed) Technology and productivity—the challenge for economic policy. OECD, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia R, Calantone R (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. J Prod Innovation Manage 19:110–132Google Scholar
  20. Garrido L, Sycara K (1996) Multi-agent meeting scheduling: preliminary results. In: Proceedings of the international conference on multi-agent systems (ICMAS‘96), Kyoto, Japan, December 1996, pp 95–102Google Scholar
  21. Gilbert D, Aparicio M, Atkinson B, Brady S, Ciccarino J, Grosof B, O’Connor P, Osisek D, Pritko S, Spagna R, Wilson L (1995) IBM intelligent agent strategy. White paper, IBM CorporationGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall R, Andriani P (2002) Managing knowledge for innovation. Long Range Plann 35:29–48CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayes-Roth B (1995) An architecture for adaptive intelligent systems. Artif Intell 72:329–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jennings NR, Norman TJ, Faratin P, O’Brien P, Odgers B (2000) Autonomous agents for business process management. Int J Appl Artif Intell 14:145–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kleinschmidt EJ, Cooper RG (1991) The impact of product innovativeness on performance. J Prod Innovation Manage 8:240–251Google Scholar
  26. Lange DB, Oshima M (1999) Seven good reasons for mobile agents. Commun ACM 42:88–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lieberman H (1995) Letizia: an agent that assists Web browsing. In: Proceedings of the international joint conference on artificial intelligence (IJCAI’95), Montreal, Canada, August 1995, pp 924–929Google Scholar
  28. Lieberman H, Rosenzweig E, Singh P (2001) Aria: an agent for annotating and retrieving images. IEEE Comput 34:57–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maes P (1994) Agents that reduce work and information overload. Commun ACM 37:31–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maes P (1999) Smart commerce: the future of intelligent agents in cyberspace. J Interactive Marketing 13:66–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Maes P, Kozierok R (1993) Learning interface agents. In: Proceedings of the 11th national conference on artificial intelligence (AAAI’93), Washington, District of Columbia, August 1993, pp 459–465Google Scholar
  32. Mahajan V, Muller E, Bass FM (1990) New product diffusion models in marketing: a review and directions for research. J Marketing 54:1–26Google Scholar
  33. Majchrzak A, Cotton JC (1988) A longitudinal study of adjustment to technological change: the case of job transfers from mass to computer-automated batch production. J Occup Psychol 61:43–66Google Scholar
  34. Martinez E, Polo Y, Elavian C (1998) The acceptance and diffusion of new consumer durables: differences between first and last adopters. J Consumer Marketing 15:323–342CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. McCarthy J (1956) Inversion of functions defined by turing machines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  36. McCarthy J (1958) Programs with common sense. In: Proceedings of the Teddington conference on the mechanization of thought processes, London, England, December 1958, pp 77–84Google Scholar
  37. Mea VD (2001) Agents acting and moving in healthcare scenario—a paradigm for telemedical collaboration. IEEE Transac Eng Manage Inf Technol Biomed 5:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mesak HI, Clark JW (1998) Monopolist optimum pricing and advertising policies for diffusion models of new product innovations. Optimal Control Appl Methods 19:111–136CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  39. Moon J-W, Kim Y-G (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Inf Manage 38:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore GC, Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf Syst Res 2:192–222zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Norman TJ, Jennings NR (2002) Constructing a virtual training laboratory using intelligent agents. Int J Continuous Eng Life-Long Learn 12:201–213Google Scholar
  42. Nwana HS, Ndumu DT (1999) A perspective on software agents research. Knowl Eng Rev 14:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plouffe CR, Hulland JS, Vandenbosch M (2001) Research report: richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions—understanding merchant adoption of a smartcard-based payment system. Inf Syst Res 12:208–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raisinghani MS (2000) Software agents in today’s digital economy: transition to the knowledge society. In: Rahman SM, Bignall RJ (eds) Internet commerce and software agents. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, Pennsylvania, pp 88–100Google Scholar
  45. Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Rogers EM (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Rogers EM, Shoemaker FF (1971) Communication of innovations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Rowley J (2000) Product searching with shopping bots. Internet Res Electronic Netw Appl Policy 10:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Salem DA, Foster-Fishman PG, Goodkind JR (2002) The adoption of innovation in collective action organizations. Am J Community Psychol 30:681–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sartor G, Branting LK (1998) Introduction: judicial applications of artificial intelligence. Artif Intell Law 6:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saygin AP, Cicekli I, Akman V (2000) Turing test: 50 years later. Minds Machines 10:463–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Segal RB, Kephart JO (1999) MailCat: an intelligent assistant for organizing e-mail. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on autonomous agents (Agents’99), Seattle, Washington, May 1999. ACM Press, New York, pp 276–282Google Scholar
  53. Segal RB, Kephart JO (2000) Incremental learning in SwiftFile. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning, Stanford, California, June/July 2000. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 863–870Google Scholar
  54. Sen S, Dutta PS, Mukherjee R (2000) Agents that represent buyer’s interest in e-commerce. In: Working notes of the AAAI-2000 workshop on knowledge-based electronic markets, Austin, Texas, July 2000Google Scholar
  55. Serenko A, Cocosila M (2003) The social impacts of intelligent agents on Internet use. In: Proceedings of the international and interdisciplinary conference of the association of Internet researchers (AoIR 4.0), Toronto, Canada, October 2003Google Scholar
  56. Serenko A, Ruhi U, Cocosila M (2004) Unplanned effects of intelligent agents on Internet use: a social informatics approach. In: Proceedings of the joint meeting of the international conference on politics and information systems, technologies and applications (PISTA 2004) and the international conference on cybernetics and information technologies, systems and applications (CITSA 2004), International Institute of Informatics and Systemics, Orlando, Florida, July 2004Google Scholar
  57. Shoham Y (1997) An overview of agent-oriented programming. In: Bradshaw JM (ed) Software agents. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, California, pp 271–290Google Scholar
  58. Smith AE, Nugent CD, McClean SI (2003) Evaluation of inherent performance of intelligent medical decision support systems: utilising neural networks as an example. Artif Intell Med 27:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Teng JTC, Grover V, Güttler W (2002) Information technology innovations: general diffusion patterns and its relationships to innovation characteristics. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 49:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tornatzky LG, Fleischer M, Chakrabarti AK (1990) The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  61. Turban E, Aronson JE, Bolloju N (eds) (2001) Decision support systems and intelligent systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  62. Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Minds 59:433–460Google Scholar
  63. Utterback JM (1994) Mastering the dynamics of innovation: how companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  64. Venkatesh V, Davis FD (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manage Sci 46:186–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. West LA, Jr., Hess TJ (2002) Metadata as a knowledge management tool: supporting intelligent agent and end user access to spatial data. Decis Support Syst 32:247–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White JE (1997) Mobile agents. In: Bradshaw JM (ed) Software agents. AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, California, pp 437–472Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Michael G. DeGroote School of BusinessMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations