Advertisement

Machine Vision and Applications

, Volume 28, Issue 5–6, pp 569–590 | Cite as

Solving the robot-world hand-eye(s) calibration problem with iterative methods

  • Amy Tabb
  • Khalil M. Ahmad Yousef
Original Paper

Abstract

Robot-world, hand-eye calibration is the problem of determining the transformation between the robot end-effector and a camera, as well as the transformation between the robot base and the world coordinate system. This relationship has been modeled as \({\mathbf {AX}}={\mathbf {ZB}}\), where \({\mathbf {X}}\) and \({\mathbf {Z}}\) are unknown homogeneous transformation matrices. The successful execution of many robot manipulation tasks depends on determining these matrices accurately, and we are particularly interested in the use of calibration for use in vision tasks. In this work, we describe a collection of methods consisting of two cost function classes, three different parameterizations of rotation components, and separable versus simultaneous formulations. We explore the behavior of this collection of methods on real datasets and simulated datasets and compare to seven other state-of-the-art methods. Our collection of methods returns greater accuracy on many metrics as compared to the state-of-the-art. The collection of methods is extended to the problem of robot-world hand-multiple-eye calibration, and results are shown with two and three cameras mounted on the same robot.

Keywords

Robot Hand-eye Calibration Reconstruction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We also would like to thank anonymous reviewers of our previous paper [15] and this paper for their helpful comments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

A. Tabb received a grant from the US National Science Foundation, grant number IOS-1339211.

References

  1. 1.
    Agarwal, S., Mierle, K., et al.: Ceres solver. http://ceres-solver.org
  2. 2.
    Dornaika, F., Horaud, R.: Simultaneous robot-world and hand-eye calibration. IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 14(4), 617–622 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hirsh, R.L., DeSouza, G.N., Kak, A.C.: An iterative approach to the hand-eye and base-world calibration problem. In: Robotics and automation, 2001. Proceedings 2001 ICRA. IEEE international conference on, vol. 3, pp. 2171–2176. IEEE (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Horaud, R., Dornaika, F.: Hand-eye calibration. Int. J. Rob. Res. 14(3), 195–210 (1995)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, A., Lin, W., Defeng, W.: Simultaneous robot-world and hand-eye calibration using dual-quaternions and Kronecker product. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 5(10), 1530–1536 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lourakis, M.: levmar: Levenberg–Marquardt nonlinear least squares algorithms in C/C++. http://www.ics.forth.gr/~lourakis/levmar/ (July 2004). Accessed 18 Nov 2014
  7. 7.
    Malti, A.: Hand-eye calibration with epipolar constraints: application to endoscopy. Rob. Auton. Syst. 61(2), 161–169 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marquardt, D.W.: An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters. J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11(2), 431–441 (1963)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Opencv. http://opencv.org/. Version 2.4.9
  10. 10.
    Shah, M.: Solving the robot-world/hand-eye calibration problem using the Kronecker product. ASME J. Mech. Robot. 5(3), 031,007–031,007-7 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shiu, Y.C., Ahmad, S.: Calibration of wrist-mounted robotic sensors by solving homogeneous transform equations of the form AX = XB. IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 5(1), 16–29 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Strobl, K.H., Hirzinger, G.: Optimal hand-eye calibration. In: 2006 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp. 4647–4653 (2006). doi: 10.1109/IROS.2006.282250
  13. 13.
    Tabb, A.: Shape from silhouette probability maps: reconstruction of thin objects in the presence of silhouette extraction and calibration error. In: 2013 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR) (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tabb, A.: Data from: Solving the robot-world hand-eye(s) calibration problem with iterative methods (2017). doi: 10.15482/USDA.ADC/1340592
  15. 15.
    Tabb, A., Ahmad Yousef, K.: Parameterizations for reducing camera reprojection error for robot-world hand-eye calibration. In: IEEE RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems, pp. 3030–3037 (2015)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Triggs, B., McLauchlan, P.F., Hartley, R.I., Fitzgibbon, A.W.: Bundle adjustment—a modern synthesis. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on vision algorithms: theory and practice, ICCV ’99, pp. 298–372. Springer, London (2000). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=646271.685629
  17. 17.
    Zhang, Z.: A flexible new technique for camera calibration. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 22(11), 1330–1334 (2000). doi: 10.1109/34.888718 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhuang, H., Roth, Z.S., Sudhakar, R.: Simultaneous robot/world and tool/flange calibration by solving homogeneous transformation equations of the form AX = YB. IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom. 10(4), 549–554 (1994). doi: 10.1109/70.313105 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research ServiceAppalachian Fruit Research LaboratoryKearneysvilleUSA
  2. 2.Computer Engineering DepartmentThe Hashemite UniversityZarqaJordan

Personalised recommendations