Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the humidification, heating, and resistance properties of three commercially available heat-moisture exchangers (HMEs). To mimic clinical conditions, a previously validated, new, realistic experimental setup and measurement protocol was used.
Setting: Surgical Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Rotterdam.
Materials: An experimental set-up consisting of a patient model, measurement systems, and ventilator and three different HME types.
Interventions: The air flow, pressure in the ventilation circuit, pressure difference over the HME, and partial water vapour pressure and temperature at each side of the HMEs were measured. Measurements were repeated every 30 min during the first 2 h and every hour up to 24 h for each HME at six different ventilator settings. The mean inspiratory and maximum expiratory resistance, flow-weighted mean absolute humidity and temperature outputs, and humidification and heating efficiencies of HMEs were calculated.
Measurements and results: The Dar Hygroster had the highest humidity output, temperature output, humidification efficiency, and heating efficiency values throughout the study (32.8 ± 21. mg/l, 32.2 ± 0.8 °C, 86.3 ± 2.3 %, and 0.9 ± 0.01 %, respectively) in comparison to the Humid-Vent Filter (25.3 ± 3.2 mg/l, 31.9 ± 0.8 °C, 72.2 ± 5.3%, 0.9 ± 0.02 %, respectively) and the Pall Ultipor BB100 breathing circuit filter (23.4 ± 3 mg/l, 28.3 ± 0.7 °C, 68.8 ± 5.9 %, 0.8 ± 0.02 %, respectively). The inspiratory and expiratory resistance of the HMEs remained below clinically acceptable maximum values (2.60 ± 0.04 and 2.45 ± 0.05 cmH2O/l per s, respectively). Conclusion: The Dar Hygroster filter was found to have the highest humidity and temperature output of all three HMEs, the Humid-Vent filter had a satisfactory humidity output only at low tidal volume flow rate and minute volume settings, whereas the Pall Ultipore BB100 never achieved a sufficient humidity and temperature output.
Humidity Heat and moisture exchangers Mechanical ventilation Temperature Resistance
Chalon J, Markham JP, Ali MM, Ramanathan S, Turndorf H (1984) The Pall Ultipor breathing circuit filter: an efficient heat and moisture exchanger. Anesth Analg 63: 566–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckerbom B, Lindholm CE (1990) Laboratory evaluation of heat and moisture exchangers. Assessment of the draft international standard (ISO/DIS 9360) in practice. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 34: 291–295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckerbom B, Lindholm CE (1990) Performance evaluation of six heat and moisture exchangers according to the draft international standard (ISO/DIN 9360). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 34: 404–409PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heat and Moisture Exchangers (1983–1984) Evaluation. Health Devices Sourcebook 12:155–167Google Scholar
Vickers MD, Mecklenburgh JS, Hampson M (1992) Heat and Moisture exchangers (HME), DAR Hygrobac/Hygroboy. Evaluation 103: 1–12Google Scholar
Vickers MD, Mecklenburgh JS, Hampson M (1992) Heat and moisture exchangers (HME), Gibeck Humid-Vent filter. Evaluation 102:1–10Google Scholar
Vickers MD, Mecklenburgh JS, Hampson M (1992) Heat and moisture exchangers (HME), DAR Hygroster. Evaluation 142:1–16Google Scholar
Mebius C (1992) Heat and moisture exchangers with bacterial filters: a laboratory evaluation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 36:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ünal N, Pompe JC, Holland WPJ, Gültuna I, Huygen PEM, Jabaaij K, Ince C, Saygìn B, Bruining HA (1995) An experimental set-up to test heat-moisture exchangers. Intensive Care Med 21:142–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (1988) Heat and moisture exchangers for use in humidifying respired gases in humans. Draft International Standard (ISO/DIS 9360, 1988) 121:1–13Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (1992) Anaesthetic and respiratory equipment — heat and moisture exchangers for use in humidifying respired gases in humans. International Standard (ISO 9360,1992)Google Scholar
McFadden ER, Pichurko BM, Bowman HF, Ingenito E, Burns S, Dowling N, Solway J (1985) Thermal mapping of the airways in humans. J Appl Physiol 58: 564–579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward JJ, Helmholz HF (1991) Applied humidity and aerosol therapy. In: Burton GG, Hodgkin JE, Ward JJ (eds) Respiratory care. A guide for clinical practice, 3th ed. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp355–396Google Scholar
Cohen IL, Weinberg PF, Fein IA, Rowinski GS (1988) Endotracheal tube occlusion associated with the use of heat and moisture exchangers in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 16: 277–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turtle MJ, Ilsley AH, Rutten AJ, Runciman WB (1987) An evaluation of six disposable heat and moisture exchangers. Anaesth Intensive Care 15: 317–322PubMedGoogle Scholar
Martin C, Papazian L, Perrin G, Bantz P, Gouin F (1992) Performance evaluation of 3 vaporizing humidifiers and 2 heat and moisture exchangers in patients with minute ventilation >101/ min. Chest 102:1347–1350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miyao H, Hirokawa T, Miyasaka K, Kawazoe T (1992) Relative humidity, not absolute humidity, is of great importance when using a humidifier with a heating wire. Crit Care Med 20: 674–679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sottiaux T, Mignolet GRT, Damas P, Lamy M (1993) Comparative evaluation of three heat and moisture exchangers during short-term postoperative mechanical ventilation. Chest 104: 220–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conti G, De Blasi RA, Rocco M, Pelaia P Antonelli M, Bufi M, Mattia C, Gasparetto A (1990) Effects of the heat-moisture exchangers on dynamic hyperinflation of mechanically ventilated COPD patients. Intensive Care Med 16: 441–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar