Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 44, Issue 10, pp 1738–1740 | Cite as

Understanding conflicts of interest

  • Per Olav Vandvik
  • Waleed Alhazzani
  • Morten Hylander Møller
Understanding the Disease

Introduction

In the era of evidence-based medicine, clinical decisions about diagnosis and treatment should be informed by best current evidence integrated with clinical expertise and patient values, preferences and experiences [1]. However, conflicts of interest (COIs) could have a detrimental effect on the synthesis, interpretation and application of evidence in the field of intensive care medicine and in healthcare in general [2, 3]. These effects can be complex and difficult to characterise; therefore, better understanding is crucial. Indeed, evidence is open for interpretation. For example, the design, execution, or interpretation of randomised clinical trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews can be affected by various types of COIs (e.g., financial COIs). Similarly, recommendations in clinical practice guidelines can be highly influenced by unmanaged COIs [4, 5, 6]. Furthermore, COIs may affect decision making in daily clinical practice and in quality improvement initiatives, e.g....

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Djulbegovic B, Guyatt GH (2017) Progress in evidence-based medicine: a quarter century on. Lancet 390:415–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eichacker PQ, Natanson C, Danner RL (2006) Surviving sepsis–practice guidelines, marketing campaigns, and Eli Lilly. N Engl J Med 355:1640–1642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Steinbrook R (2009) Controlling conflict of interest–proposals from the Institute of Medicine. N Engl J Med 360:2160–2163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ioannidis JP (2016) Why most clinical research is not useful. PLoS Med 13:e1002049CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ioannidis JP (2016) The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q 94:485–514CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schunemann HJ, Al-Ansary LA, Forland F, Kersten S, Komulainen J, Kopp IB, Macbeth F, Phillips SM, Robbins C, van der Wees P, Qaseem A, Guidelines International Network: Principles for Disclosure of Interests and Management of Conflicts in Guidelines (2015) Guidelines International Network: principles for disclosure of interests and management of conflicts in guidelines. Ann Intern Med 163:548–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wachter RM, Flanders SA, Fee C, Pronovost PJ (2008) Public reporting of antibiotic timing in patients with pneumonia: lessons from a flawed performance measure. Ann Intern Med 149:29–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schunemann HJ, Osborne M, Moss J, Manthous C, Wagner G, Sicilian L, Ohar J, McDermott S, Lucas L, Jaeschke R, Ethics ATS, Conflict of Interest C, the Documents D, Implementation C (2009) An official American Thoracic Society Policy statement: managing conflict of interest in professional societies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:564–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laine C, Taichman DB, Mulrow C (2011) Trustworthy clinical guidelines. Ann Intern Med 154:774–775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guyatt G, Akl EA, Hirsh J, Kearon C, Crowther M, Gutterman D, Lewis SZ, Nathanson I, Jaeschke R, Schunemann H (2010) The vexing problem of guidelines and conflict of interest: a potential solution. Ann Intern Med 152:738–741CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature and ESICM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MedicineInnlandet Hospital Trust—division GjøvikOsloNorway
  2. 2.Institute of Health and Society, University of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of MedicineMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  4. 4.Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and ImpactMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada
  5. 5.Department of Intensive Care 4131Copenhagen University Hospital RigshospitaletCopenhagenDenmark
  6. 6.Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC)CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations