External validation of a biomarker and clinical prediction model for hospital mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome
- 1.2k Downloads
Mortality prediction in ARDS is important for prognostication and risk stratification. However, no prediction models have been independently validated. A combination of two biomarkers with age and APACHE III was superior in predicting mortality in the NHLBI ARDSNet ALVEOLI trial. We validated this prediction tool in two clinical trials and an observational cohort.
The validation cohorts included 849 patients from the NHLBI ARDSNet Fluid and Catheter Treatment Trial (FACTT), 144 patients from a clinical trial of sivelestat for ARDS (STRIVE), and 545 ARDS patients from the VALID observational cohort study. To evaluate the performance of the prediction model, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), model discrimination, and calibration were assessed, and recalibration methods were applied.
The biomarker/clinical prediction model performed well in all cohorts. Performance was better in the clinical trials with an AUC of 0.74 (95% CI 0.70–0.79) in FACTT, compared to 0.72 (95% CI 0.67–0.77) in VALID, a more heterogeneous observational cohort. The AUC was 0.73 (95% CI 0.70–0.76) when FACTT and VALID were combined.
We validated a mortality prediction model for ARDS that includes age, APACHE III, surfactant protein D, and interleukin-8 in a variety of clinical settings. Although the model performance as measured by AUC was lower than in the original model derivation cohort, the biomarker/clinical model still performed well and may be useful for risk assessment for clinical trial enrollment, an issue of increasing importance as ARDS mortality declines, and better methods are needed for selection of the most severely ill patients for inclusion.
KeywordsValidation Prediction Biomarker Hospital mortality ARDS
American European Consensus Conference
Acute lung injury
Acute physiology and chronic health evaluation
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
Area under receiver operating characteristic curve
Fluid and catheter treatment trial
Intensive care unit
Integrated discrimination improvement
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Net reclassification improvement
Positive end-expiratory pressure
Receiver operating characteristic curve
Sivelestat trial in ALI patients requiring mechanical ventilation
Validating acute lung injury biomarkers for diagnosis
This manuscript was prepared using FACTT Research Materials obtained from the NHLBI Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the FACTT investigators or the NHLBI. We would like to thank the NHLBI BioLINCC/Biorepository for providing clinical samples and clinical data from the FACTT clinical trial. We also thank Eli Lilly and Company for providing clinical data and plasma samples from the STRIVE study.
Compliance with ethical standards
This study was supported by NIH HL112656 (LBW), 1K23HL116800-01 (KK), HL51856 (MAM), HL110969 and HL131621 (CSC), and the NHLBI BioLINCC/Biorepository.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study with the exception of some patients in the VALID study who were enrolled under an IRB-approved waiver of informed consent.
- 3.Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Takeda S, Ishizaka A, Fujino Y, Fukuoka T, Nagano O, Yamada Y, Takezawa J, Multicenter Clinical Trail Committee, Japan Society of Respiratory Care Medicine (2005) Time to change diagnostic criteria of ARDS: towards the disease entity-based subgrouping. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 18:115–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Brun-Buisson C, Minelli C, Bertolini G, Brazzi L, Pimentel J, Lewandowski K, Bion J, Romand JA, Villar J, Thorsteinsson A, Damas P, Armaganidis A, Lemaire F, Alive Study Group (2004) Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care units. Results from the ALIVE study. Intensive Care Med 30:51–61CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Venet C, Guyomarc’h S, Pingat J, Michard C, Laporte S, Bertrand M, Gery P, Page D, Vermesch R, Bertrand JC, Zeni F (2003) Prognostic factors in acute respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective multivariate analysis including prone positioning in management strategy. Intensive Care Med 29:1435–1441CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Sapru A, Calfee CS, Liu KD, Kangelaris K, Hansen H, Pawlikowska L, Ware LB, Alkhouli MF, Abbott J, Matthay MA, NHLBI ARDS Network (2015) Plasma soluble thrombomodulin levels are associated with mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 41:470–478CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Laffey JG, Bellani G, Pham T, Fan E, Madotto F, Bajwa EK, Brochard L, Clarkson K, Esteban A, Gattinoni L, van Haren F, Heunks LM, Kurahashi K, Laake JH, Larsson A, McAuley DF, McNamee L, Nin N, Qiu H, Ranieri M, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Wrigge H, Slutsky AS, Pesenti A, LUNG SAFE Investigators and the ESICM Trials Group (2016) Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study. Intensive Care Med 42:1865–1876CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Brown LM, Calfee CS, Matthay MA, Brower RG, Thompson BT, Checkley W, The National Institutes of Health Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2011) A simple classification model for hospital mortality in patients with acute lung injury managed with lung protective ventilation. Crit Care Med 39:2645–2651CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Cooke CR, Shah CV, Gallop R, Bellamy S, Ancukiewicz M, Eisner MD, Lanken PN, Localio AR, Christie JD, National Heart Lung Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2009) A simple clinical predictive index for objective estimates of mortality in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 37:1913–1920CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Moreno RP, Metnitz PG, Metnitz B, Bauer P, Afonso de Carvalho S, Hoechtl A, SAPS 3 Investigators (2008) Modeling in-hospital patient survival during the first 28 days after intensive care unit admission: a prognostic model for clinical trials in general critically ill patients. J Crit Care 23:339–348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Villar J, Ambros A, Soler JA, Martinez D, Ferrando C, Solano R, Mosteiro F, Blanco J, Martin-Rodriguez C, Fernandez MM, Lopez J, Diaz-Dominguez FJ, Andaluz-Ojeda D, Merayo E, Perez-Mendez L, Fernandez RL, Kacmarek RM, Stratification Outcome of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2016) Age, PaO2/FIO2, and plateau pressure score: a proposal for a simple outcome score in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 44:1361–1369CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Ware LB, Koyama T, Billheimer DD, Wu W, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Brower RG, Standiford TJ, Martin TR, Matthay MA, NHLBI ARDS Clinical Trials Network (2010) Prognostic and pathogenetic value of combining clinical and biochemical indices in patients with acute lung injury. Chest 137:288–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Ware LB, Zhao Z, Koyama T, Wickersham N, Kangelaris KN, Bernard GR, Matthay MA, Calfee CS (2015) Validation of a biomarker and clinical prediction model for mortality in ARDS in three patient cohorts. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:A6249Google Scholar
- 27.Brower RG, Lanken PN, MacIntyre N, Matthay MA, Morris A, Ancukiewicz M, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, The National Heart Lung Blood Institute Ards Clinical Trials Network (2004) Higher versus lower positive end-expiratory pressures in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 351:327–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL, The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Clinical Trials Network (2006) Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 354:2564–2575CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.ARDS Definition Task Force, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, Fan E, Camporota L, Slutsky AS (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA 307:2526–2533Google Scholar
- 33.Schneider AG, Lipcsey M, Bailey M, Pilcher DV, Bellomo R (2013) Simple translational equations to compare illness severity scores in intensive care trials. J Crit Care 28(885):e881–888Google Scholar
- 38.Duggal A, Ganapathy A, Ratnapalan M, Adhikari NK (2015) Pharmacological treatments for acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review. Miner Anestesiol 81:567–588Google Scholar