Renal recovery after acute kidney injury
- 5.9k Downloads
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent complication of critical illness and carries a significant risk of short- and long-term mortality, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and cardiovascular events. The degree of renal recovery from AKI may substantially affect these long-term endpoints. Therefore maximising recovery of renal function should be the goal of any AKI prevention and treatment strategy. Defining renal recovery is far from straightforward due in part to the limitations of the tests available to assess renal function. Here, we discuss common pitfalls in the evaluation of renal recovery and provide suggestions for improved assessment in the future. We review the epidemiology of renal recovery and of the association between AKI and the development of CKD. Finally, we stress the importance of post-discharge follow-up of AKI patients and make suggestions for its incorporation into clinical practice. Summary key points are that risk factors for non-recovery of AKI are age, CKD, comorbidity, higher severity of AKI and acute disease scores. Second, AKI and CKD are mutually related and seem to have a common denominator. Third, despite its limitations full recovery of AKI may best be defined as the absence of AKI criteria, and partial recovery as a fall in AKI stage. Fourth, after an episode of AKI, serial follow-up measurements of serum creatinine and proteinuria are warranted to diagnose renal impairment and prevent further progression. Measures to promote recovery are similar to those preventing renal harm. Specific interventions promoting repair are still experimental.
KeywordsAcute kidney injury Acute kidney disease Chronic kidney disease Renal replacement therapy Follow-up Biomarkers
Introduction: why focus on recovery?
Pathophysiology of recovery
The mechanisms underlying the renal repair process after AKI have predominantly been studied in animal models of ischaemic AKI, characterized by loss of the brush border, principally in the proximal tubular epithelium, with inflammatory cell infiltration and epithelial cell sloughing, followed by repopulation of the damaged tubules by regenerating cells. After much debate as to whether the cells involved in this regenerative process are endogenous tubular epithelial cells, adult renal stem cells or bone marrow-derived stem cells, there is now increasing evidence that the repopulation mainly relies on surviving endogenous tubular cells with bone marrow-derived stem cells having at most a paracrine role through growth factor secretion .
Clinical definition of renal recovery
Pitfalls in evaluation of recovery
Assessment of baseline function
An adequate definition of renal recovery requires a reliable assessment of baseline kidney function to distinguish non-recovery from pre-existing CKD. Efforts to obtain baseline kidney function, e.g. from the primary care or referring specialists, are therefore of utmost importance. The mean outpatient serum creatinine (SCr) (and the derived estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) or, failing this, the most recent SCr measured between 7 and 365 days prior to the start of the acute illness is generally considered the best reflection of baseline kidney function . Extremes in muscle mass or dietary protein intake may affect SCr independent of kidney function. Although use of cystatin C and cystatin-based eGFR equations may reduce this problem , a baseline cystatin C level is rarely available. Another potential shortcoming of SCr, and the derived eGFR, is insensitivity to detect mild underlying CKD and the inability to detect the pre-existing presence or absence of renal functional reserve .
In the absence of a known baseline SCr the Kidney Diseases Improving Global outcomes (KDIGO) AKI workgroup suggests estimation of baseline through use of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation . This estimation assumes that patients have a baseline eGFR of 75 mL/min/1.73 m2, does not allow one to detect the presence of pre-existing CKD or well-preserved renal function and will undoubtedly confound the evaluation of recovery . In addition, the absence of a baseline SCr is usually non-random as demonstrated in a recent analysis which found less complete recovery in patients with unknown or missing baseline SCr compared with those with a known baseline . An alternative is to use admission creatinine as a baseline. However, this ignores pre-admission AKI and has many other potential confounders including the absence of steady state, the effect of dilution after fluid resuscitation and reduced creatinine production in critical illness .
Defining the population
While most studies on renal recovery exclude prior ESKD (as defined by need for chronic dialysis), the handling of pre-existing CKD is variable. Furthermore, recovery has been reported in different populations (hospitalized versus ICU patients, general ICU versus specific surgical or medical populations, inclusion or exclusion of less severe forms of AKI). Whether recovery should be evaluated in all AKI patients or in survivors only depends on the setting. In a clinical trial evaluating an intervention to improve recovery, mortality should be treated as a competing endpoint. However, recovery in survivors may also be relevant to assess at the bedside .
Timing of recovery assessment
In the past, renal recovery was often defined as independence from RRT following dialysis-requiring AKI. More recently, non-recovery from less severe AKI has received more attention due to its association with adverse long-term outcomes [1, 21]. Despite many limitations the most obvious definition of full recovery from AKI is the absence of AKI criteria. Partial recovery can then be defined as a fall in AKI stage. Recovery may occur early after the insult leading to AKI or later during the phase of AKD (Fig. 3). However, it is important to appreciate that the use of the creatinine criteria may result in important underestimation of recovery in patients with unknown premorbid creatinine  or overestimation of recovery by ignoring the loss of muscle mass that occurs during critical illness [19, 24]. Tubular secretion of creatinine, the contribution of which increases with decreasing GFR, also results in overestimation of GFR by creatinine clearance. An alternative definition of non-recovery might be the presence of eGFR criteria for new or worsening CKD , which, however, still relies on SCr with its associated shortcomings.
An ideal definition of recovery would compare the gold standard of GFR measurement before and after the episode of AKI. Even better would be the inclusion of an assessment of renal functional reserve before and after the episode of AKI. However, outside predictable events such as elective major surgery, accrual of such data is highly unlikely. Despite this, there are potential avenues for improved assessment of renal recovery which are discussed below.
Measurement of creatinine clearance
A potential avenue for exploration is the determination of the measured creatinine clearance at ICU discharge from a timed urinary collection coupled with a serum creatinine determination. Such an estimate of GFR is not without its detractors but is readily available and economical. Since premorbid creatinine clearance will usually not be available, defining recovery by this parameter assumes that the estimation of premorbid GFR with predictive equations is reliable and does not account for overestimation of glomerular filtration by creatinine clearance due to tubular creatinine excretion . However, measuring creatinine clearance at ICU or hospital discharge may serve as a baseline for the follow-up.
Measurement of renal functional reserve
Risk factors for short-term non-recovery of renal function
Patient-related risk factors
Chronic kidney disease
Severity of acute disease
High illness severity
Severity of AKI
Higher KDIGO stage
Kinetic eGFR is a mathematical method to estimate underlying renal function from the rate of change of creatinine during non-steady state conditions and has been proposed for the earlier detection of changes in GFR, both during development and recovery of AKI [27, 28]. However, in the critically ill there are several potential confounders that affect measured SCr concentrations and the eGFR, including assumptions regarding maximal rise in creatinine, reductions in creatinine production and changes in the volume of distribution. Although in comparison with novel AKI biomarkers, this technique has been shown to perform as well or better in predicting short-term recovery of kidney function (within 48 h) , the assumption that muscle mass is constant makes it less useful in assessing kidney function including recovery over a longer time-period in ICU patients. Measurement and correction of kinetic eGFR for muscle mass loss may be a way of improving this method.
Real-time GFR monitoring
Real-time GFR monitoring techniques are still experimental [29, 30], but nearing clinical implementation. The development of such systems will clearly aid in identifying individuals who have not recovered full function .
Biomarkers for (non)recovery
Biomarkers of short-term acute kidney injury (AKI) recovery versus persistence to acute kidney disease (AKD)
453 amino acid protein; precursor of angiotensin I
13 kDa cysteine protease inhibitor produced by all nucleated human cells; undergoes glomerular filtration
Hepatocyte growth factor
Antifibrotic cytokine produced by mesenchymal cells and involved in tubular cell regeneration after AKI
29 kDa and 21 kDa proteins involved in cell cycle arrest; released into urine after tubular cell stress
18 kDa pro-inflammatory cytokine; regulates innate and adaptive immunity; released into urine after proximal tubular cell injury
39 kDa transmembrane glycoprotein involved in tubular regeneration; released into urine following ischaemic or nephrotoxic tubular cell damage
Need for RRT
14 kDa intracellular lipid chaperone produced in proximal tubular cells; aids in regulation of fatty acid uptake and intracellular transport; excretion into urine after tubular injury
Endogenous single-stranded molecules of non-coding nucleotides; upregulated following tubular cell injury and cell proliferation; detectable in plasma and urine
>130 kDa lysosomal enzyme; produced in proximal and distal tubular cells; released into urine after tubular cell injury
At least three different types:
Monomeric 25 kDa glycoprotein produced by neutrophils and epithelial cells, including renal tubules
Homodimeric 45 kDa protein produced by neutrophils
Heterodimeric 135 kDa protein produced by renal tubular cells released into urine following systemic production or tubular injury
Few studies have evaluated these classical injury markers for their ability to predict recovery. Currently, NGAL has received most attention in this context. Plasma NGAL, measured on the first day of AKI stage 3, has been shown to be a reasonable predictor of failure to recover in a cohort of patients with community-acquired pneumonia, many of whom were not in the ICU . A small substudy of the VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network Study found that, in addition to age and a high Charlson comorbidity index, higher concentrations of a panel of urinary biomarkers at day 14 after commencement of RRT may improve the prediction of non-recovery/dialysis dependence at 60 days . However, the investigators used a combined endpoint of death or renal non-recovery and only had 25 deaths and 13 non-recovery patients. Similarly, a panel of biomarkers applied to patients with AKI requiring RRT demonstrated that decreasing urinary NGAL during the first 14 days following AKI was associated with a reduced need for renal support at 60 days . This study clearly highlights the value of repeated measures over single values. KIM-1 and L-FABP have also been proposed as a marker of renal recovery after AKI [35, 36]. Similarly the product of the more recently described G1 cell cycle arrest markers of renal stress TIMP-2 and IGFBP7 ([TIMP-2] × [IGFBP7]) predicted short-term renal recovery/non-recovery within 48 h in 57 patients with early AKI .
Even less data is available on biomarkers that are specific for the repair process. In the setting of CKD, transforming growth factor beta (TGFβ), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and matrix metalloproteinase protein-2 (MMP-2) have been shown to correlate with fibrosis and CKD progression . After renal transplantation, urinary YKL-40, a repair phase protein, in the donor is independently associated with recovery from AKI and delayed graft function . Dipstick albuminuria greater than 30 mg/dL is independently associated with lower rates of AKI recovery at 30 days in patients with sepsis . Another promising biomarker for recovery is osteopontin [41, 42].
In general, trials evaluating biomarkers for prediction of recovery after AKI have been small and focussed predominantly on the differentiation between transient AKI and AKD.
Identification and Validation of Biomarkers of Acute Kidney Injury Recovery (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01868724) was a multicentre study to validate biomarkers specifically for major adverse kidney event (MAKE) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) following an episode of AKI in ICU. The results are still awaited. Hopefully, the increasing insights into the molecular mechanisms of renal recovery will lead to new biomarkers specific to the repair process.
Potential markers of tubular function
One area that has received little attention in the post AKI period is that of tubular function. In CKD, proteinuria is the best predictor of both disease progression and ESKD over and above hypertension  which may arise because of both increased glomerular permeability and reduced tubular uptake of filtered protein. A few studies have highlighted that patients with preoperative proteinuria are at increased risk of AKI particularly after cardiac surgery [44, 45] and after severe burns . Moreover, (tubular) proteinuria has been found to be associated with worse outcomes in the critically ill including the rate of AKI and long-term kidney function [47, 48, 49]. Other markers of tubular function have not been studied in any detail. Since proteinuria is known to be a modifiable risk factor in CKD, such assessment should be mandated in the follow-up of patients with AKI.
Epidemiology of renal outcome after AKI
Short-term renal outcome
Rates of non-recovery from dialysis-requiring AKI differ dramatically among populations and can vary between 0% and 40% [12, 50]. Differences in the indications and thresholds for starting RRT may account for some variability. Other studies have evaluated recovery from all AKI (including less severe forms) and reported complete recovery rates between 33% and 90% [12, 19, 32, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57]. However, the use of different definitions of AKI (with or without inclusion of the urine output criteria, with inclusion or exclusion of less severe forms), different definitions of recovery, the variable case-mix (surgical, medical or mixed population, inclusion or exclusion of patients with CKD, evaluation in survivors only) and differences in timing of assessment of recovery prevent a direct comparison of the results. Last, inclusion of patients dying during ICU stay strongly affects recovery rate, recovery being a time-dependent process and death during ICU stay acting as a potent confounder .
Long-term renal outcome
The association between AKI and subsequent progression to CKD has been highlighted by recent epidemiological studies [1, 3, 5, 6, 10, 21, 34, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62], although a causal relation cannot be proven. The association between AKI and CKD is complex and multidirectional so that CKD evolution may be either through non-recovery from AKI, de-novo development of CKD after recovery from AKI or progression of pre-existing CKD. In patients without prior CKD who have complete recovery of renal function, the risk of progressive CKD may be low . However other authors have demonstrated a substantial incidence of de novo CKD and death in survivors of AKI, including those who do not require RRT .
Long-term risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) after acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal replacement therapy (RRT) treated AKI
Absolute risk (%)/at time
Hazard ratio, HR (95% CI) over time
AKI (all stages) vs. non-AKI
2% vs. 0.08%/1 year 
3.9% vs. 0.3%/5 year
HR 3.1 (1.9–5.0) per 100 patient-years 
180 days: 8.5% 
1 year: 20% 
5 years: 11.7% (cumulative risk) 
7 years: 3.4% (new ESKD) 
Up to 180 days: HR 105 (78–148) vs. critically ill 
From 80 days to 5 years: HR 6.2(4.7–8.1) vs. critically ill 
Risk factors/predictors for non-recovery
Risk factors for non-recovery after AKI include age, comorbidity, severity of acute disease and potentially the modality of RRT [64, 68]. Among patient-related risk factors for non-recovery, high age [4, 12, 33, 61], the presence of CKD [8, 12, 34, 61, 69] and comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus and cardiac disease [12, 33, 50] are the most frequently reported hazards. The common denominator is diminished glomerular reserve associated with age or chronic disease, suggesting a common underlying disease causing AKI and CKD. Type and severity of the acute disease process may also determine non-recovery. A high acuity of illness as reflected by higher APACHE or SAPS scores [12, 70, 71], a higher degree of haemodynamic instability [12, 34, 72], medical admission  or more severe AKI [12, 59, 73, 74] are additional risk factors for non-recovery. Interestingly, the evidence associating sepsis diagnosis with renal recovery after AKI is conflicting [12, 58]. In summary, putative mechanisms predisposing to renal non-recovery are exposure of a relatively decreased nephron mass to greater injury coupled with impaired or maladaptive repair mechanisms associated with age or chronic disease.
In general, patients needing RRT have a higher mortality and risk of non-recovery [64, 71, 75, 76]. Whereas some data suggest that RRT may be independently associated with impaired recovery following AKI , this issue remains controversial because of numerous unmeasured confounding variables. The impact of RRT modality on recovery remains controversial, too. While retrospective cohort studies suggest that initial use of CRRT is associated with less CKD than intermittent haemodialysis [64, 66], not all studies support this notion . A meta-analysis showed that the benefit of CRRT was based on results in observational studies but not randomised controlled trials (RCTs) . Interestingly, a recent retrospective observational French study used marginal structural modelling and found no differences in 30-day mortality and dialysis dependence (combined primary outcome) between continuous and intermittent RRT in the overall population. However, continuous treatment was associated with better 30-day survival without dialysis in patients with fluid overload, while it was associated with worse outcome in patients without haemodynamic instability at commencement of RRT . Another recent multicentre retrospective cohort evaluating 638 patients alive at hospital discharge could not demonstrate any difference in renal recovery after adjustment for covariates between patients treated with intermittent haemodialysis or continuous RRT . The authors suggest that when initial RRT modality is chosen primarily on haemodynamics, renal recovery in survivors is comparable between both modalities. Altogether, risk factors for non-recovery of AKI are higher age, CKD, comorbidity, higher severity of AKI and acute disease scores, while intermittent haemodialysis seems to be associated with non-recovery in patients with fluid overload at commencement of RRT.
Potential measures to promote renal recovery
General measures aimed at preventing AKI and protecting the kidney function should increase the chances for recovery [22, 23, 79]. This includes avoiding hyperglycaemia and nephrotoxins as well as using strict therapeutic drug monitoring if applicable. Episodes of renal hypoperfusion should be avoided by ensuring haemodynamic stability and adapting RRT modality to the haemodynamic situation and the presence of fluid overload [77, 78]. Specific interventions to promote recovery are still experimental. Promotion of cell proliferation and renal repair by clusterin [80, 81] and/or reducing post-injury fibrosis by AT1 receptor antagonism , pyridoxamine , alpha klotho , endothelial sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1  or PTBA analogues  are some approaches that have shown promising results in animal studies.
Follow-up of AKI patients
Which patients require follow-up?
Follow-up for development of CKD should be considered in all patients who developed AKI, irrespective of the apparent degree of renal recovery. Importantly, while only a small proportion of AKI survivors may develop ESKD over time, many instead die, especially from cardiovascular causes . CKD is indeed strongly associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality [87, 88]. In younger survivors, development of hypertension and cardiovascular disease may accelerate CKD progression, so that ESKD may develop after many years even if there is an apparently good initial recovery. Thus, in all groups of AKI survivors there is great potential for interventions to improve longer-term outcomes.
How to organize follow-up?
Survivors of severe AKI requiring RRT and those with more advanced CKD may specifically benefit from specialist nephrology review . Even at 3 months, creatinine may not accurately reflect GFR in many survivors of critical illness. Measurement of serum cystatin C, urinary creatinine clearance or even, theoretically, formal measurement of GFR may be required in patients with significant loss of muscle mass. Besides measurement of GFR, CKD assessment requires an assessment of proteinuria (urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio). Proteinuria, a common outcome after AKI even in the absence of overt renal dysfunction , potentially indicates underlying hyperfiltration and loss of renal reserve; however, irrespective of the underlying mechanism, its clinical importance is clear as proteinuria is very strongly associated with cardiovascular risk and progression of CKD at all levels of GFR [87, 88].
Even in the absence of evidence of CKD at 90 days, survivors of significant AKI should have at least one further check for CKD criteria at 1 year to check for late progression. A recent single-centre study examined patients who had eGFR greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 12 months or later after an episode of dialysis-treated AKI with a primary outcome of time to CKD as defined by eGFR persistently less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Interestingly, in this cohort few patients with no CKD criteria function at 1 year developed CKD over a median 9 years of follow-up. In those who did risk factors for the development of long-term renal impairment consisted of older age, diabetes and known vascular disease. Thus, it may be reasonable to assume that AKI survivors without CKD at 1 year after illness are at low risk in the absence of other risk factors.
As the long-term ill effects of AKI are partially mediated through the development of CKD the management of these patients should follow general current well-developed clinical CKD guidelines . Treatment of hypertension and modification of cardiovascular risk factors are central to management of patients with or at risk of CKD. In patients with diabetes or proteinuria, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin-2 receptor blocking agents should be first-line drugs for hypertension, as these may reduce proteinuria and the rate of progression of CKD . However, recurrent episodes of AKI are a concern, and any follow-up programme should address the prevention and early detection of new episodes of AKI, including the need for early assessment with new acute illness and advice regarding the avoidance of nephrotoxin exposure and adjustment of regular medication in the setting of illness .
The acceptance of a unifying definition of AKI has increased awareness of the syndrome and generated much knowledge on morbidity and outcome. Less attention has been given to recovery from AKI. Despite many limitations, non-recovery of AKI is best defined as the presence of AKI criteria, and partial recovery as a fall in AKI stage. Both are associated with the development of CKD and cardiovascular diseases, need of chronic dialysis and mortality. The incidence of non-recovery differs between studies and populations. Risk factors include high age, CKD, comorbidity, higher severity of AKI and acute disease. After an episode of AKI serial follow-up measurements of serum creatinine and proteinuria are warranted to diagnose progressive renal impairment and implement measures to manage CKD if necessary.
Open access funding provided by University of Innsbruck and Medical University of Innsbruck.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 1.Xu JR, Zhu JM, Jiang J, Ding XQ, Fang Y, Shen B, Liu ZH, Zou JZ, Liu L, Wang CS, Ronco C, Liu H, Teng J (2015) Risk factors for long-term mortality and progressive chronic kidney disease associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Medicine 94:e2025CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Bernardi MH, Schmidlin D, Ristl R, Heitzinger C, Schiferer A, Neugebauer T, Wrba T, Hiesmayr M, Druml W, Lassnigg A (2016) Serum creatinine back-estimation in cardiac surgery patients: misclassification of AKI using existing formulae and a data-driven model. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 11:395–404CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 21.Heung M, Steffick DE, Zivin K, Gillespie BW, Banerjee T, Hsu CY, Powe NR, Pavkov ME, Williams DE, Saran R, Shahinian VB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CKD Surveillance Team (2016) Acute kidney injury recovery pattern and subsequent risk of CKD: an analysis of veterans health administration data. Am J Kidney Dis 67:742–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Chawla LS, Bellomo R, Bihorac A, Goldstein SL, Siew ED, Bagshaw SM, Bittleman D, Cruz D, Endre Z, Fitzgerald RL, Forni L, Kane-Gill SL, Hoste E, Koyner J, Liu KD, Macedo E, Mehta R, Murray P, Nadim M, Ostermann M, Palevsky PM, Pannu N, Rosner M, Wald R, Zarbock A, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Acute Disease Quality Initiative Workgroup 16 (2017) Acute kidney disease and renal recovery: consensus report of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) 16 Workgroup. Nat Revi Nephrol 13:241–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wang E, Meier DJ, Sandoval RM, Von Hendy-Willson VE, Pressler BM, Bunch RM, Alloosh M, Sturek MS, Schwartz GJ, Molitoris BA (2012) A portable fiberoptic ratiometric fluorescence analyzer provides rapid point-of-care determination of glomerular filtration rate in large animals. Kidney Int 81:112–117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Rajagopalan R, Neumann WL, Poreddy AR, Fitch RM, Freskos JN, Asmelash B, Gaston KR, Galen KP, Shieh JJ, Dorshow RB (2011) Hydrophilic pyrazine dyes as exogenous fluorescent tracer agents for real-time point-of-care measurement of glomerular filtration rate. J Med Chem 54:5048–5058CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Srisawat N, Murugan R, Lee M, Kong L, Carter M, Angus DC, Kellum JA, Genetic, Inflammatory Markers of Sepsis Study I (2011) Plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin predicts recovery from acute kidney injury following community-acquired pneumonia. Kidney Int 80:545–552CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 33.Srisawat N, Wen X, Lee M, Kong L, Elder M, Carter M, Unruh M, Finkel K, Vijayan A, Ramkumar M, Paganini E, Singbartl K, Palevsky PM, Kellum JA (2011) Urinary biomarkers and renal recovery in critically ill patients with renal support. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 6:1815–1823CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 34.Lin YF, Ko WJ, Chu TS, Chen YS, Wu VC, Chen YM, Wu MS, Chen YW, Tsai CW, Shiao CC, Li WY, Hu FC, Tsai PR, Tsai TJ, Wu KD, NSARF Study Group (2009) The 90-day mortality and the subsequent renal recovery in critically ill surgical patients requiring acute renal replacement therapy. Am J Surg 198:325–332CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Levitsky J, Baker TB, Jie C, Ahya S, Levin M, Friedewald J, Al-Saden P, Salomon DR, Abecassis MM (2014) Plasma protein biomarkers enhance the clinical prediction of kidney injury recovery in patients undergoing liver transplantation. Hepatology 60:2017–2026Google Scholar
- 42.Yang T, Sun S, Zhao Y, Liu Q, Han M, Lin L, Su B, Huang S, Yang L (2017) Biomarkers upon discontinuation of renal replacement therapy predict 60-day survival and renal recovery in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Hemodial Int. doi:10.1111/hdi.12532
- 44.Huang TM, Wu VC, Young GH, Lin YF, Shiao CC, Wu PC, Li WY, Yu HY, Hu FC, Lin JW, Chen YS, Lin YH, Wang SS, Hsu RB, Chang FC, Chou NK, Chu TS, Yeh YC, Tsai PR, Huang JW, Lin SL, Chen YM, Ko WJ, Wu KD, National Taiwan University Hospital Study Group of Acute Renal Failure (2011) Preoperative proteinuria predicts adverse renal outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Soc Nephrol 22:156–163Google Scholar
- 46.Hu JY, Meng XC, Han J, Xiang F, Fang YD, Wu J, Peng YZ, Wu YZ, Huang YS, Luo QZ (2012) Relation between proteinuria and acute kidney injury in patients with severe burns. Crit Care 16:R172Google Scholar
- 51.Alves SC, Tomasi CD, Constantino L, Giombelli V, Candal R, Bristot Mde L, Topanotti MF, Burdmann EA, Dal-Pizzol F, Fraga CM, Ritter C (2013) Hypomagnesemia as a risk factor for the non-recovery of the renal function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transpl 28:910–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 53.Gammelager H, Christiansen CF, Johansen MB, Tonnesen E, Jespersen B, Sorensen HT (2014) Three-year risk of cardiovascular disease among intensive care patients with acute kidney injury: a population-based cohort study. Crit Care 18:492Google Scholar
- 54.Garzotto F, Piccinni P, Cruz D, Gramaticopolo S, Dal Santo M, Aneloni G, Kim JC, Rocco M, Alessandri E, Giunta F, Michetti V, Iannuzzi M, Belluomo Anello C, Brienza N, Carlini M, Pelaia P, Gabbanelli V, Ronco C (2011) RIFLE-based data collection/management system applied to a prospective cohort multicenter Italian study on the epidemiology of acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. Blood Purif 31:159–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, Tan I, Bouman C, Macedo E, Gibney N, Tolwani A, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Ronco C, Kellum JA, Beginning and Ending Supportive Therapy for the Kidney (BEST Kidney) Investigators (2007) Septic acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: clinical characteristics and outcomes. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2:431–439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 60.Lai CF, Wu VC, Huang TM, Yeh YC, Wang KC, Han YY, Lin YF, Jhuang YJ, Chao CT, Shiao CC, Tsai PR, Hu FC, Chou NK, Ko WJ, Wu KD, National Taiwan University Hospital Study Group on Acute Renal Failure (2012) Kidney function decline after a non-dialysis-requiring acute kidney injury is associated with higher long-term mortality in critically ill survivors. Crit Care 16:R123Google Scholar
- 62.Rimes-Stigare C, Frumento P, Bottai M, Martensson J, Martling CR, Walther SM, Karlstrom G, Bell M (2015) Evolution of chronic renal impairment and long-term mortality after de novo acute kidney injury in the critically ill; a Swedish multi-centre cohort study. Crit Care 19:221Google Scholar
- 64.Wald R, Shariff SZ, Adhikari NK, Bagshaw SM, Burns KE, Friedrich JO, Garg AX, Harel Z, Kitchlu A, Ray JG (2014) The association between renal replacement therapy modality and long-term outcomes among critically ill adults with acute kidney injury: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 42:868–877CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 65.Gallagher M, Cass A, Bellomo R, Finfer S, Gattas D, Lee J, Lo S, McGuinness S, Myburgh J, Parke R, Rajbhandari D, POST-RENAL Study Investigators and the ANZICS Clinical Trials Group (2014) Long-term survival and dialysis dependency following acute kidney injury in intensive care: extended follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med 11:e1001601CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 70.Mehta RL, McDonald B, Gabbai FB, Pahl M, Pascual MT, Farkas A, Kaplan RM, Collaborative Group for Treatment of ARFitICU (2001) A randomized clinical trial of continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute renal failure. Kidney Int 60:1154–1163Google Scholar
- 73.Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, Schetz M, Tan I, Bouman C, Macedo E, Gibney N, Tolwani A, Straaten HO, Ronco C, Kellum JA (2009) Discontinuation of continuous renal replacement therapy: a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study. Crit Care Med 37:2576–2582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 76.Elseviers MM, Lins RL, Van der Niepen P, Hoste E, Malbrain ML, Damas P, Devriendt J, SHARF investigators (2010) Renal replacement therapy is an independent risk factor for mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care 14:R221Google Scholar
- 78.Truche AS, Darmon M, Bailly S, Clec’h C, Dupuis C, Misset B, Azoulay E, Schwebel C, Bouadma L, Kallel H, Adrie C, Dumenil AS, Argaud L, Marcotte G, Jamali S, Zaoui P, Laurent V, Goldgran-Toledano D, Sonneville R, Souweine B, Timsit JF, OUTCOMEREA Study Group (2016) Continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis in intensive care patients: impact on mortality and renal recovery. Intensive Care Med 42:1408–1417Google Scholar
- 79.Joannidis M, Druml W, Forni LG, Groeneveld AB, Honore P, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Ronco C, Schetz MR, Woittiez AJ (2010) Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit. Expert opinion of the Working Group for Nephrology, ESICM. Intensive Care Med 36:392–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 82.Rodriguez-Romo R, Benitez K, Barrera-Chimal J, Perez-Villalva R, Gomez A, Aguilar-Leon D, Rangel-Santiago JF, Huerta S, Gamba G, Uribe N, Bobadilla NA (2016) AT1 receptor antagonism before ischemia prevents the transition of acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 89:363–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 86.Wu VC, Wu CH, Huang TM, Wang CY, Lai CF, Shiao CC, Chang CH, Lin SL, Chen YY, Chen YM, Chu TS, Chiang WC, Wu KD, Tsai PR, Chen L, Ko WJ, NSARF Group (2014) Long-term risk of coronary events after AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol 25:595–605Google Scholar
- 87.Matsushita K, Coresh J, Sang Y, Chalmers J, Fox C, Guallar E, Jafar T, Jassal SK, Landman GW, Muntner P, Roderick P, Sairenchi T, Schottker B, Shankar A, Shlipak M, Tonelli M, Townend J, van Zuilen A, Yamagishi K, Yamashita K, Gansevoort R, Sarnak M, Warnock DG, Woodward M, Arnlov J, CKD Prognosis Consortium (2015) Estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria for prediction of cardiovascular outcomes: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 3:514–525Google Scholar
- 91.Silver SA, Goldstein SL, Harel Z, Harvey A, Rompies EJ, Adhikari NK, Acedillo R, Jain AK, Richardson R, Chan CT, Chertow GM, Bell CM, Wald R (2015) Ambulatory care after acute kidney injury: an opportunity to improve patient outcomes. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2:36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 95.Stoumpos S, Mark PB, McQuarrie EP, Traynor JP, Geddes CC (2017) Continued monitoring of acute kidney injury survivors might not be necessary in those regaining an estimated glomerular filtration rate >60 mL/min at 1 year. Nephrol Dial Transpl 32:81–88Google Scholar
- 96.The National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions (UK) (2008) Chronic kidney disease: national clinical guideline for early identification and management in adults in primary and secondary care. Royal College of Physicians, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 97.Jafar TH, Stark PC, Schmid CH, Landa M, Maschio G, Marcantoni C, de Jong PE, de Zeeuw D, Shahinfar S, Ruggenenti P, Remuzzi G, Levey AS, AIPRD Study Group (2001) Proteinuria as a modifiable risk factor for the progression of non-diabetic renal disease. Kidney Int 60:1131–1140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.