Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 43, Issue 7, pp 1067–1068 | Cite as

Implementation of continuous qEEG in two neurointensive care units by intensivists: a feasibility study

  • Giuseppe Citerio
  • Adriana Patruno
  • Simone Beretta
  • Luca Longhi
  • Barbara Frigeni
  • Luca Lorini
  • On behalf of Continuous Quantified EEG in NeuroIntensive Care (CrazyEEG) Group
Letter

Keywords

Intensive Care Unit Burst Suppression Seizure Detection Intensive Care Unit Physician Neurointensive Care 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all NICU colleagues, NICU nurses, the neurophysiology technicians, and neurologists of the institutions for helping with the monitoring and for participating in the study.

Authors’ contributions

GC contributed to conception and design of the study. All of the authors contributed to acquisition and analysis of data for the work. LL performed the statistical analysis. LL and GC wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with input from all the co-authors.

Continuous quantified EEG in neuroIntensive care (CrazyEEG) group

Members of the CrazyEEG group are: Giuseppe Citerio, Adriana Patruno, Simone Beretta, Lucia Gandini, Francesca Sala, Daniela Mingone, Alessia Vargiolu, Graziella Bogliun, Jacopo Di Francesco, Luca Longhi, Barbara Frigeni, Maria Rosa Rottoli, Maria Curinga, Franco Ferri, and Roberto Ceriani.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to declare on this research.

Financial support

No external funding was received for this research.

Supplementary material

134_2017_4775_MOESM1_ESM.docx (242 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 241 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Claassen J, Taccone FS, Horn P et al (2013) Recommendations on the use of EEG monitoring in critically ill patients: consensus statement from the neurointensive care section of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 39:1337–1351. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2938-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, et al (2014) Consensus summary statement of the international multidisciplinary consensus conference on multimodality monitoring in neurocritical care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40:1189–1209. doi:  10.1007/s00134-014-3369-6
  3. 3.
    Herman ST, Abend NS, Bleck TP et al (2015) Consensus statement on continuous EEG in critically Ill adults and children, part II: personnel, technical specifications, and clinical practice. J Clin Neurophysiol 32:1–13. doi: 10.1097/wnp.0000000000000165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Purdon PL, Sampson A, Pavone KJ, Brown EN (2015) Clinical electroencephalography for anesthesiologists: part I: background and basic signatures. Anesthesiology 123:937–960. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000841 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Citerio
    • 1
    • 2
  • Adriana Patruno
    • 2
  • Simone Beretta
    • 5
  • Luca Longhi
    • 4
  • Barbara Frigeni
    • 3
  • Luca Lorini
    • 4
  • On behalf of Continuous Quantified EEG in NeuroIntensive Care (CrazyEEG) Group
  1. 1.School of Medicine and SurgeryUniversity of Milan–BicoccaMilanItaly
  2. 2.Neurointensive Care, San Gerardo HospitalAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale MonzaMonzaItaly
  3. 3.NeurologyAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIIIBergamoItaly
  4. 4.Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care MedicineAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIIIBergamoItaly
  5. 5.Neurology, San Gerardo HospitalAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale MonzaMonzaItaly

Personalised recommendations