Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 9, pp 1437–1444 | Cite as

The feasibility and safety of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to avoid intubation in patients with COPD unresponsive to noninvasive ventilation for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (ECLAIR study): multicentre case–control study

  • Stephan Braune
  • Annekatrin Sieweke
  • Franz Brettner
  • Thomas Staudinger
  • Michael Joannidis
  • Serge Verbrugge
  • Daniel Frings
  • Axel Nierhaus
  • Karl Wegscheider
  • Stefan KlugeEmail author
Original

Abstract

Introduction

The aim of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) by using extracorporeal CO2 removal (ECCO2R) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and acute hypercapnic respiratory failure refractory to noninvasive ventilation (NIV).

Methods

Case–control study. Patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure refractory to NIV being treated with a pump-driven veno-venous ECCO2R system (iLA-Activve®; Novalung, Heilbronn, Germany) were prospectively observed in five European intensive care units (ICU). Inclusion criteria were respiratory acidosis (pH ≤ 7.35, PaCO2 > 45 mmHg) with predefined criteria for endotracheal intubation (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01784367). The historical controls were patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure refractory to NIV who were treated with IMV. The matching criteria were main diagnosis, age, SAPS-II score and pH.

Results

Twenty-five cases (48.0 % male, mean age 67.3 years) were matched with 25 controls. Intubation was avoided in 14 patients (56.0 %) in the ECCO2R group with a mean extracorporeal blood flow of 1.3 L/min. Seven patients were intubated because of progressive hypoxaemia and four owing to ventilatory failure despite ECCO2R and NIV. Relevant ECCO2R-associated adverse events were observed in 11 patients (44.0 %), of whom 9 (36.0 %) suffered major bleeding complications. The mean time on IMV, ICU stay and hospital stay in the case and control groups were 8.3 vs. 13.7, 28.9 vs. 24.0 and 36.9 vs. 37.0 days, respectively, and the 90-day mortality rates were 28.0 vs. 28.0 %.

Conclusions

The use of veno-venous ECCO2R to avoid invasive mechanical ventilation was successful in just over half of the cases. However, relevant ECCO2R-associated complications occurred in over one-third of cases. Despite the shorter period of IMV in the ECCO2R group there were no significant differences in length of stay or in 28- and 90-day mortality rates between the two groups. Larger, randomised studies are warranted for further assessment of the effectiveness of ECCO2R.

Keywords

Endotracheal intubation Mechanical ventilation Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal COPD Hypercapnia Acute respiratory failure 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all involved ICU staff of the participating centres for their commitment and effort, without whom the ECLAIR study could not have been successfully completed. Our special thanks go to Birgit Füllekrug and Brigitte Singer, the ECLAIR study nurses in the Department of Intensive Care Medicine in the Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

SB, FB, TS, DF, and AN have received lecture honoraria from Novalung GmbH, Heilbronn, Germany. SK is a member of the advisory board of Novalung GmbH and therefore has received advisor honoraria. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

NOVALUNG GmbH (Heilbronn, Germany) provided all components of the extracorporeal circuit (iLA-Activve®) including cannulas. The company did not have any role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, preparing the report and any decision about its publication.

Supplementary material

134_2016_4452_MOESM1_ESM.docx (61 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 61 kb)
134_2016_4452_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (44 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (JPEG 44 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Nava S, Hill N (2009) Non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Lancet 374:250–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chandra D, Stamm JA, Taylor B, Ramos RM, Satterwhite L, Krishnan JA et al (2012) Outcomes of noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the United States, 1998–2008. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 185:152–159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindenauer PK, Stefan MS, Shieh MS, Pekow PS, Rothberg MB, Hill NS (2014) Outcomes associated with invasive and noninvasive ventilation among patients hospitalized with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA Intern Med 174:1982–1993CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schonhofer B (2015) Noninvasive ventilation in patients with persistent hypercapnia. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 110:182–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, Lofaso F, Conti G, Rauss A et al (1995) Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 333:817–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Squadrone E, Frigerio P, Fogliati C, Gregoretti C, Conti G, Antonelli M et al (2004) Noninvasive vs invasive ventilation in COPD patients with severe acute respiratory failure deemed to require ventilatory assistance. Intensive Care Med 30:1303–1310CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Confalonieri M, Garuti G, Cattaruzza MS, Osborn JF, Antonelli M, Conti G et al (2005) A chart of failure risk for noninvasive ventilation in patients with COPD exacerbation. Eur Respir J 25:348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinnell TG, Pilsworth S, Shneerson JM, Smith IE (2006) Prolonged invasive ventilation following acute ventilatory failure in COPD: weaning results, survival, and the role of noninvasive ventilation. Chest 129:133–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Conti G, Antonelli M, Navalesi P, Rocco M, Bufi M, Spadetta G et al (2002) Noninvasive vs. conventional mechanical ventilation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease after failure of medical treatment in the ward: a randomized trial. Intensive Care Med 28:1701–1707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schonhofer B, Euteneuer S, Nava S, Suchi S, Kohler D (2002) Survival of mechanically ventilated patients admitted to a specialised weaning centre. Intensive Care Med 28:908–916CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hajizadeh N, Goldfeld K, Crothers K (2015) What happens to patients with COPD with long-term oxygen treatment who receive mechanical ventilation for COPD exacerbation? A 1-year retrospective follow-up study. Thorax 70:294–296CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stefan MS, Nathanson BH, Higgins TL, Steingrub JS, Lagu T, Rothberg MB et al (2015) Comparative effectiveness of noninvasive and invasive ventilation in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Crit Care Med 43:1386–1394CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tremblay LN, Slutsky AS (2006) Ventilator-induced lung injury: from the bench to the bedside. Intensive Care Med 32:24–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Melsen WG, Rovers MM, Bonten MJ (2009) Ventilator-associated pneumonia and mortality: a systematic review of observational studies. Crit Care Med 37:2709–2718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jackson DL, Proudfoot CW, Cann KF, Walsh T (2010) A systematic review of the impact of sedation practice in the ICU on resource use, costs and patient safety. Crit Care 14:R59CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jaber S, Jung B, Matecki S, Petrof BJ (2011) Clinical review: ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction-human studies confirm animal model findings! Crit Care 15:206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ward NS, Dushay KM (2008) Clinical concise review: mechanical ventilation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Crit Care Med 36:1614–1619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Braune SA, Kluge S (2013) Extracorporeal lung support in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Minerva Anestesiol 79:934–943PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crotti S, Lissoni A, Tubiolo D, Azzari S, Tarsia P, Caspani L et al (2012) Artificial lung as an alternative to mechanical ventilation in COPD exacerbation. Eur Respir J 39:212–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Burki NK, Mani RK, Herth FJ, Schmidt W, Teschler H, Bonin F et al (2013) A novel extracorporeal CO2 removal system: results of a pilot study of hypercapnic respiratory failure in patients with COPD. Chest 143:678–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kluge S, Braune SA, Engel M, Nierhaus A, Frings D, Ebelt H et al (2012) Avoiding invasive mechanical ventilation by extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients failing noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 38:1632–1639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Del Sorbo L, Pisani L, Filippini C, Fanelli V, Fasano L, Terragni P et al (2015) Extracorporeal CO2 removal in hypercapnic patients at risk of noninvasive ventilation failure: a matched cohort study with historical control. Crit Care Med 43:120–127CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hermann A, Riss K, Schellongowski P, Bojic A, Wohlfarth P, Robak O et al (2015) A novel pump-driven veno-venous gas exchange system during extracorporeal CO2-removal. Intensive Care Med 41:1773–1780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hermann A, Staudinger T, Bojic A, Riss K, Wohlfarth P, Robak O et al (2014) First experience with a new miniaturized pump-driven venovenous extracorporeal CO2 removal system (iLA Activve): a retrospective data analysis. ASAIO J 60:342–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Schulman S, Kearon C (2005) Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients. J Thromb Haemost 3:692–694CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pisani L, Fasano L, Corcione N, Comellini V, Guerrieri A, Ranieri MV et al (2015) Effects of extracorporeal CO2 removal on inspiratory effort and respiratory pattern in patients who fail weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 192:1392–1394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mani RK, Schmidt W, Lund LW, Herth FJ (2013) Respiratory dialysis for avoidance of intubation in acute exacerbation of COPD. ASAIO J 59:675–678CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Spinelli E, Crotti S, Zachetti L, Bottino N, Berto V, Russo R et al (2013) Effect of extracorporeal CO2 removal on respiratory rate in spontaneously breathing patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation. Crit Care 17(Suppl 2):P128CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sklar MC, Beloncle F, Katsios CM, Brochard L, Friedrich JO (2015) Extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 41:1752–1762CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Karagiannidis C, Kampe KA, Sipmann FS, Larsson A, Hedenstierna G, Windisch W et al (2014) Veno-venous extracorporeal CO2 removal for the treatment of severe respiratory acidosis: pathophysiological and technical considerations. Crit Care 18:R124CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gray BW, Haft JW, Hirsch JC, Annich GM, Hirschl RB, Bartlett RH (2015) Extracorporeal life support: experience with 2000 patients. ASAIO J 61:2–7CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gorlinger K, Bergmann L, Dirkmann D (2012) Coagulation management in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 26:179–198CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kalbhenn J, Wittau N, Schmutz A, Zieger B, Schmidt R (2015) Identification of acquired coagulation disorders and effects of target-controlled coagulation factor substitution on the incidence and severity of spontaneous intracranial bleeding during veno-venous ECMO therapy. Perfusion 30:675–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    John S, Willam C (2015) Lung and kidney failure: pathogenesis, interactions, and therapy. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 110:452–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Forster C, Schriewer J, John S, Eckardt KU, Willam C (2013) Low-flow CO2 removal integrated into a renal-replacement circuit can reduce acidosis and decrease vasopressor requirements. Crit Care 17:R154CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lee DS, Chung CR, Jeon K, Park CM, Suh GY, Song YB et al (2015) Survival after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation on weekends in comparison with weekdays. Ann Thorac Surg 101:133–140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Abrams DC, Brenner K, Burkart KM, Agerstrand CL, Thomashow BM, Bacchetta M et al (2013) Pilot study of extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal to facilitate extubation and ambulation in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 10:307–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephan Braune
    • 1
  • Annekatrin Sieweke
    • 1
  • Franz Brettner
    • 2
  • Thomas Staudinger
    • 3
  • Michael Joannidis
    • 4
  • Serge Verbrugge
    • 5
  • Daniel Frings
    • 1
  • Axel Nierhaus
    • 1
  • Karl Wegscheider
    • 6
  • Stefan Kluge
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Intensive Care MedicineUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Intensive Care MedicineHospital Barmherzige BruederMunichGermany
  3. 3.Department of Medicine I, General Hospital ViennaMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria
  4. 4.Division of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  5. 5.Department of Intensive Care MedicineSt. Franciscus-HospitalRotterdamThe Netherlands
  6. 6.Department of Medical Biometry and EpidemiologyUniversity Medical Center Hamburg-EppendorfHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations