Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 505–520 | Cite as

Antithrombin III for critically ill patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

  • Mikkel AllingstrupEmail author
  • Jørn Wetterslev
  • Frederikke B. Ravn
  • Ann Merete Møller
  • Arash Afshari
Systematic Review

Abstract

Purpose

Antithrombin III (AT III) is an anticoagulant with anti-inflammatory properties. We assessed the benefits and harms of AT III in critically ill patients.

Methods

We searched from inception to 27 August 2015 in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CAB, BIOSIS and CINAHL. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) irrespective of publication status, date of publication, blinding status, outcomes published or language.

Results

We included 30 RCTs with a total of 3933 participants. The majority of included trials were at high risk of bias. Combining all trials, regardless of bias, showed no statistically significant effect of AT III on mortality (RR 0.95, 95 % CI 0.88–1.03, I 2 = 0 %, fixed-effect model, 29 trials, 3882 participants). Among those with severe sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), AT III showed no impact on mortality (RR 0.95, 95 % Cl 0.88–1.03, I 2 = 0 %, fixed-effect model, 12 trials, 2858 participants). We carried out multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the benefits and harms of AT III and to examine the impact of risk of bias. AT III significantly increased bleeding events (RR 1.58, 95 % CI 1.35–1.84, I 2 = 0 %, fixed-effect model, 11 trials, 3019 participants). However, for all other outcome measures and analyses, the results did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

There is insufficient evidence to support AT III substitution in any category of critically ill participants including those with sepsis and DIC. AT III did not show an impact on mortality, but increased the risk of bleeding.

Keywords

Antithrombin III Bleeding DIC Multi organ failure Sepsis Septic shock 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

Mikkel Allingstrup, Frederikke B. Ravn, Ann Merete Møller and Arash Afshari declare that there are no conflicts of interest. Jørn Wetterslev declares that he is a member of the task force on TSA at Copenhagen Trial Unit developing and programming TSA.

Supplementary material

134_2016_4225_MOESM1_ESM.doc (794 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 794 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Wunsch H, Angus D, Harrison D et al (2008) Variation in critical care services across North America and Western Europe. Crit Care Med 36:2787–2793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Levi M, De Jonge E, Van der Poll T (2004) New treatment strategies for disseminated intravascular coagulation based on current understanding of the pathophysiology. Ann Med 36:41–49CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mayr F, Yende S, Angus D (2014) Epidemiology of severe sepsis. Virulence 5:4–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Periti P (2000) Current treatment of sepsis and endotoxaemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother 1:1203–1217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Polderman KH, Girbes ARJ (2004) Drug intervention trials in sepsis: divergent results. Lancet 363:1721–1723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Becker BF, Heindl B, Kupatt C, Zahler S (2000) Endothelial function and hemostasis. Z Kardiol 89:160–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diaz R, Moffett BS, Karabinas S et al (2015) Antithrombin concentrate use in children receiving unfractionated heparin for acute thrombosis. J Pediatr 167:645–649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Opal SM, Kessler CM, Roemisch J, Knaub S (2002) Antithrombin, heparin, and heparan sulfate. Crit Care Med 30:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rublee D, Opal SM, Schramm W et al (2002) Quality of life effects of antithrombin III in sepsis survivors: results from the KyberSept trial. Crit Care 6:349–356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zarychanski R, Abou-Setta AM, Kanji S et al (2015) The efficacy and safety of heparin in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Crit Care Med 43:511–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Higgins JPT, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration. http://www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed March 2011
  14. 14.
    Afshari A, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Møller A (2008) Antithrombin III for critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 16(3):5370Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    The Cochrane Collaboration (2014) Review Manager (RevMan), version 5.3.5. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thorlund K, Engstrøm J, Wetterslev J, Brok J, Imberger G, Gluud C (2011) User manual for trial sequential analysis (TSA). Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen, Denmark, pp 1–115. http://www.ctu.dk/tsa/files/tsa_manual.pdf
  17. 17.
    Albert J, Blomqvist H, Gardlund B et al (1992) Effect of antithrombin concentrate on haemostatic variables in critically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 36:745–752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Balk RA, Bedrosian C, McCormick L et al (1995) Prospective double blind placebo-controlled trial of ATIII substitution in sepsis. Intensive Care Med 21:17Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baudo F, DeGasperi A, De Cataldo F et al (1992) Antithrombin III supplementation during orthotopic liver transplantation in cirrhotic patients: a randomized trial. Thromb Res 68:409–416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Baudo F, Caimi TM, De Cataldo F et al (1998) Antithrombin III (ATIII) replacement therapy in patients with severe sepsis and/or postsurgical complications: a controlled double-blind, randomized, multicenter study. Intensive Care Med 24:336–342CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blauhut B, Kramar H, Vinazzer H, Bergmann H (1985) Substitution of antithrombin III in shock and DIC: a randomized study. Thromb Res 39:81–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Diaz-Cremades JM, Lorenzo R, Sánchez M et al (1994) Use of antithrombin III in critical patients. Intensive Care Med 20:577–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eisele B, Lamy M, Thijs LG et al (1998) Antithrombin III in patients with severe sepsis. A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind multicenter trial plus a meta-analysis on all randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials with antithrombin III in severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med 24:663–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fourrier F, Chopin C, Huart JJ et al (1993) Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of antithrombin III concentrates in septic shock with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Chest 104:882–888CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fulia F, Cordaro S, Meo P et al (2003) Can the administration of antithrombin III decrease the risk of cerebral hemorrhage in premature infants. Biol Neonate 83:1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gando S, Saitoh D, Ishikura H et al (2013) A randomized, controlled, multicenter trial of the effects of antithrombin on disseminated intravascular coagulation in patients with sepsis. Crit Care 17:297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grenander A, Bredbacka S, Rydvall A et al (2001) Antithrombin treatment in patients with traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 13:49–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Haire WD, Ruby EI, Stephens LC et al (1998) A prospective randomized double-blind trial of antithrombin III concentrate in the treatment of multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 4:142–150CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Harper PL, Williamson L, Park G et al (1991) A pilot study of antithrombin replacement in intensive care management: the effects on mortality, coagulation and renal function. Transfus Med 1:121–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Inthorn D, Hoffmann JN, Hartl WH et al (1997) Antithrombin III supplementation in severe sepsis: beneficial effects on organ dysfunction. Shock 8:328–334CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kobayashi T, Terao T, Ikenoue T et al (2003) Treatment of severe preeclampsia with antithrombin concentrate: results of a prospective feasibility study. Semin Thromb Hemost 29:645–652CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Langley PG, Hughes RD, Forbes A et al (1993) Controlled trial of antithrombin III supplementation in fulminant hepatic failure. J Hepatol 17:326–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lavrentieva A, Kontakiotis T, Bitzani M et al (2008) The efficacy of antithrombin administration in the acute phase of burn injury. Thromb Haemost 100:286–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maki M, Kobayashi T, Terao T et al (2000) Antithrombin therapy for severe preeclampsia: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Thromb Haemost 84:583–590PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mitchell L, Andrew M, Hanna K et al (2003) Trend to efficacy and safety using antithrombin concentrate in prevention of thrombosis in children receiving l-asparaginase for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Results of the PAARKA study. Thromb Haemost 90:235–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Muntean W, Rossegger H (1989) Antithrombin III concentrate in preterm infants with IRDS: an open, controlled, randomized clinical trial (abstract). Thromb Haemost 62:288Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Neporada E, Vorobyeva N, Nedashkovsky E (2008) Antithrombin III deficiency correction in patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation. Obshaya Reanimatol 5:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nishiyama T, Kohno Y, Koishi K (2012) Effects of antithrombin and gabexate mesilate on disseminated intravascular coagulation: a preliminary study. Am J Emerg Med 30:1219–1223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Palareti G, Legnani C, Coccheri S et al (1995) Laboratory effects of antithrombin-III (ATIII) replacement in patients with sepsis and or postsurgical complications requiring hemodynamic and or respiratory support—a controlled, double-blind, randomized multicenter study. Thromb Haemost 73:1251Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schmidt B, Gillie P, Mitchell L et al (1998) A placebo-controlled randomized trial of antithrombin therapy in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:470–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Schorr M, Siebeck M, Zugel N et al (2000) Antithrombin III and local serum application: adjuvant therapy in peritonitis. Eur J Clin Invest 30:359–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Schuster HP, Eisele B, Keinecke HO et al (1997) S-AT III study: antithrombin III in patients with sepsis. Intensive Care Med 23(Suppl 1):76Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Smith-Erichsen N, Aasen AO, Kongsgaard UE et al (1996) The effect of antithrombin III substitution therapy on components of the plasma protease systems in surgical patients. Clin Intensive Care 7:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Vorobyeva N, Neporada E, Turundaevskaia O, Mel’nikova G (2007) Place of antithrombin III concentrate in the intensive care of disseminated intravascular coagulation. Anesteziol Reanimatol 2:42–44Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Warren BL, Eid A, Singer P et al (2001) Caring for the critically ill patient. High-dose antithrombin III in severe sepsis, a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 286:1869–1878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Waydhas C, Nast-Kolb D, Gippner-Steppert C et al (1998) High-dose antithrombin III treatment of severely injured patients: results of a prospective study. J Trauma 45:931–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    D’Angelo A, Valsecchi L (2015) High-dose antithrombin supplementation in early pre-eclampsia: a double-blind, placebo controlled study (on behalf of the AT III-EPAS study group). http://abstract.mci-group.com/cgi-bin/mc/printabs.pl?APP=ISTH2009ABS-abstract&TEMPLATE=&keyf=0771&showHide=show&client. Accessed 21 April 2015
  48. 48.
    Gotzsche PC (2000) Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis. It may be crucially important for patients. BMJ 321:585–586CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mikkel Allingstrup
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Jørn Wetterslev
    • 3
  • Frederikke B. Ravn
    • 2
  • Ann Merete Møller
    • 4
  • Arash Afshari
    • 2
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesia, Køge SygehusCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Department of Paediatric and Obstetric Anaesthesia, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department 7812, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalCopenhagenDenmark
  4. 4.The Cochrane Anaesthesia, Critical and Emergency Care GroupUniversity of Copenhagen Herlev HospitalHerlevDenmark

Personalised recommendations