Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 316–323 | Cite as

Normocaloric versus hypocaloric feeding on the outcomes of ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Paul E. Marik
  • Michael H. Hooper
Systematic Review

Abstract

Introduction

Current clinical practice guidelines recommend providing ICU patients a daily caloric intake estimated to match 80–100 % of energy expenditure (normocaloric goals). However, recent clinical trials of intentional hypocaloric feeding question this approach.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the outcomes of ICU patients randomized to intentional hypocaloric or normocaloric goals. We included randomized controlled trials that enrolled ICU patients and compared intentional hypocaloric with normocaloric nutritional goals. We included studies that evaluated both trophic feeding as well as permissive underfeeding. Data sources included MEDLINE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials and citation review of relevant primary and review articles. The outcomes of interest included hospital acquired infection, hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS) and ventilator-free days (VFDs).

Results

Six studies which enrolled 2517 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age and body mass index (BMI) across the studies were 53 ± 5 years and 29.1 ± 1.5 kg/m2, respectively. Two studies compared normocaloric feeding (77 % of goal) with trophic feeding (20 % of goal), while four studies compared normocaloric feeding (72 % of goal) with permissive underfeeding (49 % of goal). Overall, there was no significant difference in the risk of infectious complications (OR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.84–1.27, I 2 = 16 %), hospital mortality (OR 0.91; 95 % CI 0.75–1.11, I 2 = 8 %) or ICU LOS (mean difference 0.05 days; 95 % CI 1.33–1.44 days; I 2 = 37 %) between groups. VFDs were reported in three studies with no significant difference between the normocaloric and intentional hypocaloric groups (data not pooled).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated no difference in the risk of acquired infections, hospital mortality, ICU length of stay or ventilator-free days between patients receiving intentional hypocaloric as compared to normocaloric nutritional goals.

Keywords

Enteral nutrition Permissive underfeeding Trophic feeding Caloric goals 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interests

None.

Supplementary material

134_2015_4131_MOESM1_ESM.docx (393 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 392 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Casaer MP, van den Berghe G (2014) Nutrition in the acute phase of critical illness. N Engl J Med 370:1227–1236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P, Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P (2003) Canadian Clinical Practice Guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 27:355–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B, Ochoa JB, Napolitano L, Cresci G (2009) Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). J Parenter Enteral Nutr 33:277–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Lemieux M, Drover J, Jurewitsch B, Greenwood J, Kutsogiannis J, McCall M, Pagliarello G, Wynn C, Garrel D, Gramlich L, Rahman A, Jeejeebhoy K, Macdonald G, Muscedere J (2015) Canadian clinical practice guidelines. http://www.criticalcarenutrition.com/2015. Accessed 9 Sep 2015
  5. 5.
    Kreymann KG, Berger MM, Deutz NE, Hiesmayr M, Jolliet P, Kazandjiev G, Nitenberg G, van den Berghe G, Wernerman J, Ebner C, Hartl W, Heymann C, Spies C, DGEM (German Society for Nutritional Medicine) (2006) ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr 25:210–223CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alberda C, Gramlich L, Jones N, Jeejeebhoy K, Day AG, Dhaliwal R, Heyland DK (2009) The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an International Multicenter Observational Study. Intensive Care Med 35:1728–1737CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elke G, Wang M, Weiler N, Day AG, Heyland DK (2014) Close to recommended caloric and protein intake by enteral nutrition is associated with better clinical outcome of critically ill septic patients: secondary analysis of a large International Nutrition Databse. Crit Care 18:R29PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Artinian V, Krayem H, DiGiovine B (2006) Effects of early enteral feeding on the outcome of critically ill mechanically ventilated medical patients. Chest 129:960–967CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weijs PJ, Stapel SN, de Groot SD, Driessen RH, de Jong E, Girbes AR, van Strack Schijndel RJ, Beishuizen A (2012) Optimal protein and energy nutrition decreases mortality in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a prospective observational cohort study. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Faisy C, Lerolle N, Dachraoui F, Savard JF, Abboud I, Tadie JM, Fagon JY (2009) Impact of energy deficit calculated by a predictive method on outcome in medical patients requiring prolonged acute mechanical ventilation. Br J Nutr 101:1079–1087CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Singer P, Pichard C, Heidegger CP, Wernerman J (2010) Considering energy deficit in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 13:170–176CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339:b2535PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Higgins JP and Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. www.cochrane-handbook.org. Accessed 15 July 2015
  15. 15.
    Rice TW, Morgan S, Hays MA, Bernard GR, Jensen GL, Wheeler AP (2011) A randomized trial of initial trophic versus full-energy enteral nutrition in mechanically ventilated patients with acute respiratory failure. Crit Care Med 39:967–974PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Thompson BT, Steingrub J, Hite RD, Moss M, Morris A, Dong N, Rock P (2012) Initial trophic vs full enteral feeding in patients with acute lung injury. The EDEN randomized trial. JAMA 307:795–803CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cochran W (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10:101–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berlin JA, Laird NM, Sacks HS, Chalmers TC (1989) A comparison of statistical methods for combining event rates from clinical trials. Stat Med 8:141–151CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Egger M, Smith GD (1998) Bias in location and selection of studies. Br Med J 316:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biljana M, Jelena M, Branislav J, Milorad R, Biljana M, Jelena M, Branislav J, Milorad R (1999) Bias in meta-analysis and funnel plot asymmetry. Stud Health Technol Informat 68:323–328Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Arabi YM, Tamim HM, Dhar GS, Al-Dawood A, Al-Sultan M, Sakkijha MH, Kahoul SH, Brits R (2011) Permissive underfeeding and intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 93:569–577CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Arabi YM, Aldawood AS, Haddad SH, Al-Dorzi HM, Tamim HM, Jones G, Mehta S, McIntyre L (2015) Permissive underfeeding or standard enteral feeding in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med 372:2398–2408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Charles EJ, Petroze RT, Metzger R, Hranjec T, Rosenberger LH, Riccio LM, McLeod MD, Guidry CA, Stukenborg GJ, Swenson BR, Willcutts KF, O’Donnell KB, Sawyer RG (2014) Hypocaloric compared with eucaloric nutritionaql support and its effect on infection rates in a surgical intensive care unit: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr 100:1337–1343PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Petros S, Horbach M, Seidel F, Weidhase L (2015) Hypocaloric vs normocaloric nutrition in critically ill patients: a prospective randomized trial. J Parenter Enteral Nutr . doi: 10.1177/0148607114528980 Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xu Y, Eissa NT (2010) Autophagy in innate and adaptive immunity. Proc Am Thorac Soc 7:22–28PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rich KA, Burkett C, Webster P (2003) Cytoplasmic bacteria can be targets for autophagy. Cell Microbiol 5:455–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Levine B, Mizushima N, Virgin HN (2011) Autophagy immun inflamm. Nature 469:323–335PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Marik PE, Bellomo R (2013) Stress hyperglycemia: an essential survival response! Crit Care 17:305PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tappy L, Schwarz JM, Schneiter P, Cayeux C, Revelly JP, Fagerquist C, Jequier E, Chiolero R (1998) Effects of isoenergetic glucose-based or lipid-based parenteral nutrition on glucose metabolism, de novo lipogenesis, and respiratory gas exchanges in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 26:860–867CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CM (2003) One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 348:683–693CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matte A, Tomlionson G, Diaz-Granados N, Cooper A, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta A (2011) Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 364:1293–1304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hoffer LJ, Bistrian BR (2013) Why critically ill patients are protein deprived. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 37:300–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Needham DM, Dinglas VD, Morris PE, Jackson JC, Hough CL, Mendez-Tellez PA, Wozniak AW, Colantuoni E, Ely EW, Rice TW, Hopkins RO (2013) Physical and cognitive performance of acute lung injury patients one year after initial trophic vs full enteral feeding: EDEN trial follow-up. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 188:567–576PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Needham DM, Dinglas VD, Bienvenu OJ, Colantuoni E, Wozniak AW, Rice TW, Hopkins RO (2013) One-year outcomes in patients with acute lung injury randomised to initial trophic or full enteral feeding: prospective follow-up of EDEN randomised trial. BMJ 346:f1532PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heyland DK, Murch L, Cahill N, McCall M, Muscedere J, Stelfox HT, Bray T, Tanguay T, Jiang X, Day AG (2013) Enhanced protein-energy provision via the enteral route feeding protocol in critically ill patients: results of a cluster randomized trial. Crit Care Med 41:2743–2753CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Braunschweig CA, Sheean PM, Peterson SJ, Perez SG, Freels S, Lateef O, Gurka D, Fantuzzi G (2015) Intensive nutrition in acute lung injury: a clinical trial (INTACT). J Parenter Enteral Nutr 39:13–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Asarian L, Langhans W (2010) A new look on brain mechanisms of acute illness anorexia. Physiol Behav 100:464–471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Langhans W (2007) Signals generating anorexia during acute illness. Proc Nutr Soc 66:321–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Choi AM, Ryter SW, Levine B (2013) Autophagy in human health and disease. N Engl J Med 368:651–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gazzaneo MC, Suryawan A, Orellana RA, Torrazza RM, El-Kadi SW, Wilson FA, Kimball SR, Srivastava N, Nguyen HV, Fiorotto ML, Davis TA (2011) Intermittent bolus feeding has a greater stimulatory effect on protein synthesis in skeletal muscle than continuous feeding in neonatal pigs. J Nutr 141:2152–2158PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Stoll B, Puiman PJ, Cui L, Chang X, Benight NM, Bauchart-Thevret C, Hartmann B, Holst JJ, Burrin DG (2012) Continuous parenteral and enteral nutrition induces metabolic dysfunction in neonatal pigs. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 36:538–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chowdhury AH, Murray K, Hoad CL, Costigan C, Marciani L, MacDonald IA, Bowling TE, Lobo DN (2015) Effects of bolus and continuous nasogastric feeding on gastric emptying, small bowel water content, superior mesenteric artery blood flow, and plasma hormone concentrations in heathy adults. A randomized crossover study, Ann Surg (in press)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Marik PE (2015) Feeding critically ill patients the right “whey”:thinking outside the box. Ann Intensive Care 5:11PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wischmeyer PE (2015) Ensuring optimal survival and post-ICU qulaity of life in high-risk ICU patients: permissive underfeeding is not safe! Crit Care Med 43:1769–1772CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care MedicineEastern Virginia Medical SchoolNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations