Visualizing the pressure and time burden of intracranial hypertension in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury
- 1.5k Downloads
To assess the impact of the duration and intensity of episodes of increased intracranial pressure on 6-month neurological outcome in adult and paediatric traumatic brain injury.
Analysis of prospectively collected minute-by-minute intracranial pressure and mean arterial blood pressure data of 261 adult and 99 paediatric traumatic brain injury patients from multiple European centres. The relationship of episodes of elevated intracranial pressure (defined as a pressure above a certain threshold during a certain time) with 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale was visualized in a colour-coded plot.
The colour-coded plot illustrates the intuitive concept that episodes of higher intracranial pressure can only be tolerated for shorter durations: the curve that delineates the duration and intensity of those intracranial pressure episodes associated with worse outcome is an approximately exponential decay curve. In children, the curve resembles that of adults, but the delineation between episodes associated with worse outcome occurs at lower intracranial pressure thresholds. Intracranial pressures above 20 mmHg lasting longer than 37 min in adults, and longer than 8 min in children, are associated with worse outcomes. In a multivariate model, together with known baseline risk factors for outcome in severe traumatic brain injury, the cumulative intracranial pressure–time burden is independently associated with mortality. When cerebrovascular autoregulation, assessed with the low-frequency autoregulation index, is impaired, the ability to tolerate elevated intracranial pressures is reduced. When the cerebral perfusion pressure is below 50 mmHg, all intracranial pressure insults, regardless of duration, are associated with worse outcome.
The intracranial pressure–time burden associated with worse outcome is visualised in a colour-coded plot. In children, secondary injury occurs at lower intracranial pressure thresholds as compared to adults. Impaired cerebrovascular autoregulation reduces the ability to tolerate intracranial pressure insults. Thus, 50 mmHg might be the lower acceptable threshold for cerebral perfusion pressure.
KeywordsTraumatic brain injury Adults Children Intracranial pressure Cerebral perfusion pressure Cerebrovascular autoregulation
We wish to acknowledge the non-co-author members of the BrainIT steering group: Barbara Gregson, Tim Howells, Karl Kiening, Julia Mattern, Arminas Ragauskas and Juan Sahuquillo, for collecting data and granting permission through the steering group to use them for this project. Similarly, we would also like to acknowledge the contributors to the original study resulting in the paediatric database used here: R.J. Forsyth, B. Fulton, P.J.D. Andrews, A.D. Mendelow and R.A. Minns. The present study was supported by the Foundation for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO) (Research project G. 0904.11). Geert Meyfroidt receives funding from FWO as senior clinical investigator (1846113N). Greet Van den Berghe receives long-term structural research financing via the Methusalem program funded by the Flemish Government (METH/08/07). BrainIT was funded by the European Framework Programme (FP5-QLRI-2000-00454, QLGT-2002-00160 AND FP7-IST-2007-217049). The NEMO project in the University Hospital Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium was funded by the Flemish Government Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT)—Applied Biomedical Research (TBM) program.
Conflicts of interest
We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Hydera AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC (2007) The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation 22:341–353Google Scholar
- 5.Guillaume J, Janny P (1951) Continuous intracranial manometry; importance of the method and first results. Rev Neurol (Paris) 84:131–142Google Scholar
- 7.Brain Trauma Foundation, American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS), Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), AANS/CNS Joint Section on Neurotrauma and Critical Care (2007) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. VI. Indications for intracranial pressure monitoring. J Neurotrauma 24(Suppl 1):S37–S44Google Scholar
- 9.Narayan RK, Kishore PR, Becker DP, Ward JD, Enas GG, Greenberg RP, Domingues Da Silva A, Lipper MH, Choi SC, Mayhall CG, Lutz HA 3rd, Young HF (1982) Intracranial pressure: to monitor or not to monitor? A review of our experience with severe head injury. J Neurosurg 56(5):650–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Marmarou A, Anderson RL, Ward JD, Choi SC, Young HF, Eisenberg HM, Foulkes MA, Marshall LF, Jane JA (1991) Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma. J Neurosurg 75:S59–S66Google Scholar
- 18.Adelson PD, Bratton SL, Carney NA, Chesnut RM, du Coudray HE, Goldstein B, Kochanek PM, Miller HC, Partington MP, Selden NR, Warden CR, Wright DW (2003) Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children and adolescents. Pediatr Crit Care Med 4(3):S72–S75PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Cooper DJ, Rosenfeld JV, Murray L, Arabi YM, Davies AR, D’Urso P, Kossmann T, Ponsford J, Seppelt I, Reilly P, Wolfe R, DECRA Trial Investigators, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group (2011) Decompressive craniectomy in diffuse traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 364:1493–1502PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, Barber J, Machamer J, Chaddock K, Celix JM, Cherner M, Hendrix T (2012) A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med 367:2471–2481PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Le Roux P, Menon DK, Citerio G, Vespa P, Bader MK, Brophy GM, Diringer MN, Stocchetti N, Videtta W, Armonda R, Badjatia N, Böesel J, Chesnut R, Chou S, Claassen J, Czosnyka M, De Georgia M, Figaji A, Fugate J, Helbok R, Horowitz D, Hutchinson P, Kumar M, McNett M, Miller C, Naidech A, Oddo M, Olson D, O’Phelan K, Provencio JJ, Puppo C, Riker R, Robertson C, Schmidt M, Taccone F (2014) Consensus summary statement of the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring in Neurocritical Care: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40(9):1189–1209PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Güiza F, Depreitere B, Lo TY, Jones PA, Chambers IR, Van den Berghe G, Meyfroidt G (2014) Visualizing secondary insults of elevated ICP in pediatric TBI. Intensive Care Med 40(Suppl 1):S18;0037Google Scholar
- 30.Nilsson P, Enblad P, Chambers I (2005) Survey of traumatic brain injury management in European Brain-IT centres year 2001. Acta Neurochir (Suppl) 95:51–53Google Scholar
- 31.Depreitere B, Güiza F, Van den Berghe G, Schuhmann MU, Maier G, Piper I, Meyfroidt G (2014) Pressure autoregulation monitoring and cerebral perfusion pressure target recommendation in severe traumatic brain injury patients based on minute-by-minute monitoring data. J Neurosurg 120:1451–1457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, Butcher I, Lu J, McHugh GS, Murray GD, Marmarou A, Roberts I, Habbema JD, Maas AI (2008) Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and international validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteristics. PLoS Med 5(8):e165PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.IMPACT: International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in TBI (2015) http://www.tbi-impact.org/. Accessed 11 March 2015
- 38.CENTER-TBI (2015) https://www.center-tbi.eu/. Accessed 6 March 2015
- 39.Chesnut RM (2015) What the BEST TRIP study means to me as the principle investigator. https://www.braintrauma.org/dr-chesnut-commentary/. Accessed 24 March 2015