Mechanisms of the effects of prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome
- 5.5k Downloads
Prone positioning has been used for many years in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The initial reason for prone positioning in ARDS patients was improvement in oxygenation. It was later shown that mechanical ventilation in the prone position can be less injurious to the lung and hence the primary reason to use prone positioning is prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI).
Material and methods
A large body of physiologic benefits of prone positioning in ARDS patients accumulated but these failed to translate into clinical benefits. More recently, meta-analyses and randomized controlled trial in a specific subgroup of ARDS patients demonstrated that prone positioning can improve survival. This review covers the effects of prone positioning on oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, and VILI.
We conclude with the effects of prone positioning on patient outcome, in particular on survival.
KeywordsAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) Prone position Mechanical ventilation Ventilator-induced lung injury
Conflicts of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
- 13.Tawhai MH, Nash MP, Lin CL, Hoffman EA (1985) Supine and prone differences in regional lung density and pleural pressure gradients in the human lung with constant shape. J Appl Physiol 2009(107):912–920Google Scholar
- 24.Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT et al (2012) Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin definition. JAMA 307:E1–E8Google Scholar
- 34.Bull TM, Clark B, McFann K, Moss M, National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Network (2010) Pulmonary vascular dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes in patients with acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182:1123–1128PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar