Capillary refill time exploration during septic shock
- 3.4k Downloads
During septic shock management, the evaluation of microvascular perfusion by skin analysis is of interest. We aimed to study the skin capillary refill time (CRT) in a selected septic shock population.
We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary teaching hospital. After a preliminary study to calculate CRT reproducibility, all consecutive patients with septic shock during a 10-month period were included. After initial resuscitation at 6 h (H6), we recorded hemodynamic parameters and analyzed their predictive value on 14-day mortality. CRT was measured on the index finger tip and on the knee area.
CRT was highly reproducible with an excellent inter-rater concordance calculated at 80 % [73–86] for index CRT and 95 % [93–98] for knee CRT. A total of 59 patients were included, SOFA score was 10 [7–14], SAPS II was 61 [50–78] and 14-day mortality rate was 36 %. CRT measured at both sites was significantly higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (respectively 5.6 ± 3.5 vs 2.3 ± 1.8 s, P < 0.0001 for index CRT and 7.6 ± 4.6 vs 2.9 ± 1.7 s, P < 0.0001 for knee CRT). The CRT at H6 was strongly predictive of 14-day mortality as the area under the curve was 84 % [75–94] for the index measurement and was 90 % [83–98] for the knee area. A threshold of index CRT at 2.4 s predicted 14-day outcome with a sensitivity of 82 % (95 % CI [60–95]) and a specificity of 73 % (95 % CI [56–86]). A threshold of knee CRT at 4.9 s predicted 14-day outcome with a sensitivity of 82 % (95 % CI [60–95]) and a specificity of 84 % (95 % CI [68–94]). CRT was significantly related to tissue perfusion parameters such as arterial lactate level and SOFA score. Finally, CRT changes during shock resuscitation were significantly associated with prognosis.
CRT is a clinical reproducible parameter when measured on the index finger tip or the knee area. After initial resuscitation of septic shock, CRT is a strong predictive factor of 14-day mortality.
KeywordsShock Microcirculation Prognosis Capillary time refill Intensive care medicine
Conflicts of interest
The authors had no conflict of interest.
- 2.Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R, Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including the Pediatric Subgroup (2013) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 39(2):165–228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.De Backer D, Donadello K, Sakr Y, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Scolletta S, Vincent JL (2013) Microcirculatory alterations in patients with severe sepsis: impact of time of assessment and relationship with outcome. Crit Care Med 41(3):791–799. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182742e8b PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Vic-Dupont V, Coulaud JP, Carbon C (1968) Le choc au cours des infections (signes et étiologies). Les journées de réanimation de l’Hôpital Claude Bernard, Libraries Arnette edn., ParisGoogle Scholar
- 11.Gove S, Tamburlini G, Molyneux E, Whitesell P, Campbell H (1999) Development and technical basis of simplified guidelines for emergency triage assessment and treatment in developing countries. WHO integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) referral care project. Arch Dis Child 81(6):473–477PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Evans JA, May J, Ansong D, Antwi S, Asafo-Adjei E, Nguah SB, Osei-Kwakye K, Akoto AO, Ofori AO, Sambian D, Sylverken J, Busch W, Timmann C, Agbenyega T, Horstmann RD (2006) Capillary refill time as an independent prognostic indicator in severe and complicated malaria. J Pediatr 149(5):676–681. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2006.07.040 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hernandez G, Pedreros C, Veas E, Bruhn A, Romero C, Rovegno M, Neira R, Bravo S, Castro R, Kattan E, Ince C (2012) Evolution of peripheral vs metabolic perfusion parameters during septic shock resuscitation. A clinical-physiologic study. J Crit Care 27(3):283–288. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.024 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Thijs L, Takala J, Sprung C, Antonelli M, Bruining H, Willatts S (1999) The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems of the ESICM. Intensive Care Med 25(7):686–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ait-Oufella H, Joffre J, Boelle PY, Galbois A, Bourcier S, Baudel JL, Margetis D, Alves M, Offenstadt G, Guidet B, Maury E (2012) Knee area tissue oxygen saturation is predictive of 14-day mortality in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 38(6):976–983. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2555-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Oppert M, Engel C, Brunkhorst FM, Bogatsch H, Reinhart K, Frei U, Eckardt KU, Loeffler M, John S (2008) Acute renal failure in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock–a significant independent risk factor for mortality: results from the German prevalence study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 23(3):904–909. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm610 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar