Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 160–170 | Cite as

Accumulation of hydroxyethyl starch in human and animal tissues: a systematic review

Systematic Review

Abstract

Purpose

To systematically review clinical and preclinical data on hydroxyethyl starch (HES) tissue storage.

Methods

MEDLINE (PubMed) was searched and abstracts were screened using defined criteria to identify articles containing original data on HES tissue accumulation.

Results

Forty-eight studies were included: 37 human studies with a total of 635 patients and 11 animal studies. The most frequent indication for fluid infusion was surgery accounting for 282 patients (45.9 %). HES localization in skin was shown by 17 studies, in kidney by 12, in liver by 8, and in bone marrow by 5. Additional sites of HES deposition were lymph nodes, spleen, lung, pancreas, intestine, muscle, trophoblast, and placental stroma. Among major organs the highest measured tissue concentration of HES was in the kidney. HES uptake into intracellular vacuoles was observed by 30 min after infusion. Storage was cumulative, increasing in proportion to dose, although in 15 % of patients storage and associated symptoms were demonstrated at the lowest cumulative doses (0.4 g kg−1). Some HES deposits were extremely long-lasting, persisting for 8 years or more in skin and 10 years in kidney. Pruritus associated with HES storage was described in 17 studies and renal dysfunction in ten studies. In one included randomized trial, HES infusion produced osmotic nephrosis-like lesions indicative of HES storage (p = 0.01) and also increased the need for renal replacement therapy (odds ratio, 9.50; 95 % confidence interval, 1.09–82.7; p = 0.02). The tissue distribution of HES was generally similar in animals and humans.

Conclusions

Tissue storage of HES is widespread, rapid, cumulative, frequently long-lasting, and potentially harmful.

Keywords

Hydroxyethyl starch Hetastarch Storage Accumulation Uptake Deposit 

Supplementary material

134_2013_3156_MOESM1_ESM.doc (52 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 52 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bellmann R, Feistritzer C, Wiedermann CJ (2012) Effect of molecular weight and substitution on tissue uptake of hydroxyethyl starch: a meta-analysis of clinical studies. Clin Pharmacokinet 51:225–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thompson WL, Fukushima T, Rutherford RB, Walton RP (1970) Intravascular persistence, tissue storage, and excretion of hydroxyethyl starch. Surg Gynecol Obstet 131:965–972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindblad G, Falk J (1976) Konzentrationsverlauf von Hydroxyäthylstärke und Dextran in Serum und Lebergewebe von Kaninchen und die histopathologischen Folgen der Speicherung von Hydroxyäthylstärke. Infusionstherapie 3:301–303Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jesch F, Hübner G, Zumtobel V, Zimmermann M, Messmer K (1979) Hydroxyäthylstärke (HÄS 450/0,7) in Plasma und Leber: Konzentrationsverlauf und histologische Veränderungen beim Menschen. Infusionsther Klin Ernahr 6:112–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pfeifer U, Kult J, Förster H (1984) Ascites als Komplikation hepatischer Speicherung von Hydroxyethylstärke (HES) bei Langzeitdialyse. Klin Wochenschr 62:862–866PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dienes HP, Gerharz CD, Wagner R, Weber M, John HD (1986) Accumulation of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in the liver of patients with renal failure and portal hypertension. J Hepatol 3:223–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sirtl C, Hübner G, Jesch F (1988) Zur Speicherung von hoch-und mittelmolekularer Hydroxyäthylstärke (HÄS) im menshlichen Gewebe. Beitr Anaesth Intensivmed 26:74–97Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sadek S, Owunwanne A, Abdel-Dayem HM, Yacoub T (1989) Preparation and evaluation of Tc-99m hydroxyethyl starch as a potential radiopharmaceutical for lymphoscintigraphy: comparison with Tc-99m human serum albumin, Tc-99m dextran, and Tc-99m sulfur microcolloid. Lymphology 22:157–166PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burgstaler EA, Pineda AA (1990) Hydroxyethylstarch as replacement in therapeutic plasma exchange. Prog Clin Biol Res 337:395–397PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heilmann L, Lorch E, Hojnacki B, Müntefering H, Förster H (1991) Die Speicherung von zwei unterschiedlichen Hydroxyäthylstärke-Präparaten in der Plazenta nach Hämodilution bei Patientinnen mit fetaler Mangelentwicklung oder Schwangerschaftshochdruck. Infusionstherapie 18:236–243PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parth E, Jurecka W, Szépfalusi Z, Schimetta W, Gebhart W, Scheiner O, Kraft D (1992) Histological and immunohistochemical investigations of hydroxyethyl-starch deposits in rat tissues. Eur Surg Res 24:13–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gall H, Kaufmann R, von Ehr M, Schumann K, Sterry W (1993) Persistierender Pruritus nach Hydroxyäthylstärke-Infusionen: retrospektive Langzeitstudie an 266 Fällen. Hautarzt 44:713–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hosgood G, Lewis DD, Hodgin EC, Church DF, Lopez MK (1993) Effect of deferoxamine-hydroxyethyl pentafraction starch on free, autogenous full-thickness skin grafts in dogs. Am J Vet Res 54:341–348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jurecka W, Szépfalusi Z, Parth E, Schimetta W, Gebhart W, Scheiner O, Kraft D (1993) Hydroxyethylstarch deposits in human skin—a model for pruritus? Arch Dermatol Res 285:13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Legendre C, Thervet E, Page B, Percheron A, Noël LH, Kreis H (1993) Hydroxyethylstarch and osmotic-nephrosis-like lesions in kidney transplantation. Lancet 342:248–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szeimies R-M, Stolz W, Wlotzke U, Korting HC, Landthaler M (1994) Successful treatment of hydroxyethyl starch-induced pruritus with topical capsaicin. Br J Dermatol 131:380–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Leunig A, Szeimies R-M, Wilmes E, Gutmann R, Stolz W, Feyh J (1995) Klinische und elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchung zur Hörsturztherapie mit der Kombination 10% HES 200/0,5 und Pentoxifyllin. Laryngorhinootologie 74:135–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cittanova ML, Leblanc I, Legendre C, Mouquet C, Riou B, Coriat P (1996) Effect of hydroxyethylstarch in brain-dead kidney donors on renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Lancet 348:1620–1622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Coronel B, Mercatello A, Simone C, Xavier M, Moskovtchenko JF (1996) Hydroxyethylstarch and osmotic nephrosis-like lesions in kidney transplants. Lancet 348:1595Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cox NH, Popple AW (1996) Persistent erythema and pruritus, with a confluent histiocytic skin infiltrate, following the use of a hydroxyethylstarch plasma expander. Br J Dermatol 134:353–357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gall H, Schultz KD, Boehncke WH, Kaufmann R (1996) Clinical and pathophysiological aspects of hydroxyethyl starch-induced pruritus: evaluation of 96 cases. Dermatology 192:222–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Standl T, Lipfert B, Reeker W, Schulte am Esch J, Lorke DE (1996) Akute Auswirkungen eines kompletten Blutaustauschs mit ultragereinigter Hämoglobinlösung oder Hydroxyäthylstärke auf Leber und Niere im Tiermodell. Anästhesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther 31:354–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Speight EL, MacSween RM, Stevens A (1997) Persistent itching due to etherified starch plasma expander. BMJ 314:1466–1467PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kiehl P, Metze D, Kresse H, Reimann S, Kraft D, Kapp A (1998) Decreased activity of acid α-glucosidase in a patient with persistent periocular swelling after infusions of hydroxyethyl starch. Br J Dermatol 138:672–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lukasewitz P, Kroh U, Löwenstein O, Krämer M, Lennartz H (1998) Quantitative Untersuchungen zur Gewebsspeicherung von mittelmolekularer Hydroxyethylstärke 200/0,5 bei Patienten mit Multiorganversagen. J Anaesth Intensivbeh 3:42–46Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sirtl C, Laubenthal H, Zumtobel V, Kraft D, Jurecka W (1999) Tissue deposits of hydroxyethyl starch (HES): dose-dependent and time-related. Br J Anaesth 82:510–515PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Christidis C, Mal F, Ramos J, Senejoux A, Callard P, Navarro R, Trinchet JC, Larrey D, Beaugrand M, Guettier C (2001) Worsening of hepatic dysfunction as a consequence of repeated hydroxyethylstarch infusions. J Hepatol 35:726–732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    de Labarthe A, Jacobs F, Blot F, Glotz D (2001) Acute renal failure secondary to hydroxyethylstarch administration in a surgical patient. Am J Med 111:417–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ständer S, Szépfalusi Z, Bohle B, Ständer H, Kraft D, Luger TA, Metze D (2001) Differential storage of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) in the skin: an immunoelectron-microscopical long-term study. Cell Tissue Res 304:261–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ständer S, Bone HG, Machens HG, Aberle T, Burchard W, Prien T, Luger TA, Metze D (2002) Hydroxyethyl starch does not cross the blood-brain or the placental barrier but the perineurium of peripheral nerves in infused animals. Cell Tissue Res 310:279–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leuschner J, Opitz J, Winkler A, Scharpf R, Bepperling F (2003) Tissue storage of 14C-labelled hydroxyethyl starch (HES) 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5 after repeated intravenous administration to rats. Drugs R D 4:331–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weisshaar E, Ständer S, Metze D, Diepgen TL (2004) Hydroxyethylstärke- (HES-)induzierter Pruritus als sekundäre Folge eines Arbeitsunfalls. Hautarzt 55:558–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pillebout E, Nochy D, Hill G, Conti F, Antoine C, Calmus Y, Glotz D (2005) Renal histopathological lesions after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Am J Transplant 5:1120–1129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ständer S, Evers S, Metze D, Schmelz M (2005) Neurophysiological evidence for altered sensory function caused by storage of hydroxyethyl starch in cutaneous nerve fibres. Br J Dermatol 152:1085–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Auwerda JJ, Leebeek FW, Wilson JH, van Diggelen OP, Lam KH, Sonneveld P (2006) Acquired lysosomal storage caused by frequent plasmapheresis procedures with hydroxyethyl starch. Transfusion 46:1705–1711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ebcioglu Z, Cohen DJ, Crew RJ, Hardy MA, Ratner LE, D’Agati VD, Markowitz GS (2006) Osmotic nephrosis in a renal transplant recipient. Kidney Int 70:1873–1876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Schmidt-Hieber M, Loddenkemper C, Schwartz S, Arntz G, Thiel E, Notter M (2006) Hydrops lysosomalis generalisatus—an underestimated side effect of hydroxyethyl starch therapy? Eur J Haematol 77:83–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Eisenbach C, Schönfeld AH, Vogt N, Wente MN, Encke J, Stremmel W, Martin E, Pfenninger E, Weigand MA (2007) Pharmacodynamics and organ storage of hydroxyethyl starch in acute hemodilution in pigs: influence of molecular weight and degree of substitution. Intensive Care Med 33:1637–1644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kamann S, Flaig MJ, Korting HC (2007) Hydroxyethyl starch-induced itch: relevance of light microscopic analysis of semi-thin sections and electron microscopy. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 5:204–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chappell D, Bruchelt W, Schenk W, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, Conzen P, Kreimeier U, Rehm M (2008) Development of spontaneous subdural hematoma and bone marrow depression after hydroxyethyl starch administration. J Pediatr 153:579–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Haught JM, Jukic DM, English JC 3rd (2008) Hydroxyethyl starch-induced pruritus relieved by a combination of menthol and camphor. J Am Acad Dermatol 59:151–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Jamal R, Ghannoum M, Naud J-F, Turgeon P-P, Leblanc M (2008) Permanent renal failure induced by pentastarch. NDT Plus 5:322–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brandt S, Regueira T, Bracht H, Porta F, Djafarzadeh S, Takala J, Gorrasi J, Borotto E, Krejci V, Hiltebrand LB, Bruegger LE, Beldi G, Wilkens L, Lepper PM, Kessler U, Jakob SM (2009) Effect of fluid resuscitation on mortality and organ function in experimental sepsis models. Crit Care 13:R186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hagne C, Schwarz A, Gaspert A, Giambarba C, Keusch G (2009) HAES in der Sepsis: ein Damoklesschwert? Schweiz Med Forum 9:304–306Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hüter L, Simon TP, Weinmann L, Schuerholz T, Reinhart K, Wolf G, Amann KU, Marx G (2009) Hydroxyethylstarch impairs renal function and induces interstitial proliferation, macrophage infiltration and tubular damage in an isolated renal perfusion model. Crit Care 13:R23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhao HJ, Chen HP, Meng ZY, Wang Q (2009) A case of acute renal failure due to hydroxyethyl starch. Clin Nephrol 71:329–332PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Aneja S, Sood A, Taylor JS, McMahon JT, Billings SD, Bergfeld WF (2012) Generalized pruritus sine materia precipitated by exposure to hydroxyethyl starch. J Am Acad Dermatol 66:AB53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kumar AB, Suneja M (2012) Hetastarch-induced osmotic nephrosis. Anesthesiology 117:647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ständer S, Richter L, Osada N, Metze D (2013) Hydroxyethyl starch-induced pruritus: clinical characteristics and influence of dose, molecular weight and substitution. Acta Derm Venereol. doi:10.2340/00015555-1639 Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Metze D, Reimann S, Szépfalusi Z, Bohle B, Kraft D, Luger TA (1997) Persistent pruritus after hydroxyethyl starch infusion therapy: a result of long-term storage in cutaneous nerves. Br J Dermatol 136:553–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Reimann S, Szépfalusi Z, Kraft D, Luger T, Metze D (2000) Hydroxyethylstärke-Speicherung in der Haut unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Hydroxyethylstärke-assoziierten Juckreizes. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 125:280–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Auwerda JJ, Wilson JH, Sonneveld P (2002) Foamy macrophage syndrome due to hydroxyethyl starch replacement: a severe side effect in plasmapheresis. Ann Intern Med 137:1013–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bork K (2005) Pruritus precipitated by hydroxyethyl starch: a review. Br J Dermatol 152:3–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Mutter TC, Ruth CA, Dart AB (2013) Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) versus other fluid therapies: effects on kidney function. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD007594PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Gattas DJ, Dan A, Myburgh J, Billot L, Lo S, Finfer S, CHEST Management Committee (2013) Fluid resuscitation with 6% hydroxyethyl starch (130/0.4 and 130/0.42) in acutely ill patients: systematic review of effects on mortality and treatment with renal replacement therapy. Intensive Care Med 39:558–568PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Dickenmann M, Oettl T, Mihatsch MJ (2008) Osmotic nephrosis: acute kidney injury with accumulation of proximal tubular lysosomes due to administration of exogenous solutes. Am J Kidney Dis 51:491–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ferber HP, Nitsch E, Förster H (1985) Studies on hydroxyethyl starch. Part II: changes of the molecular weight distribution for hydroxyethyl starch types 450/0.7, 450/0.5, 450/0.3, 300/0.4, 200/0.7, 200/0.5, 200/0.3 and 200/0.1 after infusion in serum and urine of volunteers. Arzneimittelforschung 35:615–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Myburgh JA, Finfer S, Bellomo R, Billot L, Cass A, Gattas D, Glass P, Lipman J, Liu B, McArthur C, McGuinness S, Rajbhandari D, Taylor CB, Webb SA (2012) Hydroxyethyl starch or saline for fluid resuscitation in intensive care. N Engl J Med 367:1901–1911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ESICM 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Internal MedicineCentral Hospital of BolzanoBolzanoItaly
  2. 2.Division of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineMedical University of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria

Personalised recommendations