Partial liberalization of visiting policies and ICU staff: a before-and-after study
To investigate possible psychological distress among staff after partial liberalization of visiting policies in intensive care units (ICUs).
We surveyed eight Italian ICUs planning to increase daily visiting to at least 8 h. Participants completed the Maslach–Jackson Burnout Inventory and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory before policy change (T0), after 6 months (T1) and 12 months (T2). At T0 and T2, their opinions on the new policy were solicited. Analyses were adjusted for main known confounders (age, gender, centre, educational and marital status, experience in ICU, baseline level of burnout or anxiety, and mortality rate).
Baseline response rate was 89 % (230/258); 198 subjects (77 %) responded at T0 and T2, whereas 184 (71 %) participated in all three phases. High burnout levels were identified in 34.5 % of participants at T0 and 42.6 % at T2 (adjusted p = 0.001). All three phases showed a predominance of high burnout among nurses (adjusted p = 0.002). State and trait anxiety scores remained stable (adjusted p = 0.100 and 0.288, respectively). Most participants viewed the change positively at T0 (doctors 81.7 %; nurses 67.7 %) and T2 (doctors 87.0 %; nurses 62.7 %). At T2, 129 participants made comments (180 positive, 136 negative). Subjects with high burnout were more likely to comment negatively (p = 0.011).
Partial liberalization of ICU visiting policies was associated over the course of a year with a small but significant increase in staff members’ burnout levels. Nonetheless, doctors and nurses viewed the policy positively, maintaining this opinion after 1 year. Negative views were strongly correlated with burnout.
KeywordsIntensive care Visiting policies Burnout Anxiety Stress Family
We thank all doctors and nurses of surveyed ICUs for their cooperation in this study. This study was supported by ABN (Associazione per il Bambino Nefropatico, Milan, Italy) and by Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda—Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (Milan, Italy)
- 3.Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, Tieszen M, Kon AA, Shepard E, Spuhler V, Todres ID, Levy M, Barr J, Ghandi R, Hirsch G, Armstrong D, American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005, Society of Critical Care Medicine (2007) Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005. Crit Care Med 35:605–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.American Association of Critical Care Nurses (2011) Family presence: visitation in the adult ICU. http://www.aacn.org/WD/practice/docs/practicealerts/family-visitation-adult-icu-practicealert.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2012
- 10.Soury-Lavergne A, Hauchard I, Dray S, Baillot ML, Bertholet E, Clabault K, Jeune S, Ledroit C, Lelias I, Lombardo V, Maetens Y, Meziani F, Reignier J, Souweine B, Tabah A, Barrau K, Roch A, Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF) (2012) Survey of caregiver opinions on the practicalities of family-centred care in intensive care units. J Clin Nurs 21:1060–1067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Vandijck DM, Labeau SO, Geerinckx CE, De Puydt E, Bolders AC, Claes B, Blot SI, Executive Board of the Flemish Society for Critical Care Nurses, Ghent and Edegem, Belgium (2010) An evaluation of family-centered care services and organization of visiting policies in Belgian intensive care units: a multicenter survey. Heart Lung 39:137–146PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Fumagalli S, Boncinelli L, Lo Nostro A, Valoti P, Baldereschi G, Di Bari M, Ungar A, Baldasseroni S, Geppetti P, Masotti G, Pini R, Marchionni N (2006) Reduced cardiocirculatory complications with unrestrictive visiting policy in an intensive care unit: results from a pilot, randomized trial. Circulation 113:946–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Maslach C, Jackson S, Leiter MP (1996) Maslach Burnout Inventory manual. Consulting Psychologists, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
- 22.Sirigatti S, Stefanile C (1993) Adattamento italiano MBI—Maslach Burnout Inventory. Organizzazioni Speciali, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
- 26.Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
- 27.Spielberger CD (1989) STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory). Inventario per l’ansia di stato e di tratto. Forma Y. Organizzazioni Speciali, FirenzeGoogle Scholar
- 32.Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL, Soares M, Rusinová K, Lafabrie A, Abizanda R, Svantesson M, Rubulotta F, Ricou B, Benoit D, Heyland D, Joynt G, Français A, Azeivedo-Maia P, Owczuk R, Benbenishty J, de Vita M, Valentin A, Ksomos A, Cohen S, Kompan L, Ho K, Abroug F, Kaarlola A, Gerlach H, Kyprianou T, Michalsen A, Chevret S, Schlemmer B, Conflicus Study Investigators and for the Ethics Section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (2009) Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:853–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Piers RD, Azoulay E, Ricou B, Dekeyser Ganz F, Decruyenaere J, Max A, Michalsen A, Maia PA, Owczuk R, Rubulotta F, Depuydt P, Meert AP, Reyners AK, Aquilina A, Bekaert M, Van den Noortgate NJ, Schrauwen WJ, Benoit DD, APPROPRICUS Study Group of the Ethics Section of the ESICM (2011) Perceptions of appropriateness of care among European and Israeli intensive care unit nurses and physicians. JAMA 306:2694–2703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Lavoie-Tremblay M, Bonin JP, Lesage AD, Bonneville-Roussy A, Lavigne GL, Laroche D (2010) Contribution of the psychosocial work environment to psychological distress among health care professionals before and during a major organizational change. Health Care Manag (Frederick) 29:293–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar