Effect of sedation level on the prevalence of delirium when assessed with CAM-ICU and ICDSC
We hypothesized that reduced arousability (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, RASS, scores −2 to −3) for any reason during delirium assessment increases the apparent prevalence of delirium in intensive care patients. To test this hypothesis, we assessed delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) and Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) in intensive care patients during sedation stops, and related the findings to the level of sedation, as assessed with RASS score.
We assessed delirium in 80 patients with ICU stay longer than 48 h using CAM-ICU and ICDSC during daily sedation stops. Sedation was assessed using RASS. The effect of including patients with a RASS of −2 and −3 during sedation stop (“light to moderate sedation”, eye contact less than 10 s or not at all, respectively) on prevalence of delirium was analyzed.
A total of 467 patient days were assessed. The proportion of CAM-ICU-positive evaluations decreased from 53 to 31 % (p < 0.001) if assessments from patients at RASS −2/−3 (22 % of all assessments) were excluded. Similarly, the number of positive ICDSC results decreased from 51 to 29 % (p < 0.001).
Sedation per se can result in positive items of both CAM-ICU and ICDSC, and therefore in a diagnosis of delirium. Consequently, apparent prevalence of delirium is dependent on how a depressed level of consciousness after sedation stop is interpreted (delirium vs persisting sedation). We suggest that any reports on delirium using these assessment tools should be stratified for a sedation score during the assessment.
KeywordsCAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit) ICDSC (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist) Intensive care medicine Delirium Sedation
- 6.Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, Speroff T, Gautam S, Bernard GR, Inouye SK (2001) Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med 29:1370–1379 (pii 11445689)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, Hart RP, Dittus R (2001) Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA 286:2703–2710 (pii 11730446)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.van Eijk MM, van den Boogaard M, van Marum RJ, Benner P, Eikelenboom P, Honing ML, van der Hoven B, Horn J, Izaks GJ, Kalf A, Karakus A, Klijn IA, Kuiper MA, de Leeuw FE, de Man T, van der Mast RC, Osse RJ, de Rooij SE, Spronk PE, van der Voort PH, van Gool WA, Slooter AJ (2011) Routine use of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit: a multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 184:340–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Pandharipande P, Cotton BA, Shintani A, Thompson J, Costabile S, Truman Pun B, Dittus R, Ely EW (2007) Motoric subtypes of delirium in mechanically ventilated surgical and trauma intensive care unit patients. Intensive Care Med 33:1726–1731. doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0687-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Pun BT, Gordon SM, Peterson JF, Shintani AK, Jackson JC, Foss J, Harding SD, Bernard GR, Dittus RS, Ely EW (2005) Large-scale implementation of sedation and delirium monitoring in the intensive care unit: a report from two medical centers. Crit Care Med 33:1199–1205 (pii 15942331)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Soja SL, Pandharipande PP, Fleming SB, Cotton BA, Miller LR, Weaver SG, Lee BT, Ely EW (2008) Implementation, reliability testing, and compliance monitoring of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit in trauma patients. Intensive Care Med 34:1263–1268. doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1031-x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Ely EW (2010) Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) the complete training manual. http://www.mc.vanderbilt.edu/icudelirium/docs/CAM_ICU_training.pdf. Accessed 15 Mar 2013
- 18.Association AP (2013) Delirium diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders DSM-5. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, pp 596–602Google Scholar
- 19.Haenggi M, Ypparila H, Takala J, Korhonen I, Luginbuhl M, Petersen-Felix S, Jakob SM (2004) Measuring depth of sedation with auditory evoked potentials during controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesth Analg 99:1728–1736. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000135634.46493.0A (table of contents)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Haenggi M, Ypparila-Wolters H, Buerki S, Schlauri R, Korhonen I, Takala J, Jakob SM (2009) Auditory event-related potentials, bispectral index, and entropy for the discrimination of different levels of sedation in intensive care unit patients. Anesth Analg 109:807–816. doi:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181acc85d PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar