Family satisfaction in the intensive care unit: a quantitative and qualitative analysis
- 3.2k Downloads
To assess family satisfaction in the intensive care unit (ICU) and areas for improvement using quantitative and qualitative analyses.
Prospective cohort study performed in four (mixed surgical, neurological, and cardiological) intensive care units of a university hospital in Germany, using a translated and validated version of the Family Satisfaction in the ICU (FS-ICU) questionnaire, with questions answerable on a rating scale and three open-ended questions about strengths and weaknesses. Quantitative analysis was performed to identify items with low performance and high importance. For qualitative analysis, comments were coded and analyzed to identify important themes. Patient-related data were obtained from an electronic patient data management system.
Participants were 215 family members visiting adult intensive care patients with length of stay over 48 h. Response rate was 28 %. Respondents were highly satisfied; summary scores were 78.3 ± 14.3 [mean ± standard deviation (SD)] on a scale of 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent). Regression analysis failed to identify association with patient- or family-related factors. The following themes for possible improvement emerged from both quantitative and qualitative analyses: patient agitation—consistency, clarity and completeness of information—emotional support—respect and compassion towards families. Families were also dissatisfied with the waiting room, ICU atmosphere, and amenities for visiting relatives.
Families report high satisfaction with intensive care. Nevertheless, there is room for improvement, in particular regarding how ICU staff communicate with families and provide emotional support.
KeywordsFamily satisfaction Quality Communication Critical care Qualitative study
The CSCC is supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany, FKZ: 01EO1002.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
- 1.Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 13.Huang R (2011) RQDA: R-based qualitative data analysis. R package version 0.2-1. http://rqda.r-forge.r-project.org/
- 18.Peigne V, Chaize M, Falissard B, Kentish-Barnes N, Rusinova K, Megarbane B, Bele N, Cariou A, Fieux F, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Georges H, Jourdain M, Kouatchet A, Lautrette A, Legriel S, Regnier B, Renault A, Thirion M, Timsit JF, Toledano D, Chevret S, Pochard F, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E (2011) Important questions asked by family members of intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 39:1365–1371PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.de Miranda S, Pochard F, Chaize M, Megarbane B, Cuvelier A, Bele N, Gonzalez-Bermejo J, Aboab J, Lautrette A, Lemiale V, Roche N, Thirion M, Chevret S, Schlemmer B, Similowski T, Azoulay E (2011) Postintensive care unit psychological burden in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and informal caregivers: a multicenter study. Crit Care Med 39:112–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Hubert P, Canoui P, Grassin M, Zittoun R, le Gall JR, Dhainaut JF, Schlemmer B (2001) Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med 29:1893–1897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Pochard F, Darmon M, Fassier T, Bollaert PE, Cheval C, Coloigner M, Merouani A, Moulront S, Pigne E, Pingat J, Zahar JR, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E (2005) Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients before discharge or death. A prospective multicenter study. J Crit Care 20:90–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Davidson JE, Powers K, Hedayat KM, Tieszen M, Kon AA, Shepard E, Spuhler V, Todres ID, Levy M, Barr J, Ghandi R, Hirsch G, Armstrong D (2007) Clinical practice guidelines for support of the family in the patient-centered intensive care unit: American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force 2004–2005. Crit Care Med 35:605–622PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Lautrette A, Darmon M, Megarbane B, Joly LM, Chevret S, Adrie C, Barnoud D, Bleichner G, Bruel C, Choukroun G, Curtis JR, Fieux F, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Georges H, Goldgran-Toledano D, Jourdain M, Loubert G, Reignier J, Saidi F, Souweine B, Vincent F, Barnes NK, Pochard F, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E (2007) A communication strategy and brochure for relatives of patients dying in the ICU. N Engl J Med 356:469–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Sprung CL, Carmel S, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Cohen SL, Maia P, Beishuizen A, Nalos D, Novak I, Svantesson M, Benbenishty J, Henderson B (2007) Attitudes of European physicians, nurses, patients, and families regarding end-of-life decisions: the ETHICATT study. Intensive Care Med 33:104–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Konkani A, Oakley B (2011) Noise in hospital intensive care units-a critical review of a critical topic. J Crit Care 27:522, e521–e529Google Scholar