Evaluation of fully automated ventilation: a randomized controlled study in post-cardiac surgery patients
- 776 Downloads
Discrepancies between the demand and availability of clinicians to care for mechanically ventilated patients can be anticipated due to an aging population and to increasing severity of illness. The use of closed-loop ventilation provides a potential solution. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety of a fully automated ventilator.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing automated ventilation (AV) and protocolized ventilation (PV) in 60 ICU patients after cardiac surgery. In the PV group, tidal volume, respiratory rate, FiO2 and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) were set according to the local hospital protocol based on currently available guidelines. In the AV group, only sex, patient height and a maximum PEEP level of 10 cmH2O were set. The primary endpoint was the duration of ventilation within a “not acceptable” range of tidal volume. Zones of optimal, acceptable and not acceptable ventilation were based on several respiratory parameters and defined a priori.
The patients were assigned equally to each group, 30 to PV and 30 to AV. The percentage of time within the predefined zones of optimal, acceptable and not acceptable ventilation were 12 %, 81 %, and 7 % respectively with PV, and 89.5 %, 10 % and 0.5 % with AV (P < 0.001). There were 148 interventions required during PV compared to only 5 interventions with AV (P < 0.001).
Fully AV was safe in hemodynamically stable patients immediately following cardiac surgery. In addition to a reduction in the number of interventions, the AV system maintained patients within a predefined target range of optimal ventilation.
KeywordsPositive-pressure respiration Randomized trial Closed-loop Thoracic surgery Cardiac surgery Mechanical ventilation
Dr. Lellouche holds a clinical research scholarship from FRSQ (Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec). Hamilton Medical provided a restricted grant of 60,000 Can$ to conduct the study and provided ventilators for the study. The funding agencies had no role in the conduct of the study, in the collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, or in the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript. Marc Wysocki participated to the study design, but data were analyzed independently from Hamilton Medical at IUCPQ Research Center (Serge Simard, biostatistician), and manuscript draft was prepared mainly by François Lellouche.
Conflicts of interest
Dr. Wysocki was head of medical research at Hamilton Medical Company when the study was performed; he is now Medical Director of GE Healthcare.
- 1.Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, White A, Popovich J Jr (2000) Caring for the critically ill patient. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA 284:2762–2770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Lellouche F, Bojmehrani A, Burns K (2012) Mechanical ventilation with advanced closed-loop systems: automating knowledge transfer and reducing the supply demand. Eur Respir Mon 55:217–228Google Scholar
- 12.Lellouche F, Bouchard PA, Wysocki M, Laubscher T, Novotni D, Lopez R, Bruehschwein F, Durish G, L’Her E (2010) Prospective randomized controlled study comparing conventional ventilation versus a fully closed-loop ventilation (Intellivent) in post cardiac surgery ICU patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 181:A6035Google Scholar
- 13.Arnal JM, Wysocki M, Novotni D, Demory D, Lopez R, Donati S, Granier I, Corno G, Durand-Gasselin J (2012) Safety and efficacy of a fully closed-loop control ventilation (IntelliVent-ASV(R)) in sedated ICU patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective randomized crossover study. Intensive Care Med 38:781–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Shapiro BA, Peruzzi WT (2000) Respiratory care. In: Miller RD (ed) Anesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 2403–2443Google Scholar
- 15.Wilson WC, Benumof JL (2005) Anesthesia for thoracic surgery. In: Miller RD (ed) Miller’s anesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 1847–1939Google Scholar
- 16.Cheng DC, Karski J, Peniston C, Asokumar B, Raveendran G, Carroll J, Nierenberg H, Roger S, Mickle D, Tong J, Zelovitsky J, David T, Sandler A (1996) Morbidity outcome in early versus conventional tracheal extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 112:755–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wysocki M, Arnal JM, Feissel M, L’Her E, Roesler J, Bialais E, Lellouche F (2010) What ventilation and blood gases are “desirable” in adult mechanically ventilated patients. Intensive Care Med 35:S106Google Scholar
- 24.Mireles-Cabodevila E, Hatipoglu U, Chatburn RL (2013) A rational framework for selecting modes of ventilation. Respir Care 58(2):348–366Google Scholar
- 25.Lellouche F, Mancebo J, Jolliet P, Roeseler J, Schortgen F, Dojat M, Cabello B, Bouadma L, Rodriguez P, Maggiore S, Reynaert M, Mersmann S, Brochard L (2006) A multicenter randomized trial of computer-driven protocolized weaning from mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 174:894–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Burns KEA, Lellouche F, Lessard M, Hand L, Zhou Q, Keenan SP, Meade M (2011) Wean earlier and automatically with new technology: preliminary results of the wean study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 183:A6248Google Scholar
- 28.Schädler D, Elke G, Pulletz S, Haake N, Frerichs I, Scholz J, Zick G, Weiler N (2009) The effect of automatic weaning with SmartCare/PS on ventilation time in postsurgical patients – a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 179:A3646Google Scholar
- 34.Zupancich E, Paparella D, Turani F, Munch C, Rossi A, Massaccesi S, Ranieri VM (2005) Mechanical ventilation affects inflammatory mediators in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130:378–383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Esteban A, Ferguson ND, Meade MO, Frutos-Vivar F, Apezteguia C, Brochard L, Raymondos K, Nin N, Hurtado J, Tomicic V, Gonzalez M, Elizalde J, Nightingale P, Abroug F, Pelosi P, Arabi Y, Moreno R, Jibaja M, D’Empaire G, Sandi F, Matamis D, Montanez AM, Anzueto A (2008) Evolution of mechanical ventilation in response to clinical research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:170–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar