Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 160–167 | Cite as

Bench studies evaluating devices for non-invasive ventilation: critical analysis and future perspectives

  • Carlo Olivieri
  • Roberta Costa
  • Giorgio Conti
  • Paolo Navalesi
Physiological and Technical Notes



Because non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is increasingly used, new devices, both ventilators and interfaces, have been continuously proposed for clinical use in recent years. To provide the clinicians with valuable information about ventilators and interfaces for NIV, several bench studies evaluating and comparing the performance of NIV devices have been concomitantly published, which may influence the choice in equipment acquisition. As these comparisons, however, may be problematic and sometimes lacking in consistency, in the present article we review and discuss those technical aspects that may explain discrepancies.


Studies concerning bench evaluations of devices for NIV were reviewed, focusing on some specific technical aspects: lung models and simulation of inspiratory demand and effort, mechanical properties of the virtual respiratory system, generation and quantification of air leaks, ventilator modes and settings, assessment of the interface-ventilator unit performance.


The impact of the use of different test lung models is not clear and warrants elucidation; standard references for simulated demand and effort, mode of generation and extent of air leaks, resistance and compliance of the virtual respiratory system, and ventilator settings are lacking; the criteria for assessment of inspiratory trigger function, inspiration-to-expiration (I:E) cycling, and pressurization rate vary among studies; finally, the terminology utilized is inconsistent, which may also lead to confusion.


Consistent experimental settings, uniform terminology, and standard measurement criteria are deemed to be useful to enhance bench assessment of characteristics and comparison of performance of ventilators and interfaces for NIV.


Non-invasive ventilation Lung model Patient–ventilator interaction Trigger function Ventilator performance 


  1. 1.
    Gonzalez-Bermejo J, Laplanche V, Husseini FE, Duguet A, Derenne JP, Similowski T (2006) Evaluation of the user-friendliness of 11 home mechanical ventilators. Eur Respir J 27:1236–1243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lofaso F, Brochard L, Hang T, Lorino H, Harf A, Isabey D (1996) Home versus intensive care pressure support devices: experimental and clinical comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:1591–1599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aslanian P, El Atrous S, Isabey D, Valente E, Corsi D, Harf A, Lemaire F, Brochard L (1998) Effects of flow triggering on breathing effort during partial ventilatory support. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:135–143PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lofaso F, Aslanian P, Richard JC, Isabey D, Hang T, Corriger E, Harf A, Brochard L (1998) Expiratory valves used for home devices: experimental and clinical comparison. Eur Respir J 11:1382–1388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams AB, Bliss PL, Hotchkiss J (2000) Effects of respiratory impedance on the performance of bi-level pressure ventilators. Respir Care 45:390–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mehta S, McCool FD, Hill NS (2001) Leak compensation in positive pressure ventilators: a lung model study. Eur Respir J 17:259–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zanetta G, Robert D, Guérin C (2002) Evaluation of ventilators used during transport of ICU patients—a bench study. Intensive Care Med 28:443–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Richard JC, Carlucci A, Breton L, Langlais N, Jaber S, Maggiore S, Fougère S, Harf A, Brochard L (2002) Bench testing of pressure support ventilation with three different generations of ventilators. Intensive Care Med 28:1049–1057PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tassaux D, Strasser S, Fonseca S, Dalmas E, Jolliet P (2002) Comparative bench study of triggering, pressurization, and cycling between the home ventilator VPAP II and three ICU ventilators. Intensive Care Med 28:1254–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Battisti A, Tassaux D, Janssens JP, Michotte JB, Jaber S, Jolliet P (2005) Performance characteristics of 10 home mechanical ventilators in pressure-support mode: a comparative bench study. Chest 127:1784–1792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moerer O, Fischer S, Hartelt M, Kuvaki B, Quintel M, Neumann P (2006) Influence of two different interfaces for non-invasive ventilation compared to invasive ventilation on the mechanical properties and performance of a respiratory system: a lung model study. Chest 129:1424–1431PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaber S, Tassaux D, Sebbane M, Pouzeratte Y, Battisti A, Capdevila X, Eledjam JJ, Jolliet P (2006) Performance characteristics of five new anesthesia ventilators and four intensive care ventilators in pressure-support mode: a comparative bench study. Anesthesiology 105:944–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vignaux L, Tassaux D, Jolliet P (2007) Performance of non-invasive ventilation modes on ICU ventilators during pressure support: a bench model study. Intensive Care Med 33:1444–1451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fauroux B, Leroux K, Desmarais G, Isabey D, Clément A, Lofaso F, Louis B (2008) Performance of ventilators for non-invasive positive-pressure ventilation in children. Eur Respir J 31:1300–1307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thille AW, Lyazidi A, Richard JC, Galia F, Brochard L (2009) A bench study of intensive-care-unit ventilators: new versus old and turbine-based versus compressed gas-based ventilators. Intensive Care Med 35:1368–1376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Louis B, Leroux K, Isabey D, Fauroux B, Lofaso F (2010) Effect of manufacturer-inserted mask leaks on ventilator performance. Eur Respir J 35:627–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Fauroux B, Leroux K, Pépin JL, Lofaso F, Louis B (2010) Are home ventilators able to guarantee a minimal tidal volume? Intensive Care Med 36:1008–1014PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chiumello D, Pelosi P, Carlesso E, Severgnini P, Aspesi M, Gamberoni C, Antonelli M, Conti G, Chiaranda M, Gattinoni L (2003) Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation delivered by helmet vs. standard face mask. Intensive Care Med 29:1671–1679PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bunburaphong T, Imanaka H, Nishimura M, Hess D, Kacmarek RM (1997) Performance characteristics of bilevel pressure ventilators: a lung model study. Chest 111:1050–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Miyoshi E, Fujino Y, Mashimo T, Nishimura M (2000) Performance of transport ventilator with patient-triggered ventilation. Chest 118:1109–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williams P, Kratohvil J, Ritz R, Hess DR, Kacmarek RM (2000) Pressure support and pressure assist/control: are there differences? An evaluation of the newest intensive care unit ventilators. Respir Care 45:1169–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chatmongkolchart S, Williams P, Hess DR, Kacmarek RM (2001) Evaluation of inspiratory rise time and inspiration termination criteria in new-generation mechanical ventilators: a lung model study. Respir Care 46:666–677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Murata S, Yokoyama K, Sakamoto Y, Yamashita K, Oto J, Imanaka H, Nishimura M (2010) Effects of inspiratory rise time on triggering work load during pressure-support ventilation: a lung model study. Respir Care 55:878–884PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Smith IE, Shneerson JM (1996) A laboratory comparison of four positive pressure ventilators used in the home. Eur Respir J 9:2410–2415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Highcock MP, Shneerson JM, Smith IE (2001) Functional differences in bi-level pressure preset ventilators. Eur Respir J 17:268–273PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miyoshi E, Fujino Y, Uchiyama A, Mashimo T, Nishimura M (2005) Effects of gas leak on triggering function, humidification, and inspiratory oxygen fraction during non-invasive positive airway pressure ventilation. Chest 128:3691–3698PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stell IM, Paul G, Lee KC, Ponte J, Moxham J (2001) Non-invasive ventilator triggering in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A test lung comparison. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:2092–2097PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Costa R, Navalesi P, Spinazzola G, Rossi M, Cavaliere F, Antonelli M, Proietti R, Conti G (2008) Comparative evaluation of different helmets on patient-ventilator interaction during non-invasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 34:1102–1108PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ferreira JC, Chipman DW, Kacmarek RM (2008) Trigger performance of mid-level ICU mechanical ventilators during assisted ventilation: a bench study. Intensive Care Med 34:1669–1675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Borel JC, Sabil A, Janssens JP, Couteau M, Boulon L, Lévy P, Pépin JL (2009) Intentional leaks in industrial masks have a significant impact on efficacy of bilevel non-invasive ventilation: a bench test study. Chest 135:669–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ferreira JC, Chipman DW, Hill NS, Kacmarek RM (2009) Bilevel vs ICU ventilators providing non-invasive ventilation: effect of system leaks: a COPD lung model comparison. Chest 136:448–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Costa R, Navalesi P, Spinazzola G, Ferrone G, Pellegrini A, Cavaliere F, Proietti R, Antonelli M, Conti G (2010) Influence of ventilator settings on patient-ventilator synchrony during pressure support ventilation with different interfaces. Intensive Care Med 36:1363–1370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lofaso F, Fodil R, Lorino H, Leroux K, Quintel A, Leroy A, Harf A (2000) Inaccuracy of tidal volume delivered by home mechanical ventilators. Eur Respir J 15:338–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Oscroft NS, Smith IE (2010) A bench test to confirm the core features of volume-assured non-invasive ventilation. Respirology 15:361–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lyazidi A, Thille AW, Carteaux G, Galia F, Brochard L, Richard JC (2010) Bench test evaluation of volume delivered by modern ICU ventilators during volume-controlled ventilation. Intensive Care Med 36:2074–2080PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schettino GP, Tucci MR, Sousa R, Valente Barbas CS, Passos Amato MB, Carvalho CR (2001) Mask mechanics and leak dynamics during non-invasive pressure support ventilation: a bench study. Intensive Care Med 27:1887–1891PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bonmarchand G, Chevron V, Chopin C, Jusserand D, Girault C, Moritz F, Leroy J, Pasquis P (1996) Increased initial flow rate reduces inspiratory work of breathing during pressure support ventilation in patients with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intensive Care Med 22:1147–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Bonmarchand G, Chevron V, Ménard JF, Girault C, Moritz-Berthelot F, Pasquis P, Leroy J (1999) Effects of pressure ramp slope values on the work of breathing during pressure support ventilation in restrictive patients. Crit Care Med 27:715–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlo Olivieri
    • 1
  • Roberta Costa
    • 2
  • Giorgio Conti
    • 2
  • Paolo Navalesi
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Anesthesia and Intensive Care MedicineMaggiore della Carità University HospitalNovaraItaly
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care MedicineUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, A. Gemelli University HospitalRomeItaly
  3. 3.Department of Clinical and Experimental MedicineUniversità del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”NovaraItaly
  4. 4.Anesthesia and Intensive Care MedicineSant’Andrea HospitalVercelliItaly

Personalised recommendations