Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, 37:1780 | Cite as

Beneficial effects of humidified high flow nasal oxygen in critical care patients: a prospective pilot study

  • Benjamin Sztrymf
  • Jonathan Messika
  • Fabrice Bertrand
  • Dominique Hurel
  • Rusel Leon
  • Didier Dreyfuss
  • Jean-Damien Ricard
Original

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficiency, safety and outcome of high flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure.

Methods

Pilot prospective monocentric study. Thirty-eight patients were included. Baseline demographic and clinical data, as well as respiratory variables at baseline and various times after HFNC initiation during 48 h, were recorded. Arterial blood gases were measured before and after the use of HFNC. Noise and discomfort were monitored along with outcome and need for invasive mechanical ventilation.

Results

HFNC significantly reduced the respiratory rate, heart rate, dyspnea score, supraclavicular retraction and thoracoabdominal asynchrony, and increased pulse oxymetry. These improvements were observed as early as 15 min after the beginning of HFNC for respiratory rate and pulse oxymetry. PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 increased significantly after 1 h HFNC in comparison with baseline (141 ± 106 vs. 95 ± 40 mmHg, p = 0.009 and 169 ± 108 vs. 102 ± 23, p = 0.036; respectively). These improvements lasted throughout the study period. HFNC was used for a mean duration of 2.8 days and a maximum of 7 days. It was never interrupted for intolerance. No nosocomial pneumonia occurred during HFNC. Nine patients required secondary invasive mechanical ventilation. Absence of a significant decrease in the respiratory rate, lower oxygenation and persistence of thoracoabdominal asynchrony after HFNC initiation were early indicators of HFNC failure.

Conclusions

HFNC has a beneficial effect on clinical signs and oxygenation in ICU patients with acute respiratory failure. These favorable results constitute a prerequisite to launching a randomized controlled study to investigate whether HFNC reduces intubation in these patients.

Keywords

Oxygen inhalation therapy Heat Humidity Respiration, artificial Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank Mr Nathan Samis for his technical assistance.

Supplementary material

134_2011_2354_MOESM1_ESM.doc (226 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 226 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ricard JD, Boyer A (2009) Humidification during oxygen therapy and non-invasive ventilation: do we need some and how much? Intensive Care Med 35:963–965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    L’Her E, Deye N, Lellouche F, Taille S, Demoule A, Fraticelli A, Mancebo J, Brochard L (2005) Physiologic effects of noninvasive ventilation during acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172:1112–1118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shoemaker MT, Pierce MR, Yoder BA, DiGeronimo RJ (2007) High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: a retrospective study. J Perinatol 27:85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dani C, Pratesi S, Migliori C, Bertini G (2009) High flow nasal cannula therapy as respiratory support in the preterm infant. Pediatr Pulmonol 44:629–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Groves N, Tobin A (2007) High flow nasal oxygen generates positive airway pressure in adult volunteers. Aust Crit Care 20:126–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parke R, McGuinness S, Eccleston M (2009) Nasal high-flow therapy delivers low level positive airway pressure. Br J Anaesth 103:886–890PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shepard JW Jr, Burger CD (1990) Nasal and oral flow-volume loops in normal subjects and patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 142:1288–1293PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dewan NA, Bell CW (1994) Effect of low flow and high flow oxygen delivery on exercise tolerance and sensation of dyspnea: a study comparing the transtracheal catheter and nasal prongs. Chest 105:1061–1065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chatila W, Nugent T, Vance G, Gaughan J, Criner GJ (2004) The effects of high-flow vs low-flow oxygen on exercise in advanced obstructive airways disease. Chest 126:1108–1115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roca O, Riera J, Torres F, Masclans JR (2010) High-flow oxygen therapy in acute respiratory failure. Respir Care 55:408–413PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sztrymf B, Messika J, Mayot T, Lenglet H, Dreyfuss D, Ricard JD (2011) Impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy on intensive care unit patients with acute respiratory failure: a prospective observational study. J Crit Care (in press)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brochard L, Mancebo J, Wysocki M, Lofaso F, Conti G, Rauss A, Simonneau G, Benito S, Gasparetto A, Lemaire F, Isabey D, Harf A (1995) Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 333:817–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, Shaffer TH (2009) Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med 103:1400–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demoule A, Girou E, Richard JC, Taille S, Brochard L (2006) Increased use of noninvasive ventilation in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 32:1747–1755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brochard L, Mion G, Isabey D, Bertrand C, Messadi AA, Mancebo J, Boussignac G, Vasile N, Lemaire F, Harf A (1991) Constant-flow insufflation prevents arterial oxygen desaturation during endotracheal suctioning. Am Rev Respir Dis 144:395–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Engstrom J, Hedenstierna G, Larsson A (2010) Pharyngeal oxygen administration increases the time to serious desaturation at intubation in acute lung injury: an experimental study. Crit Care 14:R93PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hilbert G, Gruson D, Vargas F, Valentino R, Gbikpi-Benissan G, Dupon M, Reiffers J, Cardinaud JP (2001) Noninvasive ventilation in immunosuppressed patients with pulmonary infiltrates, fever, and acute respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 344:481–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azoulay E, Alberti C, Bornstain C, Leleu G, Moreau D, Recher C, Chevret S, Le Gall JR, Brochard L, Schlemmer B (2001) Improved survival in cancer patients requiring mechanical ventilatory support: impact of noninvasive mechanical ventilatory support. Crit Care Med 29:519–525PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fernandez R, Baigorri F, Artigas A (2007) Noninvasive ventilation in patients with “do-not-intubate” orders: medium-term efficacy depends critically on patient selection. Intensive Care Med 33:350–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bulow HH, Thorsager B (2009) Non-invasive ventilation in do-not-intubate patients: five-year follow-up on a two-year prospective, consecutive cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 53:1153–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Boyer A, Vargas F, Delacre M, Saint-Leger M, Clouzeau B, Hilbert G, Gruson D (2010) Prognostic impact of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen supply in an ICU patient with pulmonary fibrosis complicated by acute respiratory failure. Intensive Care Med 37:558–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Sztrymf
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jonathan Messika
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fabrice Bertrand
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dominique Hurel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Rusel Leon
    • 1
    • 2
  • Didier Dreyfuss
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jean-Damien Ricard
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de ParisHôpital Louis Mourier, Service de Réanimation Médico-ChirurgicaleColombesFrance
  2. 2.UFR de Médecine, Université Paris Diderot, Paris 7, PRES Sorbonne Paris CitéParisFrance
  3. 3.Service de réanimation MédicaleColombes CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations