Withholding or withdrawing therapy in intensive care units: an analysis of collaboration among healthcare professionals
The purpose of the study was to determine the views of intensive care nurses, intensivists, and primary physicians regarding collaboration and other aspects of withholding and withdrawing therapy in the intensive care unit (ICU).
A questionnaire survey was conducted in seven hospitals in the Region of Southern Denmark, including six regional and four university ICUs. Four hundred ninety-five nurses, 135 intensivists, and 146 primary physicians participated in the study. The primary physicians came from two regional hospitals.
The unified response rate was 84%. “Futile therapy” and “Patient’s wish” were for all participants the main reasons for considering withholding or withdrawing therapy. Of primary physicians 63% found their general experience of collaboration very or extremely satisfactory compared to 36% of intensivists and 27% of nurses. Forty-three percent of nurses, 29% of intensivists, and 2% of primary physicians found that decisions regarding withdrawal of therapy were often, very often, or always unnecessarily postponed. Intensivists with ICU as their main workplace were more satisfied with the collaboration and more rarely found that end-of-life decisions were changed or postponed compared to intensivists who did not have ICU as their main workplace.
Nurses, intensivists and primary physicians differ in their perception of collaboration and other aspects of withholding and withdrawing therapy practises at the ICU. Multi-disciplinary patient conferences, nurse involvement in the decision-making process, and guidelines for withholding and withdrawing therapy are recommended.
KeywordsWithholding treatment Withdrawing treatment Intensive care units Collaboration Decision-making End-of-life
- 4.Bertolini G, Boffelli S, Malacarne P, Peta M, Marchesi M, Barbisan C, Tomelleri S, Spada S, Satolli R, Gridelli B, Lizzola I, Mazzon D (2010) End-of-life decision-making and quality of ICU performance: an observational study in 84 Italian units. Intensive Care Med 36:1495–1504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Sprung CL, Maia P, Bulow HH, Ricou B, Armaganidis A, Baras M, Wennberg E, Reinhart K, Cohen SL, Fries DR, Nakos G, Thijs LG, Ethicus Study Group (2007) The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 33:1732–1739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Ferrand E, Lemaire F, Regnier B, Kuteifan K, Badet M, Asfar P, Jaber S, Chagnon JL, Renault A, Robert R, Pochard F, Herve C, Brun-Buisson C, Duvaldestin P, French RESSENTI Group (2003) Discrepancies between perceptions by physicians and nursing staff of intensive care unit end-of-life decisions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:1310–1315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Azoulay E, Timsit JF, Sprung CL, Soares M, Rusinová K, Lafabrie A, Abizanda R, Svantesson M, Rubulotta F, Ricou B, Benoit D, Heyland D, Joynt G, Français A, Azeivedo-Maia P, Owczuk R, Benbenishty J, de Vita M, Valentin A, Ksomos A, Cohen S, Kompan L, Ho K, Abroug F, Kaarlola A, Gerlach H, Kyprianou T, Michalsen A, Chevret S, Schlemmer B, Conflicus Study Investigators for the Ethics Section of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (2009) Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:853–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Thompson BT, Cox PN, Antonelli M, Carlet JM, Cassell J, Hill NS, Hinds CJ, Pimentel JM, Reinhart K, Thijs LG, American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Sociètède Rèanimation de Langue Française (2003) Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU: statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003: executive summary. Crit Care Med 32:1781–1784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Kirkwood BR, Sterne JAC (2003) Essential Medical Statistics, 2nd edn. Blackwell Science Ldt, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 28.Nelson JE, Angus DC, Weissfeld LA, Puntillo KA, Danis M, Deal D, Levy MM, Cook DJ, Critical Care Peer Workgroup of the Promoting Excellence in End-of-Life Care Project (2006) End-of-life care for the critically ill: a national intensive care unit survey. Crit Care Med 34:2547–2553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.DASAIM Danish Association of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (2009) Guide. Ethical considerations on withholding or withdrawing therapy [in Danish]. Available via DIALOG. http://www.regionmidtjylland.dk/files/Regionshuset/Kommunikationsafdelingen/Billeder/2010/03%20Marts/vejledning_etiske_forhold_ophoer.pdf Accessed 9 Jan 2011
- 30.Helsedirektoratet (2009) Decision-making processes for withholding life-sustaining therapy for critically ill and dying [in Norweigan]. Available via DIALOG. http://www.helsedirektoratet.no/vp/multimedia/archive/00117/Nasjonal_veileder_f_117069a.PDF Accessed 9 Jan 2011