Limiting the spread of highly resistant hospital-acquired microorganisms via critical care transfers: a simulation study
- 293 Downloads
Hospital-acquired infections with highly resistant organisms are an important problem among critically ill patients. Control of these organisms has largely focused within individual hospitals. We examine the extent to which transfers of critically ill patients could be a vector for the wide spread of highly resistant organisms, and compare the efficiency of different approaches to targeting infection control resources.
We analyzed the network of interhospital transfers of intensive care unit patients in 2005 US Medicare data and 2004–2006 Pennsylvania all-payer data. We simulated the spread of highly resistant hospital-acquired infections by randomly choosing a single hospital to develop a highly resistant organism and following the spread of infection or colonization throughout the network under varying strategies of infection control and varying levels of infectivity.
Critical care transfers could spread a highly resistant organism between any two US hospitals in a median of 3 years. Hospitals varied substantially in their importance to limiting potential spread. Targeting resources to a small subset of hospitals on the basis of their position in the transfer network was 16 times more efficient than distributing infection control resources uniformly. Within any set of targeted hospitals, the best strategy for infection control heavily concentrated resources at a few particularly important hospitals, regardless of level of infectivity.
Critical care transfers provide a plausible vector for widespread dissemination of highly resistant hospital-acquired microorganisms. Infection control efforts can be made more efficient by selectively targeting hospitals most important for transmission.
KeywordsHospital-acquired infections Patient transfers Networks Antimicrobial resistance Medicare Critical care
This work was supported in part by 1K08HL091249-01 from the NIH/NHLBI and by NSF IIS-0746646. This project was also funded, in part, under a grant from the Pennsylvania Department of Health, which specifically disclaims responsibility for any analyses, interpretations, or conclusions. The funders were not involved in study design, interpretation, or the decision to publish.
- 1.Davin-Regali A, Monnet D, Saux P, Bosi C, Charrel R, Barthelemy A, Bollet C (1996) Molecular epidemiology of enterobacter aerogenes acquisition: one-year prospective study in two intensive care units. J Clin Microbiol 34:1474–1480Google Scholar
- 3.Huang SS, Avery TR, Song Y, Elkins KR, Nguyen CC, Nutter SK, Nafday AA, Condon CJ, Chang MT, Chrest D, Boos J, Bobashev G, Wheaton W, Frank SA, Platt R, Lipsitch M, Bush RM, Eubank S, Burke DS, Lee BY (2010) Quantifying interhospital patient sharing as a mechanism for infectious disease spread. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 31:1160–1169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Svoboda T, Henry B, Shulman L, Kennedy E, Rea E, Ng W, Wallington T, Yaffe B, Gournis E, Vicencio E, Basrur S, Glazier RH (2004) Public health measures to control the spread of the severe acute respiratory syndrome during the outbreak in Toronto. N Engl J Med 350:2352–2361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Tansel O, Kuloglu F, Mutlu B, Anthony RM, Uyar A, Vahaboglu H, French GL (2003) A methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus outbreak in a new university hospital due to a strain transferred with an infected patient from another city six months previously. New Microbiologica 26:175–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2010) Cost reports: general information. Available at https://www.cms.gov/CostReports/Downloads/CRGeneralInfo.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2011
- 30.Koeman M, van der Ven AJ, Hak E, Joore HC, Kaasjager K, de Smet AG, Ramsay G, Dormans TP, Aarts LP, de Bel EE, Hustinx WN, van der Tweel I, Hoepelman AM, Bonten MJ (2006) Oral decontamination with chlorhexidine reduces the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:1348–1355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Cutler DM (2002) Health Care and the Public Sector. In: Auerbach AJ, Feldstein M (eds) Handbook of public economics. Elsevier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 39.Valente TW (1995) Network models of diffusion of innovation. Hampton, CresskillGoogle Scholar
- 41.Chen Y, Paul G, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Stanley HE (2006) Finding a better immunization strategy. Phys Rev Lett 101:05871Google Scholar
- 42.Borgatti SP (2006) Identifying key players in a social network. Comput Math Organ Theory 12:21–34Google Scholar
- 44.Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, Ponce de Leon S, Hernandez M, Quinones-Falconi F, Bautista E, Ramirez-Venegas A, Rojas-Serrano J, Ormsby CE, Corrales A, Higuera A, Mondragon E, Cordova-Villalobos JA (2009) Pneumonia and respiratory failure from swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med 361:680–689Google Scholar
- 45.Freeman LC (1978/79) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Social Netw 1:215–239Google Scholar
- 46.Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar