Intensive Care Medicine

, 37:1672 | Cite as

Effect of tidal volume, intrathoracic pressure, and cardiac contractility on variations in pulse pressure, stroke volume, and intrathoracic blood volume

  • Jaume Mesquida
  • Hyung Kook Kim
  • Michael R. Pinsky
Experimental

Abstract

Purpose

We evaluated the impact of increasing tidal volume (Vt), decreased chest wall compliance, and left ventricular (LV) contractility during intermittent positive-pressure ventilation (IPPV) on the relation between pulse pressure (PP) and LV stroke volume (SVLV) variation (PPV and SVV, respectively), and intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) changes.

Methods

Sixteen pentobarbital-anesthetized thoracotomized mongrel dogs were studied both before and after propranolol-induced acute ventricular failure (AVF) (n = 4), with and without chest and abdominal pneumatic binders to decrease chest wall compliance (n = 6), and during Vt of 5, 10, 15, and 25 ml/kg (n = 6). SVLV and right ventricular stroke volume (SVRV) were derived from electromagnetic flow probes around aortic and pulmonary artery roots. Arterial pressure was measured in the aorta using a fluid-filled catheter. Arterial PPV and SVV were calculated over three breaths as (max − min)/[(max + min)/2]. ITBV changes during ventilation were inferred from the beat-to-beat volume differences between SVRV and SVLV.

Results

Arterial PP and SVLV were tightly correlated during IPPV under all conditions (r2 = 0.85). Both PPV and SVV increased progressively as Vt increased and with thoraco-abdominal binding, and tended to decrease during AVF. SVRV phasically decreased during inspiration, whereas SVLV phasically decreased 2–3 beats later, such that ITBV decreased during inspiration and returned to apneic values during expiration. ITBV decrements increased with increasing Vt or with thoraco-abdominal binding, and decreased during AVF owing to variations in SVRV, such that both PPV and SVV tightly correlated with inspiration-associated changes in SVRV and ITBV.

Conclusion

Arterial PP and SVLV are tightly correlated during IPPV and their relation is not altered by selective changes in LV contractility, intrathoracic pressure, or Vt. However, contractility, intrathoracic pressure, and Vt directly alter the magnitude of PPV and SVV primarily by altering the inspiration-associated decreases in SVRV and ITBV.

Keywords

Hemodynamic monitoring Fluid responsiveness Canine model Heart–lung interactions Mechanical ventilation 

Supplementary material

134_2011_2304_MOESM1_ESM.doc (345 kb)
Supplementary figures (DOC 345 kb)
134_2011_2304_MOESM2_ESM.doc (40 kb)
Supplementary material (DOC 39 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Pinsky MR, Matuschak GM, Klain M (1985) Determinants of cardiac augmentation by increases in intrathoracic pressure. J Appl Physiol 58:1189–1198PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michard F, Teboul JL (2002) Predicting fluid responsiveness in ICU patients: a critical analysis of the evidence. Chest 121:2000–2008PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pinsky MR (2004) Using ventilation-induced aortic pressure and flow variation to diagnose preload responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 30:1008–1010PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reuter DA, Felbinger TW, Schmidt C, Kilger E, Goedje O, Lamm P, Goetz AE (2002) Stroke volume variation for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 28:392–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Backer D, Heenen S, Piagnerelli M, Koch M, Vincent JL (2005) Pulse pressure variations to predict fluid responsiveness: influence of tidal volume. Intensive Care Med 31:517–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denault AY, Gasior TA, Gorcsan J, Mandarino WA, Deneault LG, Pinsky MR (1999) Determinants of aortic pressure variation during positive-pressure ventilation in man. Chest 116:176–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gunn SR, Harrigan PWJB, Denault AY, Gorcsan J III, Teboul JL, Pinsky MR (2002) Does pulse pressure variation correlate with conventional measures of preload? Crit Care Shock 5:170–176Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kim HK, Pinsky MR (2008) Effect of tidal volume, sampling duration, and cardiac contractility on pulse pressure and stroke volume variation during positive-pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med 36:2858–2862PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boltwood CM, Appleyard RF, Glantz SA (1989) Left ventricular volume measurement by conductance catheter in intact dogs. Circulation 80:1360–1377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopes MR, Oliveira MA, Pereira VOS, Lemos IPB, Auler JOC Jr, Michard F (2005) Goal-directed fluid management based on pulse pressure variation monitoring during high-risk surgery: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Crit Care 11:R100–R107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinsky MR, Summer WR, Wise RA, Permutt S, Bromberger-Barnea B (1983) Augmentation of cardiac function by elevation of intrathoracic pressure. J Appl Physiol 54:950–955PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Michard F, Chemla D, Richard C, Wysocki M, Pinsky MR, Lecarpentier Y, Teboul JL (1999) Clinical use of respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure to monitor the hemodynamic effects of PEEP. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:935–939PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slama M, Masson H, Teboul JL, Arnould ML, Nait-Kaoudjt R, Colas B, Peltier M, Tribouilloy C, Susic D, Frohlich E, Andrejak M (2004) Monitoring of respiratory variations of aortic blood flow velocity using esophageal Doppler. Intensive Care Med 30:1181–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Michard F (2005) Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 103:419–428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Muller L, Louart G, Bousquet PJ, Candela D, Zoric L, de La Coussaye JE, Jaber S, Lefrant JY (2010) The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. Intensive Care Med 36:496–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Monge García MI, Gil Cano A, Gracia Romero M (2011) Dynamic arterial elastance to predict arterial pressure response to volume loading in preload-dependent patients. Crit Care 15(1):R15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pinsky MR (1984) Instantaneous venous return curves in an intact canine preparation. J Appl Physiol 56:765–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pinsky MR (1984) Determinants of pulmonary artery flow variation during respiration. J Appl Physiol 56:1237–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaume Mesquida
    • 1
    • 2
  • Hyung Kook Kim
    • 1
  • Michael R. Pinsky
    • 1
  1. 1.Cardiopulmonary Research Laboratory, Department of Critical Care MedicineUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical CenterPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Critical Care Department, Hospital de Sabadell, Institut Universitari Fundació Parc TauliUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations