The metrics of glycaemic control in critical care
- 514 Downloads
Trials of tight glucose control have compared measures of central tendency, such as average blood glucose, and yielded conflicting results. Other metrics, such as standard deviation, reflect different properties of glucose control and are also associated with changes in outcome. It is possible, therefore, that the conflicting results from interventional studies arise from effects on glycaemic control that have not been reported.
Using glucose measurements from patients admitted to four adult intensive care units in one UK hospital, we sought to identify metrics of glycaemic control, examine the relationship between them and identify the metrics that are both independently and most strongly associated with outcome.
We examined nine previously described metrics and identified a further four. Cluster analysis classified these metrics into two families, namely, those reflecting measures of central tendency and those reflecting measures of dispersion. A measure of minimum glucose was also identified but related to neither family. Plots of the quintiles of these metrics against hospital mortality revealed population-specific relationships. Areas under receiver-operating characteristic curves could not identify an optimum metric of central tendency or dispersion. Using odds ratios, we were able to show that the effect of these metrics is independent of one another.
Our results suggest that glycaemic control is associated with outcome on the basis of three independent metrics, reflecting measures of central tendency, measures of dispersion and a measure of minimum glucose.
KeywordsBlood glucose Metrics Critical care Adults Prognosis
- 4.Bochicchio GV, Joshi M, Bochicchio KM, Pyle A, Johnson SB, Meyer W, Lumpkins K, Scalea TM (2007) Early hyperglycemic control is important in critically injured trauma patients. J Trauma 63:1353–1358; discussion 1358–1359Google Scholar
- 10.Scalea TM, Bochicchio GV, Bochicchio KM, Johnson SB, Joshi M, Pyle A (2007) Tight glycemic control in critically injured trauma patients. Ann Surg 246:605–610; discussion 610–602Google Scholar
- 11.Arabi YM, Dabbagh OC, Tamim HM, Al-Shimemeri AA, Memish ZA, Haddad SH, Syed SJ, Giridhar HR, Rishu AH, Al-Daker MO, Kahoul SH, Britts RJ, Sakkijha MH (2008) Intensive versus conventional insulin therapy: a randomized controlled trial in medical and surgical critically ill patients. Crit Care Med 36:3190–3197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.De La Rosa G, Donado JH, Restrepo AH, Quintero AM, Gonzalez LG, Saldarriaga NE, Bedoya M, Toro JM, Velasquez JB, Valencia JC, Arango CM, Aleman PH, Vasquez EM, Chavarriaga JC, Yepes A, Pulido W, Cadavid CA (2008) Strict glycaemic control in patients hospitalised in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit: a randomised clinical trial. Crit Care 12:R120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Finfer S, Chittock DR, Su SY, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V, Bellomo R, Cook D, Dodek P, Henderson WR, Hebert PC, Heritier S, Heyland DK, McArthur C, McDonald E, Mitchell I, Myburgh JA, Norton R, Potter J, Robinson BG, Ronco JJ (2009) Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 360:1283–1297CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Meyfroidt G, Keenan DM, Wang X, Wouters PJ, Veldhuis JD, Van den Berghe G (2010) Dynamic characteristics of blood glucose time series during the course of critical illness: effects of intensive insulin therapy and relative association with mortality. Crit Care Med 38:1021–1029CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Pachler C, Plank J, Weinhandl H, Chassin LJ, Wilinska ME, Kulnik R, Kaufmann P, Smolle KH, Pilger E, Pieber TR, Ellmerer M, Hovorka R (2008) Tight glycaemic control by an automated algorithm with time-variant sampling in medical ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 34:1224–1230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Vogelzang M, Nijboer JM, van der Horst IC, Zijlstra F, ten Duis HJ, Nijsten MW (2006) Hyperglycemia has a stronger relation with outcome in trauma patients than in other critically ill patients. J Trauma 60:873–877; discussion 878–879Google Scholar
- 40.Mowery NT, Gunter OL, Guillamondegui O, Dossett LA, Dortch MJ, Morris JA Jr., May AK (2009) Stress insulin resistance is a marker for mortality in traumatic brain injury. J Trauma 66:145–151; discussion 151–143Google Scholar
- 41.Dossett LA, Cao H, Mowery NT, Dortch MJ, Morris JM Jr., May AK (2008) Blood glucose variability is associated with mortality in the surgical intensive care unit. Am Surg 74:679–685; discussion 685Google Scholar
- 44.Brunkhorst FM, Engel C, Bloos F, Meier-Hellmann A, Ragaller M, Weiler N, Moerer O, Gruendling M, Oppert M, Grond S, Olthoff D, Jaschinski U, John S, Rossaint R, Welte T, Schaefer M, Kern P, Kuhnt E, Kiehntopf M, Hartog C, Natanson C, Loeffler M, Reinhart K (2008) Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis. N Engl J Med 358:125–139CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Preiser J-C, Devos P, Ruiz-Santana S, Mélot C, Annane D, Groeneveld J, Iapichino G, Leverve X, Nitenberg G, Singer P, Wernerman J, Joannidis M, Stecher A, Chioléro R (2009) A prospective randomised multi-centre controlled trial on tight glucose control by intensive insulin therapy in adult intensive care units: the Glucontrol study. Intensive Care Med 35:1738–1748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar