Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 37, Issue 3, pp 385–393 | Cite as

International standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine in Europe

  • The CoBaTrICE CollaborationEmail author
Special Article

Abstract

Purpose

To develop internationally harmonised standards for programmes of training in intensive care medicine (ICM).

Methods

Standards were developed by using consensus techniques. A nine-member nominal group of European intensive care experts developed a preliminary set of standards. These were revised and refined through a modified Delphi process involving 28 European national coordinators representing national training organisations using a combination of moderated discussion meetings, email, and a Web-based tool for determining the level of agreement with each proposed standard, and whether the standard could be achieved in the respondent’s country.

Results

The nominal group developed an initial set of 52 possible standards which underwent four iterations to achieve maximal consensus. All national coordinators approved a final set of 29 standards in four domains: training centres, training programmes, selection of trainees, and trainers’ profiles. Only three standards were considered immediately achievable by all countries, demonstrating a willingness to aspire to quality rather than merely setting a minimum level. Nine proposed standards which did not achieve full consensus were identified as potential candidates for future review.

Conclusions

This preliminary set of clearly defined and agreed standards provides a transparent framework for assuring the quality of training programmes, and a foundation for international harmonisation and quality improvement of training in ICM.

Keywords

Intensive care Critical care Training Accreditation Standards Quality assurance CoBaTrICE 

Notes

Acknowledgments

D. d’Hoir, N. Le Devic (European Society of Intensive Care Medicine); N. Middleton, B. Lafferty, C. Edwards (University of Birmingham); K. Tulkis, J. Aulehle, L. Beech, V. Wiggins (ECOTEC); C. van der Vleuten (University of Maastricht). The project is partly funded by a grant from the European Union Leonardo Da Vinci program, with support from the University of Birmingham, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Cardiff University, University of Maastricht, University of Mater Misericordiae, CYber Imagination and the simulation group SAInT.

Supplementary material

134_2010_2096_MOESM1_ESM.doc (56 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 56 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Barrett H, Bion JF, On behalf of the CoBaTrICE collaboration (2005) An international survey of training in adult intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 31:553–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    The CoBaTrICE collaboration (2006) Development of core competencies for an international training programme in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 32:1371–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    The CoBaTrICE collaboration (2007) The views of patients and relatives of what makes a good intensivist: a European survey. Intensive Care Med 33:1913–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CoBaTrICE (2010) http://www.cobatrice.org. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  5. 5.
    The CoBaTrICE collaboration (2009) The educational environment for training in intensive care medicine: structures, processes, outcomes and challenges in the European region. Intensive Care Med 35:1575–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lilford RJ (2009) Should the NHS strive to eradicate all unexplained variation? No. BMJ 339:b4811. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4809 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NHS Confederation (2004) Variation in healthcare: does it matter and can anything be done? http://www.nhsconfed.org/Publications/Documents/Variation%20in%20healthcare.pdf
  8. 8.
    Richards S (2009) Should the NHS strive to eradicate all unexplained variation? Yes. BMJ 339:b4811. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b4811 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    The European Higher Education Area (1999) Bologna declaration of 19 June 1999. Joint declaration of the European Ministers of Education, http://www.bologna-bergen2005.no/Docs/00-Main_doc/990719BOLOGNA_DECLARATION.PDF
  10. 10.
    European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education (2005) Standards and guidelines for quality assurance in the European higher education area. European Association for Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Helsinki. http://www.enqa.eu/files/BergenReport210205.pdf
  11. 11.
    Thompson M (2009) Considering the implication of variations within Delphi research. Fam Pract 26:420–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dakley NC (1969) The Delphi method: an experimental study of group opinion. Rand, Santa Monica, pp 1–79Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jones J, Hunter D (1995) Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311:376–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buckley JD, Addrizzo-Harris DJ, Clay AS et al (2009) Multisociety task force recommendations of competencies in pulmonary and critical care medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:290–295. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200904-0521ST CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Zanten M, Boulet JR, Simon FA (2010) Flexner’s global influence: medical education accreditation in countries that train physicians who pursue residency in the United States. Acad Med 85:324–332. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181c87638 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karle H (2006) Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME. Acad Med 81:S43–S48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    World Federation for Medical Education (2003) Postgraduate medical education—WFME global standards for quality improvement: University of Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.wfme.org/. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  18. 18.
    Australian Medical Council (2010) Assessing specialist medical education and training. http://www.amc.org.au/index.php/ar/sme. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  19. 19.
    Cassie JM, Armbruster JS, Bowmer MI, Leach DC (2002) Accreditation of postgraduate medical education in the United States and Canada: a comparison of two systems. Med Educ 33:493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2007) ACGME institutional requirements checklist. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/irc/IRCheckList-07.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  21. 21.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education: ACGME number of accredited programs for the current academic year. http://www.acgme.org/adspublic/reports/accredited_programs.asp. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  22. 22.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. ACGME program requirements submitted for review and comment. http://www.acgme.org/acWebsite/reviewComment/rev_programReq_Index.asp. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  23. 23.
    The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (2009) General standards of accreditation. http://rcpsc.medical.org/residency/accreditation/genstandards_e.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  24. 24.
    The CanMEDS Physician Competency Framework (2010) http://rcpsc.medical.org/canmeds/index.php. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  25. 25.
    Flexner A (1910) Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanazaro PJ (1976) Medical audit, continuing medical education and quality assurance. West J Med 125:241–252PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jones ML, Hobson RS, Plasschaert AJM, Gundersen S, Dummer P, Roger-Leroi V, Sidlauskas A, Hamlin J (2007) Quality assurance and benchmarking: an approach for European dental schools. Eur J Dental Educ 11:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Poorterman JHG, van Weert CM, Eijkman MAJ (1998) Quality assurance in dentistry: the Dutch approach. Int J Qual Health Care 10:345–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    De Vos M, Graafmans W, Kooistra M, Meijboom B, Van der Voort P, Westert G (2009) Using quality indicators to improve hospital care: a review of the literature. Int J Qual Health Care 21:119–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Walshe K (2009) Pseudoinnovation: the development and spread of healthcare quality improvement methodologies. Int J Qual Health Care 21:153–159CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beck AH (2004) The Flexner report and the standardization of American medical education. JAMA 291:2139–2140CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Donabedian A (2002) An introduction to quality assurance in health care. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Postgraduate Medical Education & Training Board (2009) National training surveys 2008-2009. Postgraduate Medical Education & Training Board: London. http://www.gmc-uk.org/National_Training_Surveys_2008_09_20090929.pdf_30512348.pdf. Accessed 11 Aug 2010
  34. 34.
    Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (2010) The Outcomes Project. (http://www.acgme.org/outcome. Accessed 3 Aug 2010

Copyright information

© Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESICMAvenue Joseph Loybran 40BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations