Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs: bench evaluation of efficacy and mechanics
Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation through nasal prongs (nHFOV) has been proposed as a new respiratory support in neonatology. We studied the effect of ventilation parameters and nasal prongs on nHFOV efficacy and mechanics.
Customized sealed circuits connecting a SM3100A oscillator to a neonatal lung model were developed to evaluate the effect of applying HFOV via two different sized nasal prongs on delivered tidal volume and pressure. Measurements were made across a range of frequencies and pressures; amplitude was set to obtain visible lung oscillation.
Volume delivered by peak-to-peak oscillation, ventilation, and pressure significantly differed among the interfaces, being higher for large cannulae and the control circuit (p < 0.0001). The interposition of a large or small nasal prong reduced volume to 56 and 26%, ventilation to 32 and 9%, and mean pressure to 83 and 79%, respectively, of the values measured for the direct connection of the oscillator to the test lung. Volume and ventilation were inversely related to frequency, which was particularly evident with larger diameter circuits due to higher delivered tidal volume (R2 > 0.9). Increasing ventilation was associated with larger tidal volume and nasal prong diameter (adjusted R2 = 0.97).
nHFOV using common nasal prongs is technically possible. Efficiency of tidal volume delivery is significantly affected by prong diameter.
KeywordsBench study HFOV Noninvasive ventilation Preterm neonate
Ventilation during HFOV
High frequency oscillatory ventilation
Nasal noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Mean pressure at the airway opening
Peak-to-peak pressure amplitude
Distal pressure measured at the lung model
- 2.Henderson-Smart DJ, De Paoli AG, Clark RH, Bhuta T (2009) High frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for infants with severe pulmonary dysfunction born at or near term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD002974Google Scholar
- 4.Henderson-Smart DJ, Cools F, Bhuta T, Offringa M (2007) Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD000104Google Scholar
- 5.Hofhuis W, Huysman MW, van der Wiel EC, Holland WP, Hop WC, Brinkhorst G, de Jongste JC, Merkus P (2002) Worsening of V′max FRC in infants with chronic lung disease in the first year of life: a more favorable outcome after high frequency oscillation ventilation. Am J Resp Crit Care Med 166:1539–1543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Norusis M (2004) SPSS 13.0 advanced statistical procedures companion. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle-RiverGoogle Scholar
- 24.Boynton BR, Carlo WA (1994) Pulmonary gas exchange during high frequency ventilation. In: Boyton BR, Carlo WA, Jobe AH (eds) New therapies for neonatal respiratory failure. A physiological approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 218–244Google Scholar