Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 36, Issue 9, pp 1495–1504 | Cite as

End-of-life decision-making and quality of ICU performance: an observational study in 84 Italian units

  • Guido Bertolini
  • Simona Boffelli
  • Paolo Malacarne
  • Mario Peta
  • Mariano Marchesi
  • Camillo Barbisan
  • Stefano Tomelleri
  • Simonetta Spada
  • Roberto Satolli
  • Bruno Gridelli
  • Ivo Lizzola
  • Davide Mazzon
Original

Abstract

Purpose

To appraise the end-of-life decision-making in several intensive care units (ICUs) and to evaluate the association between the average inclination to limit treatment and overall survival at ICU level.

Design

Prospective, multicenter, observational study, lasting 12 months.

Setting

Eighty-four Italian, adult ICUs.

Patients

Consecutive patients (3,793) who died in ICU or were discharged in terminal condition, in 2005.

Measurements

Data collection included patient description, treatment limitation and decision-makers, involvement of patients and relatives in the decision, and organ donation. A logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of treatment limitation and develop a measure of the inclination to limit treatment for each ICU. This was compared with the standardized mortality ratio, an index of the overall performance of the unit.

Results

Treatment limitation preceded 62% of deaths. In 25% of cases, nurses were involved in the decision. Half the limitations were do-not-resuscitate orders, with the remaining half almost equally split between withholding and withdrawing treatment. Units less inclined to limit treatments (odds ratio <0.77) showed higher overall standardized mortality ratio (1.08; 95% confidence interval: 1.04–1.12).

Limitations

The voluntary nature of participation, with self-selected ICUs from a self-selected independent network.

Conclusions

Treatment limitation is common in ICU and still principally a physician’s responsibility. Units with below-average inclination to limit treatments have worse performance in terms of overall mortality, showing that limitation is not against the patient’s interests. On the contrary, the inclination to limit treatments at the end of life can be taken as an indication of quality in the unit.

Keywords

Intensive care units Critically ill End-of-life Decision-making Ethics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Guido Bertolini had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. The study was wholly funded by GiViTI-Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Bergamo (Italy), Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IsMeTT), Palermo (Italy), and Centro di Ricerca Interdisciplinare Scienze Umane, Salute e Malattia, Università degli Studi, Bergamo (Italy). GiViTI is the recipient of unconditioned grants from AstraZeneca Italy and Draeger Italia, which did not, however, have any role in this study. The authors would like to thank Abramo Anghileri and Michele Giardino (Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri) for having developed the data collection software, and Warren Blumberg for his help in editing this paper.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Supplementary material

134_2010_1910_MOESM1_ESM.doc (266 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 265 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Anonymous (2001) Medical treatment at the end of life. A position statement. Clin Med 1:115–117Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    SIAARTI (2006) End-of-life care and the intensivist: SIAARTI recommendations on the management of the dying patient. Minerva Anestesiol 72:927–963Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, Cassell J, Cox P, Hill N, Hinds C, Pimentel JM, Reinhart K, Thompson BT (2004) Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the fifth international consensus conference in critical care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 30:770–784Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Patrick DL, Curtis JR, Engelberg RA, Nielsen E, McCown E (2003) Measuring and improving the quality of dying and death. Ann Intern Med 139:410–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Selecky PA, Eliasson CA, Hall RI, Schneider RF, Varkey B, McCaffree DR (2005) Palliative and end-of-life care for patients with cardiopulmonary diseases: American college of chest physicians position statement. Chest 128:3599–3610CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Truog RD, Cist AF, Brackett SE, Burns JP, Curley MA, Danis M, DeVita MA, Rosenbaum SH, Rothenberg DM, Sprung CL, Webb SA, Wlody GS, Hurford WE (2001) Recommendations for end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: The Ethics Committee of the society of critical care medicine. Crit Care Med 29:2332–2348CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boffelli S, Rossi C, Anghileri A, Giardino M, Carnevale L, Messina M, Neri M, Langer M, Bertolini G (2006) Continuous quality improvement in intensive care medicine. The GiViTI Margherita project—Report 2005. Minerva Anestesiol 72:419–432PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boffelli S, Rossi C, Bertolini G (2006) Progetto Margherita, Promuovere la ricerca e la valutazione in Terapia Intensiva. Rapporto 2005. (English version available at: http://www.giviti.marionegri.it/MargheritaDue.asp). Ed. Sestante, Bergamo
  9. 9.
    Teres D (2004) The value and limits of severity adjusted mortality for ICU patients. J Crit Care 19:257–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1995) Confidence interval estimates of an index of quality performance based on logistic regression models. Stat Med 14:2161–2172CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sprung CL, Cohen SL, Sjokvist P, Baras M, Bulow HH, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Lippert A, Maia P, Phelan D, Schobersberger W, Wennberg E, Woodcock T (2003) End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus study. JAMA 290:790–797CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM (1998) A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 158:1163–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferrand E, Robert R, Ingrand P, Lemaire F (2001) Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey. French LATAREA Group. Lancet 357:9–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wunsch H, Harrison DA, Harvey S, Rowan K (2005) End-of-life decisions: a cohort study of the withdrawal of all active treatment in intensive care units in the United Kingdom. Intensive Care Med 31:823–831CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Azoulay E, Metnitz B, Sprung CL, Timsit JF, Lemaire F, Bauer P, Schlemmer B, Moreno R, Metnitz P (2009) End-of-life practices in 282 intensive care units: data from the SAPS 3 database. Intensive Care Med 35:623–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    White DB, Curtis JR, Wolf LE, Prendergast TJ, Taichman DB, Kuniyoshi G, Acerra F, Lo B, Luce JM (2007) Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides? Ann Intern Med 147:34–40PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Azoulay E, Pochard F, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Moreau D, Montesino L, Adrie C, de Lassence A, Cohen Y, Timsit JF (2003) Decisions to forgo life-sustaining therapy in ICU patients independently predict hospital death. Intensive Care Med 29:1895–1901CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Esteban A, Gordo F, Solsona JF, Alia I, Caballero J, Bouza C, Alcala-Zamora J, Cook DJ, Sanchez JM, Abizanda R, Miro G, Fernandez Del Cabo MJ, de Miguel E, Santos JA, Balerdi B (2001) Withdrawing and withholding life support in the intensive care unit: a Spanish prospective multi-centre observational study. Intensive Care Med 27:1744–1749CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cook D, Rocker G, Marshall J, Sjokvist P, Dodek P, Griffith L, Freitag A, Varon J, Bradley C, Levy M, Finfer S, Hamielec C, McMullin J, Weaver B, Walter S, Guyatt G (2003) Withdrawal of mechanical ventilation in anticipation of death in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 349:1123–1132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Luce JM (1997) Withholding and withdrawal of life support: ethical, legal, and clinical aspects. New Horiz 5:30–37PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anonymous (1991) Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. This official statement of the American thoracic society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, March 1991. Am Rev Respir Dis 144:726–731Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miller PA, Forbes S, Boyle DK (2001) End-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a challenge for nurses. Am J Crit Care 10:230–237PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Copyright jointly held by Springer and ESICM 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Bertolini
    • 1
  • Simona Boffelli
    • 1
  • Paolo Malacarne
    • 2
  • Mario Peta
    • 3
  • Mariano Marchesi
    • 4
  • Camillo Barbisan
    • 5
  • Stefano Tomelleri
    • 6
  • Simonetta Spada
    • 7
  • Roberto Satolli
    • 8
  • Bruno Gridelli
    • 9
    • 10
  • Ivo Lizzola
    • 6
  • Davide Mazzon
    • 11
  1. 1.Laboratorio di Epidemiologia Clinica, Centro di Ricerche Cliniche per le Malattie Rare Aldo e Cele DaccòIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario NegriRanicaItaly
  2. 2.Servizio di Anestesia, Rianimazione e Pronto SoccorsoOspedale di S. ChiaraPisaItaly
  3. 3.I Servizio Anestesia e RianimazioneOspedale Regionale Ca’ FoncelloTrevisoItaly
  4. 4.I Servizio Anestesia e RianimazioneOspedali RiunitiBergamoItaly
  5. 5.Comitato EticoOspedale Regionale Ca’ FoncelloTrevisoItaly
  6. 6.Centro di Ricerca Interdisciplinare Scienze UmaneSalute e Malattia, Università degli StudiBergamoItaly
  7. 7.Servizio di Psicologia ClinicaOspedali RiunitiBergamoItaly
  8. 8.Agenzia ZadigMilanItaly
  9. 9.Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IsMeTT)PalermoItaly
  10. 10.University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC)PittsburghUSA
  11. 11.Servizio Anestesia e RianimazioneOspedale Civile San MartinoBellunoItaly

Personalised recommendations