Development and validation of a questionnaire for quantitative assessment of perceived discomforts in critically ill patients
- 840 Downloads
To develop and validate the IPREA (Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation) questionnaire for the assessment of discomfort perceived by patients related to their intensive care unit (ICU) stay.
This was a two step-study comprising a phase of item generation conducted in one ICU and a phase of psychometric evaluation during a multicenter prospective cohort study in 14 ICUs. Patients were unselected consecutive adult surviving ICU patients. On the day of ICU discharge, a nurse asked patients to rate the severity of 16 discomfort sources, from 0 to 100. Ten percent of patients were randomly chosen to be questioned again to assess the reproducibility.
Of 1,380 eligible patients, 1,113 survived and 868 patients could be questioned. The highest scores were for sleep deprivation (35 ± 33), being restrained by tubing, wires, and cables (33 ± 30), pain (32 ± 30), and thirst (32 ± 34). No multidimensional structure was identified. The mean overall score of discomfort was 22 ± 14. Internal consistency was satisfactory using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (0.78). The test–retest reliability study found average measure intraclass correlations ranging from 0.70 to 0.92. The mean duration of the questionnaire administration was 10 ± 7 min.
The psychometric properties and acceptability of the IPREA questionnaire make it a potential instrument for measuring discomfort perceived by unselected ICU patients.
KeywordsCritical care Discomfort Outcome Visual analog scale Sleep deprivation Pain Thirst Anxiety Noise
We thank all members of the nursing staff of each participating ICU for their strong involvement and motivation in the study.
- 19.Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Jaeschke R (1996) How to develop and validate a new health related quality of life instrument. Lippincott-Raven, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 20.Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Statistical foundations. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 22.Simeoni M, Auquier P, Fernandez O, Flachenecker P, Stecchi S, Constantinescu C, Idiman E, Boyko A, Beiske A, Vollmer T, Triantafyllou N, O’Connor P, Barak Y, Biermann L, Cristiano E, Atweh S, Patrick D, Robitail S, Ammoury N, Beresniak A, Pelletier J, MusiQol study group (2008) Validation of the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life questionnaire. Mult Scler 14:219–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Honkus VL (2003) Sleep deprivation in critical care units. Crit Care Nurs Q 26:179–189; 190–191Google Scholar
- 32.Linacre MJ, Wright BD (1998) A user’s guide to WinSteps, Rasch-model computer programs. MESA Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 33.Wright BD, Stone MH (1979) Best test design: Rasch measurement. MESA Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- 34.Angoff WH (1993) Perspectives on differential item functioning methodology. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
- 35.Ware JE, Harris WJ, Gandek B, Reese PR (1997) MAP-R for Windows: Multitrait/multiitem analysis program-revised user’s guide. Health Assessment Lab, BostonGoogle Scholar