Death in emergency departments: a multicenter cross-sectional survey with analysis of withholding and withdrawing life support
- 685 Downloads
To describe the characteristics of patients who die in emergency departments and the decisions to withhold or withdraw life support.
We undertook a 4-month prospective survey in 174 emergency departments in France and Belgium to describe patients who died and the decisions to limit life-support therapies.
Of 2,512 patients enrolled, 92 (3.7%) were excluded prior to analysis because of missing data; 1,196 were men and 1,224 were women (mean age 77.3 ± 15 years). Of patients, 1,970 (81.4%) had chronic underlying diseases, and 1,114 (46%) had a previous functional limitation. Principal acute presenting disorders were cardiovascular, neurological, and respiratory. Life-support therapy was initiated in 1,781 patients (73.6%). Palliative care was undertaken for 1,373 patients (56.7%). A decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments was taken for 1,907 patients (78.8%) and mostly concerned patients over 80 years old, with underlying metastatic cancer or previous functional limitation. Decisions were discussed with family or relatives in 58.4% of cases. The decision was made by a single ED physician in 379 cases (19.9%), and by at least two ED physicians in 1,528 cases (80.1%).
Death occurring in emergency departments mainly concerned elderly patients with multiple chronic diseases and was frequently preceded by a decision to withdraw and/or withhold life-support therapies. Training of future ED physicians must be aimed at improving the level of care of dying patients, with particular emphasis on collegial decision-taking and institution of palliative care.
KeywordsDeath Emergency medicine Ethic End of life Palliative care
This study was financed by a grant from the French Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique.
- 3.Roupie E (1999) La mort aux urgences: enquête prospective préliminaire. In: Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (ed) Actualité en réanimation et urgences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 281–289Google Scholar
- 10.American College of Emergency physicians (1997) Code of ethics for emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med 30:365–372Google Scholar
- 12.Société Française de Médecine d’Urgence (2003) Ethique et urgences. Réflexions et recommandations de la Société Francophone de Médecine d’Urgence. JEUR 16:106–120Google Scholar
- 14.Mac Cabe W, Jackson G (1962) Gram negative bacteremia, etiology and ecology. Arch Intern Med 110:845Google Scholar
- 17.Miro O, De Dios A, Antonio M, Sánchez M, Borrás A, Millá J (1999) Estudio de la mortalidad en un servicio de urgencias de medicina hospitalario: incidencia, causas y consecuencias. Med Clin (Barc) 112:690–692Google Scholar
- 19.Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques. Les personnes ägées (http://www.insee.fr/fr/ffc/chifcle_fiche.asp?tab_id=108. Accessed Feb 20, 2008)
- 22.Sedillot N, Holzapfel L, Jacquet-Francillon T, Tafaro N, Eskandanian A, Eyraud S, Metton P, Prost S, Serre P, Souton L (2008) A five-step protocol for withholding and withdrawing of life support in an emergency department: an observational study. Eur J Emerg Med 15:145–149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Carlet J, Thijs LG, Antonelli M, Cassell J, Cox P, Hill N, Hinds C, Pimentel JM, Reinhart K, Thompson BT (2004) Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care: Brussels, Belgium, April 2003. Intensive Care Med 30:770–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Journal Officiel de la république française. Loi 2005-370 relative aux droits des malades et à la fin de vieGoogle Scholar