Intensive Care Medicine

, 35:2068

Conflicts in the ICU: perspectives of administrators and clinicians

  • Nathalie Danjoux Meth
  • Bernard Lawless
  • Laura Hawryluck



The purpose of this study is to understand conflicts in the ICU setting as experienced by clinicians and administrators and explore methods currently used to resolve such conflicts when there may be discordance between clinicians and families, caregivers or administration.


Qualitative case study methodology using semi-structured interviews was used. The sample included community and academic health science centres in 16 hospitals from across the province of Ontario, Canada. A total of 42 participants including hospital administrators and ICU clinicians were interviewed. Participants were sampled purposively to ensure representation.


The most common source of conflict in the ICU is a result of disagreement about the goals of treatment. Such conflicts arise between the ICU and referring teams (inter-team), among members of the ICU team (intra-team), and between the ICU team and patients’ family/substitute decision-maker (SDM). Inter- and intra-team conflicts often contribute to conflicts between the ICU team and families. Various themes were identified as contributing factors that may influence conflict resolution practices as well as the various consequences and challenges of conflict situations. Limitations of current conflict resolution policies were revealed as well as suggested strategies to improve practice.


There is considerable variability in dealing with conflicts in the ICU. Greater attention is needed at a systems level to support a culture aimed at prevention and resolution of conflicts to avoid increased sources of anxiety, stress and burnout.


Conflicts Dispute Conflict resolution Adult MS ICU 


  1. 1.
    Heyland DK, Dodek P, Rocker G, Groll D, Gafni A, Pichora D, Shortt S, Tranmer J, Lazar N, Kutsogiannis J, Lam M, Canadian Researchers End-of-Life Network (CARENET) (2006) What matters most in end-of-life care: perceptions of seriously ill patients and their family members. CMAJ 174:627–633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Azoulay E, Pochard F, Kentish-Barnes N, Chevret S, Aboab J, Adrie C, Annane D, Bleichner G, Bollaert PE, Darmon M, Fassier T, Galliot R, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Goulenok C, Goldgran-Toledano D, Hayon J, Jourdain M, Kaidomar M, Laplace C, Larché J, Liotier J, Papazian L, Poisson C, Reignier J, Saidi F, Schlemmer B, FAMIREA Study Group (2005) Risk of post-traumatic stress symptoms in family members of intensive care unit patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 171:987–994CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Studdert DM, Mello MM, Burns JP, Puopolo AL, Galper BZ, Truog RD, Brennan TA (2003) Conflict in the care of patients with prolonged stay in the ICU: types, sources, and predictors. Intensive Care Med 29:1489–1497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burns JP, Mello MM, Studdert DM, Puopolo AL, Truog RD, Brennan TA (2003) Results of a clinical trial on care improvement for the critically ill. Crit Care Med 31:2107–2117CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher M (2004) Ethical issues in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care 10:292–298CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oberle K, Hughes D (2001) Doctors’ and nurses’ perceptions of ethical problems in end-of-life decisions. J Adv Nurs 33:707–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fetters MD, Churchill L, Danis M (2001) Conflict resolution at the end of life. Crit Care Med 29:921–925CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Breen CM, Abernethy AP, Abbott KH, Tulsky JA (2001) Conflict associated with decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units. J Gen Intern Med 16:283–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Poncet MC, Toullic P, Papazian L, Kentish-Barnes N, Timsit JF, Pochard F, Chevret S, Schlemmer B, Azoulay E (2007) Burnout syndrome in critical care nursing staff. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 175:698–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Coyne IT (1997) Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? J Adv Nurs 26:623–630CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Denzin NK (2000) Handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Creswell J (1998) Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. Sage, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frick S, Uehlinger D, Zuercher Zenklusen R (2003) Medical futility: predicting outcome of intensive care unit patients by nurses and doctors––a prospective comparative study. Crit Care Med 31:456–461CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ferrand E, Lemaire F, Regnier B, Kuteifan K, Badet M, Asfar P, Jaber S, Chagnon JL, Renault A, Robert R, Pochard F, Herve C, Brun-Buisson C, Duvaldestin P, French RESSENTI Group (2003) Discrepancies between perceptions by physicians and nursing staff of intensive care unit end-of-life decisions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 164:1310–1315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Asch DA, Shea JA, Jedrziewski MK, Bosk CL (1997) The limits of suffering: critical care nurses’ views of hospital care at the end of life. Soc Sci Med 45:1661–1668CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sprung CL, Woodcock T, Sjokvist P, Ricou B, Bulow HH, Lippert A, Maia P, Cohen S, Baras M, Hovilehto S, Ledoux D, Phelan D, Wennberg E, Schobersberger W (2008) Reasons, considerations, difficulties and documentation of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units: the ETHICUS Study. Intensive Care Med 34:271–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Azoulay E, Sprung CL (2004) Family–physician interactions in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 32:2323–2328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cook DJ, Giacomini M, Johnson N, Willms D (1999) Life support in the intensive care unit: a qualitative investigation of technological purposes. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. CMAJ 161:1109–1113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Curtis JR, Shannon SE (2006) Transcending the silos: toward an interdisciplinary approach to end-of-life care in the ICU. Intensive Care Med 32:15–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dowdy MD, Robertson C, Bander JA (1998) A study of proactive ethics consultation for critically and terminally ill patients with extended lengths of stay. Crit Care Med 26:252–259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schneiderman LJ (2006) Effect of ethics consultations in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 34:S359–S363CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rego Lins Fumis R, Nishimoto IN, Deheinzelin D (2006) Measuring satisfaction in family members of critically ill cancer patients in Brazil. Intensive Care Med 32:124–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Danjoux N, Hawryluck L, Lawless B (2007) Cultural and religious aspects of care in the intensive care unit within the context of patient-centred care. Healthc Q 10:42–50PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Copyright jointly hold by Springer and ESICM 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nathalie Danjoux Meth
    • 1
  • Bernard Lawless
    • 2
  • Laura Hawryluck
    • 3
  1. 1.Critical Care SecretariatTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySt. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Critical Care MedicineUniversity Health NetworkTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations