Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 35, Issue 8, pp 1352–1361 | Cite as

Acute respiratory failure in intensive care units. FINNALI: a prospective cohort study

  • Rita LinkoEmail author
  • Marjatta Okkonen
  • Ville Pettilä
  • Juha Perttilä
  • Ilkka Parviainen
  • Esko Ruokonen
  • Jyrki Tenhunen
  • Tero Ala-Kokko
  • Tero Varpula
  • The FINNALI-study group
Original

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the incidence, treatment and mortality of acute respiratory failure (ARF) in Finnish intensive care units (ICUs).

Study design

Prospective multicentre cohort study.

Methods

All adult patients in 25 ICUs were screened for use of invasive or non-invasive ventilatory support during an 8-week period. Patients needing ventilatory support for more than 6 h were included and defined as ARF patients. Risk factors for ARF and details of prior chronic health status were assessed. Ventilatory and concomitant treatments were evaluated and recorded daily throughout the ICU stay. ICU and 90-day mortalities were assessed.

Results

A total of 958 (39%) from the 2,473 admitted patients were treated with ventilatory support for more than 6 h. Incidence of ARF, acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was 149.5, 10.6 and 5.0/100,000 per year, respectively. Ventilatory support was started with non-invasive interfaces in 183 of 958 (19%) patients. Ventilatory modes allowing triggering of spontaneous breaths were preferred (81%). Median tidal volume/predicted body weight was 8.7 (7.6–9.9) ml/kg and plateau pressure 19 (16–23) cmH2O. The 90-day mortality of ARF was 31%.

Conclusions

While the incidence of ARF requiring ventilatory support is higher, the incidence of ALI and ARDS seems to be lower in Finland than previously reported in other countries. Tidal volumes are higher than recommended in the concept of lung protective strategy. However, restriction of peak airway pressure was used in the majority of ARF patients.

Keywords

Acute respiratory failure Acute lung injury Acute respiratory distress syndrome Mechanical ventilation Outcome 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the principal study nurse Raija Niemi and all investigators and study nurses of the FINNALI study in the participating hospitals. The study was supported by an EVO grant from Helsinki University Hospital (TYH7250), Instrumentarium Scientific Foundation, external funding for Critical Care Medicine Research Group in Tampere, Health Care Foundation of North Finland and EVO grants from North Karelia, South Savo and Satakunta Central Hospitals.

Supplementary material

134_2009_1519_MOESM1_ESM.doc (86 kb)
(DOC 87 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Roupie E, Lepage E, Wysocki M, Fagon JY, Chastre J, Dreyfuss D, Mentec H, Carlet J, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F, Brochard L (1999) Prevalence, etiologies and outcome of the acute respiratory distress syndrome among hypoxemic ventilated patients. SRLF Collaborative Group on Mechanical Ventilation. Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise. Intensive Care Med 25:920–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Demoule A, Girou E, Richard JC, Taille S, Brochard L (2006) Increased use of noninvasive ventilation in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 32:1747–1755PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vincent JL, Akca S, De Mendonca A, Haji-Michael P, Sprung C, Moreno R, Antonelli M, Suter PM, SOFA Working Group. Sequntial organ failure assessment (2002) The epidemiology of acute respiratory failure in critically ill patients (*). Chest 121:1602–1609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flaatten H, Gjerde S, Guttormsen AB, Haugen O, Hoivik T, Onarheim H, Aardal S (2003) Outcome after acute respiratory failure is more dependent on dysfunction in other vital organs than on the severity of the respiratory failure. Crit Care 7:R72–R77PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luhr OR, Antonsen K, Karlsson M, Aardal S, Thorsteinsson A, Frostell CG, Bonde J (1999) Incidence and mortality after acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome in Sweden, Denmark, and Iceland. The ARF Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:1849–1861PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brun-Buisson C, Minelli C, Bertolini G, Brazzi L, Pimentel J, Lewandowski K, Bion J, Romand JA, Villar J, Thorsteinsson A, Damas P, Armaganidis A, Lemaire F, ALIVE Study Group (2004) Epidemiology and outcome of acute lung injury in European intensive care units. Results from the ALIVE study. Intensive Care Med 30:51–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernard G, Artigas A, Brigham K, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall J, Morris A, Spragg R (1994) The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 149:818–824PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    21st ESICM Annual Congress (2008) Intensive Care Med. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1241-2
  9. 9.
    Uusaro A, Parviainen I, Tenhunen JJ, Ruokonen E (2005) The proportion of intensive care unit admissions related to alcohol use: a prospective cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49:1236–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network (2000) Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 342:1301–1308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacIntyre NR, Epstein SK, Carson S, Scheinhorn D, Christopher K, Muldoon S, National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care (2005) Management of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: report of a NAMDRC consensus conference. Chest 128:3937–3954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Esteban A, Ferguson ND, Meade MO, Frutos-Vivar F, Apezteguia C, Brochard L, Raymondos K, Nin N, Hurtado J, Tomicic V, Gonzalez M, Elizalde J, Nightingale P, Abroug F, Pelosi P, Arabi Y, Moreno R, Jibaja M, D’Empaire G, Sandi F, Matamis D, Montanez AM, Anzueto A, VENTILA Group (2008) Evolution of mechanical ventilation in response to clinical research. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177:170–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Carlucci A, Delmastro M, Rubini F, Fracchia C, Nava S (2003) Changes in the practice of non-invasive ventilation in treating COPD patients over 8 years. Intensive Care Med 29:419–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demoule A, Girou E, Richard JC, Taille S, Brochard L (2006) Benefits and risks of success or failure of noninvasive ventilation. Intensive Care Med 32:1756–1765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Antonelli M, Conti G, Moro ML, Esquinas A, Gonzalez-Diaz G, Confalonieri M, Pelaia P, Principi T, Gregoretti C, Beltrame F, Pennisi MA, Arcangeli A, Proietti R, Passariello M, Meduri GU (2001) Predictors of failure of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a multi-center study. Intensive Care Med 27:1718–1728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Paus-Jenssen ES, Reid JK, Cockcroft DW, Laframboise K, Ward HA (2004) The use of noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure at a tertiary care center. Chest 126:165–172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Behrendt CE (2000) Acute respiratory failure in the United States: incidence and 31-day survival. Chest 118:1100–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, Hudson LD (2005) Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 353:1685–1693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bersten AD, Edibam C, Hunt T, Moran J, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group (2002) Incidence and mortality of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome in three Australian States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:443–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ferguson ND, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, Gordo F, Honrubia T, Penuelas O, Algora A, Garcia G, Bustos A, Rodriguez I (2007) Clinical risk conditions for acute lung injury in the intensive care unit and hospital ward: a prospective observational study. Crit Care 11:R96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Aboab J, Louis B, Jonson B, Brochard L (2006) Relation between PaO2/FIO2 ratio and FIO2: a mathematical description. Intensive Care Med 32:1494–1497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Villar J, Perez-Mendez L, Kacmarek RM (1999) Current definitions of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome do not reflect their true severity and outcome. Intensive Care Med 25:930–935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ferguson ND, Kacmarek RM, Chiche JD, Singh JM, Hallett DC, Mehta S, Stewart TE (2004) Screening of ARDS patients using standardized ventilator settings: influence on enrollment in a clinical trial. Intensive Care Med 30:1111–1116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Estenssoro E, Dubin A, Laffaire E, Canales HS, Saenz G, Moseinco M, Bachetti P (2003) Impact of positive end-expiratory pressure on the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 29:1936–1942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Meade MO, Cook RJ, Guyatt GH, Groll R, Kachura JR, Bedard M, Cook DJ, Slutsky AS, Stewart TE (2000) Interobserver variation in interpreting chest radiographs for the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:85–90PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Granton J, Hudson LD, Matthay MA (1999) Interobserver variability in applying a radiographic definition for ARDS. Chest 116:1347–1353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ferguson ND, Meade MO, Hallett DC, Stewart TE (2002) High values of the pulmonary artery wedge pressure in patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med 28:1073–1077PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H, Gerlach H, Calandra T, Cohen J, Gea-Banacloche J, Keh D, Marshall JC, Parker MM, Ramsay G, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL, Levy MM, Surviving Sepsis Campaign Management Guidelines Committee (2004) Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 32:858–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Weinert CR, Gross CR, Marinelli WA (2003) Impact of randomized trial results on acute lung injury ventilator therapy in teaching hospitals. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 167:1304–1309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Young MP, Manning HL, Wilson DL, Mette SA, Riker RR, Leiter JC, Liu SK, Bates JT, Parsons PE (2004) Ventilation of patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: has new evidence changed clinical practice? Crit Care Med 32:1260–1265PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Karlsson S, Varpula M, Ruokonen E, Pettila V, Parviainen I, Ala-Kokko TI, Kolho E, Rintala EM (2007) Incidence, treatment, and outcome of severe sepsis in ICU-treated adults in Finland: the Finnsepsis study. Intensive Care Med 33:435–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gajic O, Dara SI, Mendez JL, Adesanya AO, Festic E, Caples SM, Rana R, St Sauver JL, Lymp JF, Afessa B, Hubmayr RD (2004) Ventilator-associated lung injury in patients without acute lung injury at the onset of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 32:1817–1824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Esteban A, Anzueto A, Frutos F, Alia I, Brochard L, Stewart TE, Benito S, Epstein SK, Apezteguia C, Nightingale P, Arroliga AC, Tobin MJ, Mechanical Ventilation International Study Group (2002) Characteristics and outcomes in adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation: a 28-day international study. JAMA 287:345–355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Schettino Gde P, Lorenzi Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Morais C, Fernandes Ede O, Takagaki TY (1995) Beneficial effects of the “open lung approach” with low distending pressures in acute respiratory distress syndrome. A prospective randomized study on mechanical ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:1835–1846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Karason S, Antonsen K, Aneman A, SSAI ICU-II GROUP (2002) Ventilator treatment in the Nordic countries. A multicenter survey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 46:1053–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Irish Critical Care Trials Group (2008) Acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome in Ireland: a prospective audit of epidemiology and management. Crit Care 12:R30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R, SAFE Study Investigators (2004) A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med 350:2247–2256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Linko
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marjatta Okkonen
    • 1
  • Ville Pettilä
    • 2
  • Juha Perttilä
    • 3
  • Ilkka Parviainen
    • 4
  • Esko Ruokonen
    • 4
  • Jyrki Tenhunen
    • 5
  • Tero Ala-Kokko
    • 6
  • Tero Varpula
    • 1
  • The FINNALI-study group
  1. 1.Intensive Care Units, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Division of SurgeryHelsinki University HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research CenterMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care MedicineTurku University HospitalTurkuFinland
  4. 4.Division of Intensive CareKuopio University HospitalKuopioFinland
  5. 5.Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Critical Care Medicine Research GroupTampere University HospitalTampereFinland
  6. 6.Division of Intensive Care, Department of AnesthesiologyOulu University HospitalOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations