Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 35, Issue 9, pp 1575–1583 | Cite as

The educational environment for training in intensive care medicine: structures, processes, outcomes and challenges in the European region

  • The CoBaTrICE CollaborationEmail author
Original

Abstract

Objective

To characterise the training environment in ICM across Europe, with a particular focus on factors influencing competency-based training.

Method

A cross-sectional web-based survey completed by the national coordinator for the CoBaTrICE (Competency-Based Training in Intensive Care medicinE) programme in each of 28 European countries.

Results

Since the last survey in 2004, 50% of EU countries have modified their training programmes. Seven have already adopted the CoBaTrICE programme since its completion in 2006. Multidisciplinary access to ICM training (‘supraspeciality’ model) is available in 57%, most commonly as a 2-year training programme. National examinations are held by 26 (93%); in 24 (86%) this is a mandatory exit exam; ten use the European Diploma of Intensive Care (EDIC). A formal national system for quality assurance of ICM training exists in only 18 (64%) countries. National standards for approving hospitals as training centres vary widely. In 29% there is no designated specialist with responsibility for training at the local level. Time for teaching was cited as inadequate by 93% of respondents; only 21% of trainers receive contractual recognition for their work. In 39% there is no protected teaching time for trainees. Half of countries surveyed have no formal system for workplace-based assessment of competence of trainees.

Conclusions

There is considerable diversity in pedagogic structures, processes and quality assurance of ICM across Europe. National training organisations should develop common standards for quality assurance, health systems need to invest in educator support, and the EU should facilitate harmonisation by recognising ICM as a multidisciplinary speciality.

Keywords

Intensive care Critical care Training Accreditation Assessment Professional competence 

Notes

Acknowledgments

D. D’Hoir, N. Le Devic (European Society of Intensive Care Medicine), N. Middleton, B.Lafferty, C. Edwards (University of Birmingham); K. Tulkis, J. Aulehle (ECOTEC), C. Van Der Vleuten (University of Maastricht). The project is partly funded by a grant from the European Union Leonardo Da Vinci program, with support from the University of Birmingham, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, University of Maastricht, University of Mater Misericordiae, CYber Imagination and the simulation group SAInT.

Supplementary material

134_2009_1514_MOESM1_ESM.doc (45 kb)
Supplementary material (DOC 45 kb).

References

  1. 1.
    Vincent JL, Baltopoulos G, Bihari D, Blanch L, Burchardi H, Carrington da Costa RB, Edwards D, Iapichino G, Lamy M, Murrillo F, Raphael JC, Suter P, Takala J, Thijs LG, (ESICM task force) (1994) Guidelines for training in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 20:80–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thijs LG, Baltopoulos G, Bihari D, Burchardi H, Carlet J, Chioléro R, Dragsted L, Edwards DJ, Ferdinande P, Giunta F, Kari A, Kox W, Planas M, Vincent JL, Pfenninger J, Edberg KE, Floret D, Leijala M, Tegtmeyer FK, (ESICM, ESPNIC task force) (1996) Guidelines for a training programme in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:166–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bion JF, Ramsay G, Roussos C, Burchardi H, on behalf of the Task Force on Educational issues of the European society of intensive care medicine (1998) Intensive care training and speciality status in Europe: international comparisons. Intensive Care Med 24:372–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Lange S, Van Aken H, Burchardi H (2002) European Society of Intensive Care Medicine statement: Intensive care medicine in Europe––structure, organisation and training guidelines of the Multidisciplinary Joint Committee of Intensive Care Medicine (MJCICM) of the European Union of medical Specialists (UEMS). Intensive Care Med 28:1505–1511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrett H, Bion JF, on behalf of the CoBaTrICE collaboration (2005) An international survey of training in adult intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 31:553–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    The CoBaTrICE collaboration (2006) Development of core competencies for an international training programme in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med 32:1371–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    The CoBaTrICE collaboration (2007) The views of patients and relatives of what makes a good intensivist: a European Survey. Intensive Care Med 33:1913–1920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pronovost P, Rodriguez-Paz J, Mohammad Z (2007) Creating competent and caring physicians: ensuring patients are our North Star. Intensive Care Med 33:1873–1875PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Perkins GD, Barrett H, Bullock I, Gabbott DA, Nolan JP, Mitchell S, Short A, Smith CM, Smith GB, Todd S, Bion JF (2005) The Acute Care Undergraduate TEaching (ACUTE) initiative: consensus development of core competencies in acute care for undergraduates in the United Kingdom. Intensive Care Med 31:1627–1633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith CM, Perkins GD, Bullock I, Bion JF (2007) Undergraduate training in the care of the acutely ill patient: a literature review. Intensive Care Med 33:901–907PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Directive 2005/36/EC of the European parliament & Council on recognition of professional qualifications, 7th September 2005. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2005:255:0022:0142:EN:PDF
  13. 13.
    Fink M, Suter PM (2006) The future of our specialty: Critical care medicine a decade from now. Crit Care Med 34:1811–1816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ESICMAvenue Joseph Loybran 40BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations