Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, 34:2139 | Cite as

Renal replacement therapies: physiological review

  • Claudio RoncoEmail author
  • Zaccaria Ricci
Review

Abstract

Introduction

A physiological review on renal replacement therapies (RRT) is a challenging task: there is nothing "physiologic" about RRT, since the most accurate, safe and perfectly delivered extracorporeal therapy would still be far from "physiologically" replacing the function of the native kidney.

Methods

This review will address the issues of physiology of fluid and solute removal, acid base control and impact on mortality during intermittent and continuous therapies: different RRT modalities and relative prescriptions will provide different "physiological clinical effects" to critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI), with the aim of restoring lost "renal homeostasis". On the other side, however, the "pathophysiology" of RRT, consists with unwanted clinical effects caused by the same treatments, generally under-recognized by current literature but often encountered in clinical practice. Physiology and pathophysiology of different RRT modalities have been reviewed.

Conclusion

Physiology and pathophysiology of RRT often coexist during dialysis sessions. Improvement in renal recovery and survival from AKI will be achieved from optimization of therapy and increased awareness of potential benefits and dangers deriving from different RRT modalities.

Keywords

Renal failure Dialysis and hemofiltration 

References

  1. 1.
    Lauer A, Alvis R, Avram M (1988) Hemodynamic consequences of continuous arteriovenous hemofìltration. Am J Kidney Dis 12:110–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouffard Y, Viale JP, Annat G, Delafosse B, Guillaume C, Motin J (1987) Energy expenditure in the acute renal failure patient mechanically ventilated. Intensive Care Med 13:401–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Frankenfield DC, Reynolds HN (1995) Nutritional effect of continuous hemodiafiltration. Nutrition 11:388–393PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kierdorf HP (1995) The nutritional management of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit. New Horiz 3:699–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bellomo R, Tan K, Bhonagiri S, Gopal I, Seacombe J, Daskalakis M, Boyce N (2002) High protein intake during continuous hemodialfiltration: impact on aminoacids and nitrogen balance. Int J Artif Organs 25:261–268PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibney N, Cerda J, Davenport A, Ramirez J, Singbartl K, Leblanc M, Ronco C (2008) Volume management by renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury. Int J Artif Organs 31:145–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Goldstein SL, Currier H, Graf C, Cosio CC, Brewer ED, Sachdeva R (2001) Outcome in children receiving continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Pediatrics 107:1309–1312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Foland JA, Fortenberry JD, Warshaw BL, Pettignano R, Merritt RK, Heard ML, Rogers K, Reid C, Tanner AJ, Easley KA (2004) Fluid overload before continuous hemofiltration and survival in critically ill children: a retrospective analysis. Crit Care Med 32:1771–1776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Payen D, de Pont AC, Sakr Y, Spies C, Reinhart K, Vincent JL, The Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely Ill Patients (SOAP) Investigators (2008) A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care 12:R74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    La Greca G, Dettori P, Biasioli S, Fabris A, Feriani M, Pinna V, Pisani E, Ronco C (1980) Brain density studies during dialysis. Lancet 13:580Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davenport A, Will EJ, Davison AM (1993) Effect of renal replacement therapy on patients with combined acute renal failure and fulminant hepatic failure. Kidney Int 43:S245–S251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ricci Z, Ronco C (2008) Dose and efficiency of renal replacement therapy: continuous renal replacement therapy versus intermittent hemodialysis versus slow extended daily dialysis. Crit Care Med 36:S229–S237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark WR, Mueller BA, Alaka KJ, Macias VL (1994) A comparison of metabolic control by continuous and intermittent therapies in acute renal lailure. J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1113–1120Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL (2004) Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med 32:858–873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ronco C, Bellomo R, Homel P, Brendolan A, Dan M, Piccinni P, La Greca G (2000) Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trial. Lancet 356:26–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Saudan P, Niederberger M, De Seigneux S, Romand J, Pugin J, Perneger T, Martin PY (2006) Adding a dialysis dose to continuous hemofiltration increases survival in patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int 70:1312–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Naka T, Bellomo R (2004) Bench-to-bedside review: treating acid–base abnormalities in the intensive care unit—the role of renal replacement therapy. Crit Care 8:108–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Uchino S, Bellomo R, Ronco C (2001) Intermittent versus continous renal replacement therapy in the ICU: impact on electrolyte and acid–base balance. Intensive Care Med 27:1037–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Phu NH, Hien TT, Mai NT, Chau TT, Chuong LV, Loc PP, Winearls C, Farrar J, White N, Day N (2002) Hemofitlration and peritoneal dialysis in infection-associated acute renal failure in Vietnam. N Engl J Med 347:895–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rocktaschel J, Morimatsu H, Uchino S, Ronco C, Bellomo R (2003) Impact of continuous veno-venous hemofiltration on acidbase balance. Int J Artif Organs 26:19–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mehta RL, McDonald B, Gabbai FB, Pahl M, Pascual MT, Farkas A, Kaplan RM, Collaborative Group for Treatment of ARF in the ICU (2001) A randomized clinical trial of continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute renal failure. Kidney Int 60:1154–1163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Uehlinger DE, Jakob SM, Ferrari P, Eichelberger M, Huynh-Do U, Marti HP, Mohaupt MG, Vogt B, Rothen HU, Regli B, Takala J, Frey FJ (2005) Comparison of continuous and intermittent renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure. Nephrol Dial Transplant 20:1630–1637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Augustine JJ, Sandy D, Seifert TH, Paganini EP (2004) A randomized controlled trial comparing intermittent with continuous dialysis in patients with ARF. Am J Kidney Dis 44:1000–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vinsonneau C, Camus C, Combes A, Costa de Beauregard MA, Klouche K, Boulain T, Pallot JL, Chiche JD, Taupin P, Landais P, Dhainaut JF, For the Hemodiafe Study Group (2006) Continuous venovenous haemodiafi ltration versus intermittent haemodialysis for acute renal failure in patients with multiple-organ dysfunction syndrome: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 368:379–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cho KC, Himmelfarb J, Paganini E, Ikizler TA, Soroko SH, Mehta RL, Chertow GM (2006) Survival by dialysis modality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 17:3132–3138PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kellum J, Palevsky P (2006) Renal support in acute kidney injury. Lancet 368:344–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pannu N, Klarenbach S, Wiebe N, Manns B, Tonelli M, Alberta Kidney Disease Network (2008) Renal replacement therapy in patients with acute renal failure: a systematic review. JAMA 299:793–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bagshaw SM, Berthiaume LR, Delaney A, Bellomo R (2008) Continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 36:610–617PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rabindranath K, Adams J, Macleod AM, Muirhead N (2007) Intermittent versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD003773Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kielstein JT, Kretschmer U, Ernst T, Hafer C, Bahr MJ, Haller H, Fliser D (2004) Efficacy and cardiovascular tolerability of extended dialysis in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled study. Am J Kidney Dis 43:342–349PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baldwin I, Naka T, Koch B, Fealy N, Bellomo R (2007) A pilot randomised controlled comparison of continuous veno-venous haemofiltration and extended daily dialysis with filtration: effect on small solutes and acid–base balance. Intensive Care Med 33:830–835PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schortgen F, Soubrier N, Delclaux C, Thuong M, Girou E, Brun-Buisson C, Lemaire F, Brochard L (2000) Hemodynamic tolerance of intermittent hemodialysis in critically ill patients: usefulness of practice guidelines. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:197–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Himmelfarb J (2007) Continuous dialysis is not superior to intermittent dialysis in acute kidney injury of the critically ill patient. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol 3:120–121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tolwani AJ, Campbell RC, Stofan BS, Lai KR, Oster RA, Wille KM (2008) Standard versus high-dose CVVHDF for ICU-related acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 19:1233–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    The VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network (2008) Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med 359:7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Bouman CS, Oudemans-Van Straaten HM, Tijssen JG, Zandstra DF, Kesecioglu J (2002) Effects of early high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal function in intensive care patients with acute renal failure: a prospective, randomized trial. Crit Care Med 30:2205–2211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bonventre JV (2008) Dialysis in acute kidney injury—more is not better. N Engl J Med 359:82–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Oudemans van Straaten HM (2007) Primum non nocere, safety of continuous renal replacement therapy. Curr Opin Crit Care 13:635–637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gorbet MB, Sefton MV (2004) Biomaterial-associated thrombosis: roles of coagulation factors, complement, platelets and leukocytes. Biomaterials 25:5681–5703PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gritters M, Grooteman MP, Schoorl M, Schoorl M, Bartels PC, Scheffer PG, Teerlink T, Schalkwijk CG, Spreeuwenberg M, Nubé MJ (2006) Citrate anticoagulation abolishes degranulation of polymorphonuclear cells and platelets and reduces oxidative stress during haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:153–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wooley JA, Btaiche IF, Good KL (2005) Metabolic and nutritional aspects of acute renal failure in critically ill Patients Requiring Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy. Nutr in Clin Pract 20:176–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Story DA, Ronco C, Bellomo R (1999) Trace element and vitamin concentrations and losses in critically ill patients treated with continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Crit Care Med 27:220–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Suchner U, Berger MM (2005) Antioxidant nutrients: a systematic review of trace elements and vitamins in the critically ill patient. Intensive Care Med 31:327–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cole L, Bellomo R, Baldwin I, Hayhoe M, Ronco C (2003) The impact of lactate buffered high volume hemofiltraiton on acid base balance. Intensive Care Med 29:1113–1120PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bollmann MD, Revelly JP, Tappy L, Berger MM, Schaller MD, Cayeux MC, Martinez A, Chioléro RL (2004) Effect of bicarbonate and lactate buffer on glucose and lactate metabolism during hemodiafiltration in patients with multiple organ failure. Intensive Care Med 30:1103–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vidal L, Shavit M, Fraser A, Paul M, Leibovici L (2005) Systematic comparison of four sources of drug information regarding adjustment of dose for renal function. BMJ 331:263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Trotman RL, Williamson JC, Shoemaker DM, Salzer WL (2005) Antibiotic dosing in critically ill adult patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy. Clin Infect Dis 41:1159–1166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bouman CS, van Kan HJ, Koopmans RP, Korevaar JC, Schultz MJ, Vroom MB (2006) Discrepancies between observed and predicted continuous veno venous hemofiltration removal of antimicrobial agents in critically ill patients and the effect of dosing. Intensive Care Med 32:2013–2019PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Uchino S, Cole L, Morimatsu H, Goldsmith D, Bellomo R (2002) Clearance of vancomycin during high volume hemofiltration: impact of pre-dilution. Intensive Care Med 28:1664–1667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    John S, Griesbach D, Baumgartel M, Weihprecht H, Schmieder RE, Geiger H (2001) Effects of continuous haemofiltration vs intermittent haemodialysis on systemic haemodynamics and splanchnic regional perfusion in septic shock patients: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:320–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Rogiers P, Sun Q, Dimopoulos G, Tu Z, Pauwels D, Manhaeghe C, Su F, Vincent JL (2006) Bloodwarming during hemofiltration can improve hemodynamics and outcome in ovine septic shock. Anesthesiology 104:1216–1222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ricci Z, Bonello M, Salvatori G, Ratanarat R, Brendolan A, Dan M, Ronco C (2004) Continuous renal replacement technology: from adaptive technology and early dedicated machines towards flexible multipurpose machine platforms. Blood Purif 22:269–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ronco C, Ricci Z, Bellomo R, Baldwin I, Kellum J (2005) Management of fluid balance in CRRT: a technical approach. Int J Artif Organs 28:765–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shaheen IS, Harvey B, Watson AR, Pandya HC, Mayer A, Thomas D (2007) Continuous venovenous hemofiltration with or without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 8:362–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ricci Z, Morelli S, Vitale V, Di Chiara L, Cruz D, Picardo S (2007) Management of fluid balance in continuous renal replacement therapy: technical evaluation in the pediatric setting. Int J Artif Organs 30:896–901PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and TransplantationS.Bortolo HospitalVicenzaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Pediatric CardiosurgeryBambino Gesù HospitalRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations