Advertisement

Intensive Care Medicine

, 34:2010 | Cite as

Physiologic response to varying levels of pressure support and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in patients with acute respiratory failure

  • Davide Colombo
  • Gianmaria Cammarota
  • Valentina Bergamaschi
  • Marta De Lucia
  • Francesco Della Corte
  • Paolo NavalesiEmail author
Original

Abstract

Objective

Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a new mode wherein the assistance is provided in proportion to diaphragm electrical activity (EAdi). We assessed the physiologic response to varying levels of NAVA and pressure support ventilation (PSV).

Setting

ICU of a University Hospital.

Patients

Fourteen intubated and mechanically ventilated patients.

Design and protocol

Cross-over, prospective, randomized controlled trial. PSV was set to obtain a V t/kg of 6–8 ml/kg with an active inspiration. NAVA was matched with a dedicated software. The assistance was decreased and increased by 50% with both modes. The six assist levels were randomly applied.

Measurements

Arterial blood gases (ABGs), tidal volume (V t/kg), peak EAdi, airway pressure (Paw), neural and flow-based timing. Asynchrony was calculated using the asynchrony index (AI).

Results

There was no difference in ABGs regardless of mode and assist level. The differences in breathing pattern, ventilator assistance, and respiratory drive and timing between PSV and NAVA were overall small at the two lower assist levels. At the highest assist level, however, we found greater V t/kg (9.1 ± 2.2 vs. 7.1 ± 2 ml/kg, P < 0.001), and lower breathing frequency (12 ± 6 vs. 18 ± 8.2, P < 0.001) and peak EAdi (8.6 ± 10.5 vs. 12.3 ± 9.0, P < 0.002) in PSV than in NAVA; we found mismatch between neural and flow-based timing in PSV, but not in NAVA. AI exceeded 10% in five (36%) and no (0%) patients with PSV and NAVA, respectively (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Compared to PSV, NAVA averted the risk of over-assistance, avoided patient–ventilator asynchrony, and improved patient–ventilator interaction.

Keywords

Mechanical ventilation Patient–ventilator interaction Diaphragm electrical activity Pressure support ventilation Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Maquet Critical Care that provided us with all the equipment used for the study. We are indebted to Jeffrey Franc-Law who carefully revised the manuscript. Last but not least, we wish to acknowledge all physicians and nurses of our Intensive Care Unit for their helpful and continuous support.

References

  1. 1.
    Younes M (1991) Proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation: similarities and differences. In: Marini J, Roussos C (eds) Ventilatory failure. Springer, Berlin, pp 361–380Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chao DC, Scheinhorn DJ, Stearn-Hassenpflug M (1997) Patient–ventilator trigger asynchrony in prolonged mechanical ventilation. Chest 112:1592–1599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Thille AW, Rodriguez P, Cabello B, Lellouche F, Brochard L (2006) Patient–ventilator asynchrony during assisted mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 32:1515–1522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cereda M, Foti G, Marcora B, Gili M, Giacomini M, Sparacino ME, Pesenti A (2000) Pressure support ventilation in patients with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 28:1269–1275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nava S, Bruschi C, Fracchia C, Braschi A, Rubini F (1997) Patient-ventilator interaction and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in patients with different pathologies. Eur Respir J 10:177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Younes M, Kun J, Webster K, Roberts D (2002) Response of ventilator-dependent patients to delayed opening of exhalation valve. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:21–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leung P, Jubran A, Tobin MJ (1997) Comparison of assisted ventilator modes on triggering, patient effort, and dyspnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:1940–1948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Younes M, Puddy A, Roberts D, Light RB, Quesada A, Taylor K, Oppenheimer L, Cramp H (1992) Proportional assist ventilation. Results of an initial clinical trial. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:121–129PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Giannouli E, Webster KIM, Roberts DAN, Younes M (1999) Response of ventilator-dependent patients to different levels of pressure support and proportional assist. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:1716–1725PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nava S, Bruschi C, Rubini F, Palo A, Iotti G, Braschi A (1995) Respiratory response and inspiratory effort during pressure support ventilation in COPD patients. Intensive Care Med 21:871–879PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Appendini L, Purro A, Patessio A, Zanaboni S, Carone M, Spada E, Donner CF, Rossi A (1996) Partitioning of inspiratory muscle workload and pressure assistance in ventilator-dependent COPD patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:1301–1309PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sinderby C, Navalesi P, Beck J, Skrobik Y, Comtois N, Friberg S, Gottfried SB, Lindstrom L (1999) Neural control of mechanical ventilation in respiratory failure. Nat Med 5:1433–1436PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Navalesi P, Costa R (2003) New modes of mechanical ventilation: proportional assist ventilation, neurally adjusted ventilatory assist, and fractal ventilation. Curr Opin Crit Care 9:51–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gattinoni L, Caironi P, Cressoni M, Chiumello D, Ranieri VM, Quintel M, Russo S, Patroniti N, Cornejo R, Bugedo G (2006) Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 354:1775–1786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sinderby C, Beck J, Spahija J, de Marchie M, Lacroix J, Navalesi P, Slutsky AS (2007) Inspiratory muscle unloading by neurally adjusted ventilatory assist during maximal inspiratory efforts in healthy subjects. Chest 131:711–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aldrich T, Sinderby C, McKenzie D (2002) Electrophysiologic techniques for the assessment of respiratory muscle function. In: ATS/ERS (eds) Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:518–624Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Allo JC, Beck JC, Brander L, Brunet F, Slutsky AS, Sinderby CA (2006) Influence of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist and positive end-expiratory pressure on breathing pattern in rabbits with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 34:2997–3004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Foti G, Cereda M, Banfi G, Pelosi P, Fumagalli R, Pesenti A (1997) End-inspiratory airway occlusion: a method to assess the pressure developed by inspiratory muscles in patients with acute lung injury undergoing pressure support. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156:1210–1216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    (2006) Ventilate with NAVA. In: AB MCC (eds) SERVO-I V32 NAVA ventilation, user’s manualGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fauroux B, Isabey D, Desmarais G, Brochard L, Harf A, Lofaso F (1998) Nonchemical influence of inspiratory pressure support on inspiratory activity in humans. J Appl Physiol 85:2169–2175PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramsay MA, Savege TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R (1974) Controlled sedation with alphaxalone–alphadolone. Br Med J 2:656–659PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tobin MJ, Mador MJ, Guenther SM, Lodato RF, Sackner MA (1988) Variability of resting respiratory drive and timing in healthy subjects. J Appl Physiol 65:309–317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wrigge H, Golisch W, Zinserling J, Sydow M, Almeling G, Burchardi H (1999) Proportional assist versus pressure support ventilation: effects on breathing pattern and respiratory work of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Intensive Care Med 25:790–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vitacca M, Bianchi L, Zanotti E, Vianello A, Barbano L, Porta R, Clini E (2004) Assessment of physiologic variables and subjective comfort under different levels of pressure support ventilation. Chest 126:851–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Berger KI, Sorkin IB, Norman RG, Rapoport DM, Goldring RM (1996) Mechanism of relief of tachypnea during pressure support ventilation. Chest 109:1320–1327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ambrosino N (1999) Apples and oranges. Comparing different modalities of mechanical ventilation. Intensive Care Med 25:775–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamada Y, Du HL (2000) Analysis of the mechanisms of expiratory asynchrony in pressure support ventilation: a mathematical approach. J Appl Physiol 88:2143–2150PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sassoon CS, Foster GT (2001) Patient–ventilator asynchrony. Curr Opin Crit Care 7:28–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kondili E, Prinianakis G, Anastasaki M, Georgopoulos D (2001) Acute effects of ventilator settings on respiratory motor output in patients with acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 27:1147–1157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davide Colombo
    • 1
  • Gianmaria Cammarota
    • 1
  • Valentina Bergamaschi
    • 1
  • Marta De Lucia
    • 1
  • Francesco Della Corte
    • 1
  • Paolo Navalesi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “A. Avogadro”, SCDU Anestesia, Terapia Intensiva e Rianimazione Generale, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria “Maggiore della Carità”NovaraItaly

Personalised recommendations