Monitoring of intracranial pressure in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: an Austrian prospective multicenter study
- 431 Downloads
The goals of this study were to elucidate reasons why patients did or did not receive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring and to describe factors influencing hospital mortality after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Prospective multicenter cohort study.
Patients and participants
88,274 patients consecutively admitted to 32 medical, surgical and mixed Austrian ICUs between 1998 and 2004.
Measurements and results
1,856 patients (2.1% of all ICU admissions) exhibited severe TBI (GCS < 9); of these, 1,031 (56%) had ICP monitoring. The “worst” and the “best” cases were both less likely to receive ICP monitoring. Younger patients, female patients, and patients with isolated TBI were more likely to receive ICP monitoring. Compared with large centers ICP was monitored more frequently [odds ratio (OR) 3.09, CI 2.42–3.94] in medium-sized centers. The 20% of patients with the highest likelihood to receive ICP monitoring were monitored in 91% of cases, and had the lowest hospital mortality (31%, OR 0.78, CI 0.37–1.64). Multivariate analysis revealed that severity of illness, TBI severity, isolated TBI, and the number of cases treated per year were associated with hospital outcome. Compared with the large centers, ORs for hospital mortality were 1.85 (CI 1.42–2.40) for patients from medium-sized centers and 1.91 (CI 1.24–2.93) for patients from small centers.
ICP monitoring may possibly have some beneficial effects, but this needs further evaluation. Patients with severe TBI should be admitted to experienced centers with high patient volumes since this might improve hospital mortality rates.
KeywordsTraumatic brain injury Intracranial pressure Mortality Glasgow Coma Scale Abbreviated Injury Score
We thank the members of the ASDI study group and their respective study coordinators in each ICU: H. Artmann, A. Bacher, T. Bauer, G. Derzsenyi, K. Dörre, G. Edelmann, I. Eder, F. Ernst, F. Firlinger, S. Fitzal, H. Fresacher, A. Geppert, G. Halvax, M. Hiesmayr, K. Hudabiunigg, W. Hufnagl, T, Janous, S. Klaunzer, W. Klimscha, G. Koinig, D. Krucher, K. Lampl, D. Linemayr, S. Lister, G. Locker, C. Madl, H. Malle, W. Mauritz, G. Naderer, U. Ortler, B. Pichler, W. Regal, G. Sagmüller, I. Schindler, H. Schneller, F. Schwameis, E. Seyfried, G. Sprinzl, F. Tichelmann, H. Trimmel, A. Valentin, H. Vesely, F. Wimmer, P. Zanon, and M. Zeilinger. This study was supported, in part, by a grant from AUVA (Allgemeine Unfallversicherungsanstalt).
- 1.The Brain Trauma Foundation (2007) The American Association of Neurological Surgeons. Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines for the management of severe brain trauma. J Neurotrauma 24 (Suppl 1):S1–S106Google Scholar
- 2.American Association for the Surgery of Trauma, Child Neurology Society, International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, International Trauma Anesthesia and Critical Care Society, Society of Critical Care Medicine, World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Synthes USA, International Brain Injury Association (2003) Guidelines for the acute medical management of severe traumatic brain injury in infants, children, and adolescents. J Trauma 54(6 Suppl):235–310Google Scholar
- 3.Procaccio F, Stocchetti N, Citerio G, Berardino M, Beretta L, Della Corte F, D'Avella D, Brambilla GL, Delfini R, Servadei F, Tomei G (2000) Guidelines for the treatment of adults with severe head trauma (part I). Initial assessment; evaluation and pre-hospital treatment; current criteria for hospital admission; systemic and cerebral monitoring. J Neurosurg Sci 44:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Stocchetti N, Penny KI, Dearden M, Braakman R, Cohadon F, Iannotti F, Lapierre F, Karimi A, Maas A Jr, Murray GD, Ohman J, Persson L, Servadei F, Teasdale GM, Trojanowski T, Unterberg A, European Brain Injury Consortium (2001) Intensive care management of head-injured patients in Europe: a survey from the European brain injury consortium. Intensive Care Med 27:400–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.ASDI: see http://www.asdi.at
- 18.Thompson HJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Wang J, Nathens AB, Mackenzie EJ (2008) Evaluation of the effect of intensity of care on mortality after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 36:282–290Google Scholar
- 22.Hyam JA, Welch CA, Harrison DA, Menon DK (2006) Case mix, outcomes and comparison of risk prediction models for admissions to adult, general and specialist critical care units for head injury: a secondary analysis of the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care 10(Suppl 2):S2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Marshall LF, Maas AI, Marshall SB, Bricolo A, Fearnside M, Iannotti F, Klauber MR, Lagarrigue J, Lobato R, Persson L, Pickard JD, Piek J, Servadei F, Wellis GN, Morris GF, Means ED, Musch B (1998) A multicenter trial on the efficacy of using tirilazad mesylate in cases of head injury. J Neurosurg 89:519–525PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Maas AI, Murray G, Henney H III, Kassem N, Legrand V, Mangelus M, Muizelaar JP, Stocchetti N, Knoller N, Pharmos TBI investigators (2006) Efficacy and safety of dexanabinol in severe traumatic brain injury: results of a phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Lancet Neurol 5:38–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Lu J, Marmarou A, Choi S, Maas A, Murray G, Steyerberg EW, Impact and Abic Study Group (2005) Mortality from traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir 95(Suppl):281–285Google Scholar