Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 33, Issue 8, pp 1407–1413 | Cite as

Pediatric Index of Mortality 2 score in Italy: a multicenter, prospective, observational study

  • Andrea Wolfler
  • Paolo Silvani
  • Massimo Musicco
  • Ida Salvo
  • Italian Pediatric Sepsis Study (SISPe) Group
Pediatric Original

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the performance of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM) 2 score in Italian pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).

Design

Prospective, observational, multicenter, 1-year study.

Setting

Eighteen medical–surgical PICUs.

Patients

Consecutive patients (3266) aged 0–16 years admitted between 1 March 2004 and 28 February 2005.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and main results

To assess the performance of the PIM2 score, discrimination and calibration measures were applied to all children admitted to the 18 PICUs, in the entire population and in different groups divided for deciles of risk, age and admission diagnosis. There was good discrimination, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.89 (95% CI 0.86–0.91) and good calibration of the scoring system [non-significant differences between observed and predicted deaths when the population was stratified according to deciles of risk (χ2 9.86; 8 df, p = 0.26) for the whole population].

Conclusions

The PIM2 score performed well in this sample of the Italian pediatric intensive care population. It may need to be reassessed in the injury and postoperative groups in larger studies.

Keywords

Pediatric intensive care unit Severity score Mortality Pediatric index of Mortality Children 

References

  1. 1.
    Tilford JM, Roberson PK, Lensing S, Fiser DH (1998) Differences in pediatric ICU mortality risk over time. Crit Care Med 26:1737–1743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pollack MM, Cuerdon TC, Getson PR (1993) Pediatric intensive care units: results of a national survey. Crit Care Med 21:607–613PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gemke RJBJ, Bonsel GJ (1995) Comparative assessment of pediatric intensive care: A national multicenter study. Crit Care Med 23:238–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slater A, Shann F, for the Anzics Paediatric Study Group (2004) The suitability of the Pediatric Index of Mortality (PIM), PIM2, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM), and PRISM III for monitoring the quality of pediatric intensive care in Australia and New Zealand. Pediatr Crit Care Med 5:447–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bertolini G, Ripamonti D, Cattaneo A, Apolone G (1998) Pediatric Risk of Mortality: an assessment of its performance in a sample of 26 Italian intensive care units. Crit Care Med 26:1427–1432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR (1988) Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med 16:1110–1116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pollack MM, Patel KM, Ruttimann UE (1996) PRISM III: an updated Pediatric Risk of Mortality score. Crit Care Med 24:743–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shann F, Pearson G, Slater A, Wilkinson K (1997) Paediatric index of mortality (PIM): a mortality prediction model for children in intensive care. Intensive Care Med 23:201–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Slater A, Shann F, Pearson G for the PIM Study Group (2003) PIM2: a revised version of the Paediatric Index of Mortality. Intensive Care Med 29:278–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brady AR, Harrison D, Black S, Jones S, Rowan K, Pearson G, Ratcliffe J, Parry GJ, on behalf of the UK PICOS Study Group (2006) Assessment and optimization of a mortality prediction tool for admission to pediatric intensive care in the United Kingdom. Pediatrics 117:e733–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van Keulen JG, Gemke RJBJ, Polderman KH (2005) Effect of training and strict guidelines on the reliability of risk adjustment systems in paediatric intensive care. Intensive Care Med 31:1229–1234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A and the Members of the International Consensus Conference on Pediatric Sepsis (2005) International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatr Crit Care Med 6:2–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Miettinen OS (1976) Estimability and estimation in case-referent studies. Am J Epidemiol 103:226–235PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Frey B, Argent A (2004) Safe paediatric intensive care. 1. Does more medical care lead to improved outcome? Intensive Care Med 30:1041–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Frey B, Argent A (2004) Safe paediatric intensive care. 2. Workplace organisation, critical incident monitoring and guidelines. Intensive Care Med 30:1292–1297PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rosenberg DJ, Moss MM (2004) American College of Critical Care Medicine of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines and levels of care for pediatric intensive care units. Crit Care Med 32:2117–2127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kanter RK (2002) Regional variation in child mortality at hospitals lacking a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 30:94–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pearson G, Shann F, Barry P, Vyas J, Thomas D, Powell C, Field D (1997) Should paediatric intensive care be centralised? Trent versus Victoria. Lancet 349:1213–1217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bonati M, Campi R (2005) What can we do to improve child health in southern Italy? PLoS Med 2:e250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tibby SM, Taylor D, Festa M, Hanna S, Hatherill M, Jones G, Habibi P, Durward A, Murdoch IA (2002) A comparison of three scoring systems for mortality risk among retrieved intensive care patients. Arch Dis Child 87:421–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nipshagen MD, Polderman KH, De Victor D, Gemke RJ (2002) Pediatric intensive care: result of a European survey. Intensive Care Med 28:1797–803PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mestrovic J, Kardum G, Polic B, Omazic A, Stricevic L, Sustic A (2005) Applicability of the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care Registry diagnostic codes and Paediatric Index of Mortality 2 scoring system in a Croatian paediatric intensive care unit. Eur J Pediatr 164:783–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrea Wolfler
    • 1
  • Paolo Silvani
    • 1
  • Massimo Musicco
    • 2
  • Ida Salvo
    • 1
  • Italian Pediatric Sepsis Study (SISPe) Group
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Children’s Hospital Vittore BuzziIstituti Clinici di PerfezionamentoMilanItaly
  2. 2.National Research Council, Institute of Biomedical TechnologiesIRCCS “Fondazione Santa Lucia”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations