Urinary biomarkers in septic acute kidney injury
- First Online:
To appraise the literature on the value of urinary biomarkers in septic acute kidney injury (AKI).
Academic medical centre.
Patients and participants
Human studies of urinary biomarkers.
Measurements and results
Fourteen articles fulfilled inclusion criteria. Most studies were small, single-centre, and included mixed medical/surgical adult populations. Few focused solely on septic AKI and all had notable limitations. Retrieved articles included data on low-molecular-weight proteins (β2-microglobulin, α1-microglobulin, adenosine deaminase binding protein, retinol binding protein, cystatin C, renal tubular epithelial antigen-1), enzymes (N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, alanine-aminopeptidase, alkaline phosphatase; lactate dehydrogenase, α/π-glutathione-S-transferase, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase), cytokines [platelet activating factor (PAF), interleukin-18 (IL-18)] and other biomarkers [kidney injury molecule-1, Na/H exchanger isoform-3 (NHE3)]. Increased PAF, IL-18, and NHE3 were detected early in septic AKI and preceded overt kidney failure. Several additional biomarkers were evident early in AKI; however, their diagnostic value in sepsis remains unknown. In one study, IL-18 excretion was higher in septic than in non-septic AKI. IL-18 also predicted deterioration in kidney function, with increased values preceding clinically significant kidney failure by 24–48 h. Detection of cystatin C, α1-microglobulin, and IL-18 predicted need for renal replacement therapy (RRT).
Few clinical studies of urinary biomarkers in AKI have included septic patients. However, there is promising evidence that selected biomarkers may aid in the early detection of AKI in sepsis and may have value for predicting subsequent deterioration in kidney function. Additional prospective studies are needed to accurately describe their diagnostic and prognostic value in septic AKI.
KeywordsAcute kidney injury Acute renal failure Sepsis Urinary biomarkers Renal replacement therapy Interleukin-18
- 6.Yegenaga I, Hoste E, Van Biesen W, Vanholder R, Benoit D, Kantarci G, Dhondt A, Colardyn F, Lameire N (2004) Clinical characteristics of patients developing ARF due to sepsis/systemic inflammatory response syndrome: results of a prospective study. Am J Kidney Dis 43:817–824PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Tolkoff-Rubin NE, Thompson RE, Piper DJ, Hansen WP, Bander NH, Cordon-Cardo C, Finstad CJ, Klotz LH, Old LJ, Rubin RH (1987) Diagnosis of renal proximal tubular injury by urinary immunoassay for a proximal tubular antigen, the adenosine deaminase binding protein. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2:143–148PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 34.Ichimura T, Bonventre JV, Bailly V, Wei H, Hession CA, Cate RL, Sanicola M (1998) Kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), a putative epithelial cell adhesion molecule containing a novel immunoglobulin domain, is up-regulated in renal cells after injury. J Biol Chem 273:4135–4142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Bouman CSC, Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Tijssen JGP, Zandstra DF, Kesecioglu J (2002) Effects of early high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal function in intensive care patients with acute renal failure: A prospective, randomized trial. Critical Care Medicine 30:2205–2211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar