Echocardiographic prediction of volume responsiveness in critically ill patients with spontaneously breathing activity
- 1.7k Downloads
In hemodynamically unstable patients with spontaneous breathing activity, predicting volume responsiveness is a difficult challenge since the respiratory variation in arterial pressure cannot be used. Our objective was to test whether volume responsiveness can be predicted by the response of stroke volume measured with transthoracic echocardiography to passive leg raising in patients with spontaneous breathing activity. We also examined whether common echocardiographic indices of cardiac filling status are valuable to predict volume responsiveness in this category of patients.
Design and setting
Prospective study in the medical intensive care unit of a university hospital.
24 patients with spontaneously breathing activity considered for volume expansion.
We measured the response of the echocardiographic stroke volume to passive leg raising and to saline infusion (500 ml over 15 min). The left ventricular end-diastolic area and the ratio of mitral inflow E wave velocity to early diastolic mitral annulus velocity (E/Ea) were also measured before and after saline infusion.
A passive leg raising induced increase in stroke volume of 12.5% or more predicted an increase in stroke volume of 15% or more after volume expansion with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 100%. Neither left ventricular end-diastolic area nor E/Ea predicted volume responsiveness.
In our critically ill patients with spontaneous breathing activity the response of echocardiographic stroke volume to passive leg raising was a good predictor of volume responsiveness. On the other hand, the common echocardiographic markers of cardiac filling status were not valuable for this purpose.
KeywordsVolume responsiveness Passive leg raising Stroke volume Echocardiography Cardiac preload Spontaneous breathing
- 1.Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Ommen SR, Nishimura RA, Appleton CP, Miller FA, Oh JK, Redfield MM, Tajik AJ (2000) Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography and tissue Doppler imaging in the estimation of left ventricular filling pressures. A comparative simultaneous Doppler catheterization study. Circulation 102:1788–1794PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Teboul JL, Monnet X, Richard C (2005) Arterial pulse pressure variation during positive pressure ventilation and passive leg raising. In: Pinsky MR, Payen D (eds) Functional hemodynamic monitoring, 1st edn. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 331–343Google Scholar
- 22.Lattik R, Couture P, Denault AY, Carrier M, Harel F, Taillefer J, Tardif JC (2002) Mitral Doppler indices are superior to two-dimensional echocardiographic and hemodynamic variables in predicting responsiveness of cardiac output to a rapid intravenous infusion of colloid. Anesth Analg 94:1092–1099PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Braunwald E, Sonnenblick EH, Ross J (1988) Mechanisms of cardiac contraction and relaxation. In: Braunwald E (ed) Heart disease. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 383–425Google Scholar