Determination of functional residual capacity by oxygen washin-washout: a validation study
- 139 Downloads
To validate a new system for functional residual capacity (FRC) measurements using oxygen washin/washout in spontaneously breathing humans. The system (LUFU, Drägerwerk AG, Lübeck, Germany) consists of an unmodified EVITA 4 ventilator, a side-stream paramagnetic oxygen sensor and a dedicated software.
Laboratory study and measurements in spontaneously breathing volunteers.
Pulmonary function laboratory of a university hospital.
20 healthy and 15 lung diseased volunteers.
FRC was measured by LUFU (LUFU-FRC) and by helium dilution (He-FRC); intra-thoracic gas volume (ITGV) was determined by body plethysmography. Each measurement cycle consisted of four independent LUFU-FRC determinations (step change of FiO2 from 0.21 to 0.5 and back and from 0.21 to 1.0 and back), two helium-dilution runs and two body box measurements. Repeatability and agreement between methods were determined by comparing different measurements of one technique and by comparing different techniques among each other.
Measurements and results
Repeatability of LUFU-FRC was estimated by comparing washin to washout and the different FiO2steps. The difference of the means was 3.7% at the most. Agreement between methods resulted in the following differences (mean ± standard deviation of differences) for healthy and lung-diseased volunteers, respectively: LUFU-FRC vs. He-FRC –0.40 ± 0.50 L (0.02 ± 0.95 L), LUFU-FRC vs. ITGV –0.43 ± 0.54 L (–0.18 ± 0.61 L) and He-FRC vs. ITGV –0.03 ± 0.43 L (–0.20 ± 0.98 L).
LUFU is a non-invasive method for the determination of FRC that requires only minor additional equipment and no modification to the ventilator. It can be used in difficult conditions such as breathing patterns with variations from breath to breath. The results of this study show that LUFU is sufficiently reliable and repeatable to warrant its clinical application.
KeywordsOxygen washin-washout Functional residual capacity Helium dilution method Body plethysmography
- 8.Hildebrand H, Islam MS, Ulmer WT (1984) Comparison between body plethysmographic measurement of the intrathoracic gas volume and oscillatory measurement of the functional residual air capacity in healthy volunteers, miners with and without obstruction of the airways and in patients not exposed to dust but with obstructive airways disease. Prax Klin Pneumol 38:217–219PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Quanjer PH, Tammeling GJ, Cotes JE, Pedersen OF, Peslin R, Yernault JC (1993) Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows. Report of the Working Party on Standardization of Lung Function Tests. European Community for Steel and Coal. Official statement of the European Respiratory Society. Eur Respir J 6(Suppl 16):5–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Germouty J, Charruyer-Latrille G, Boyer M, Charles A, Jaubert A, Chatelut J, Chantegreil D, Germouty C (1970) La mesure de la capacité résiduelle fonctionelle. Comparaison de trois méthodes: Spirographique, radiographique et plethysmographique chez 100 adultes normaux. Poumon 26:589–594Google Scholar
- 16.Olegard C, Söndergaard S, Houltz E, Lundin S, Stenqvist O (2005) Estimation of functional residual capacity at the bedside using standard monitoring equipment: a modified nitrogen washout/washin technique requiring a small change of the inspired oxygen fraction. Anesth Analg 101:206–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar