Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 32, Issue 12, pp 2049–2052 | Cite as

The Nuremberg doctors' trial: the 60th anniversary

Legal and Ethical Issues in Clinical Research

Supplementary material

134_2006_467_MOESM1_ESM.doc (26 kb)
Electronic Supplementary Material (DOC 27K)

References

  1. 1.
    Katz J (1992) The consent principle of the Nuremberg code: its significance then and now. In: Annas G, Grodin M (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 227–239Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Taylor T (1946) Opening statement of the prosecution, December 9, 1946. In: Annas G, Grodin M (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 67–93Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berger R (1990) Nazi science; the Dachau hypothermia experiments. New England J Medicine 322:1435–1440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmidt U (2004) Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors' trial. St Antony's Series. Palgrave; MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grodin M (1992) Historical origin of the Nuremberg code. In: Annas G, Grodin M (eds) The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg code. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 121–144Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vollmann J, Winau R (1996) Informed consent in human experimentation before the Nuremberg code. BMJ 313:1445–1447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shuster E (1997) Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code. N Engl J Med 337:1436–1440PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weindling P (1996) Human guinea pigs and the ethics of experimentation: the BMJ's correspondent at the Nuremberg medical trial. BMJ 313:1467–1470PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Intensive Care UnitHenri Mondor HospitalCreteilFrance

Personalised recommendations