Intensive Care Medicine

, Volume 32, Issue 12, pp 1930–1932

The inability to consent in critical care research: emergency or impairment of cognitive function?

Editorial

References

  1. 1.
    Harvey SE, Elbourne D, Ashcroft J, Jones C, Rowan K (2006) Informed consent in clinical trials in critical care: experience from the PAC-man study. Intensive Care Med DOI 10.1007/s00134-006-0358-4Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harvey S, Harrison DA, Singer M, Ashcroft J, Jones CM, Elbourne D, Brampton W, Williams D, Young D, Rowan K (2005) Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care (PAC-Man): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366:472–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Azoulay E, Pochard F, Chevret S, Jourdain M, Bornstain C, Wernet A, Cattaneo I, Annane D, Brun F, Bollaert P-E, Zahar J-R, Goldgran-Toledano D, Adrie C, Joly L-M, Tayoro J, Desmettre T, Pigne E, Parrot A, Sanchez O, Poisson C, Le Gall J-R, Schlemmer B, Lemaire F (2002) Impact of a family information leaflet on effectiveness of information provided to family members of intensive care unit patients. A multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 165:438–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lemaire F, Bion J, Blanco J, Damas P, Druml C, Falke K, Kesecioglu J, Larsson A, Mancebo J, Matamis D, Pesenti A, Pimentel J, Ranieri M (2005) The EU directive on clinical research: present status of implementation in EU member states legislations with regard to the incompetent patient. Intensive Care Med 31:476–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luce J (2003) California's new law allowing surrogate consent for clinical research involving subjects with impaired decision-making capacity. Intensive Care Med 29:1024–1025PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karlawish JHT (2003) Research involving cognitively impaired adults. N Engl J Med 348:1389–1392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silverman HJ, Luce JM, Schwartz J (2004) Protecting subjects with decisional impairment in research: the need for a multifaceted approach. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 169:10–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coppolino M, Ackerson L (2001) Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research? Chest 119:603–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Upadya A, Muralidharan V, Thorevska N, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous CA (2002) Patient, physician, and family member understanding of living wills. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 166:1430–1435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coats TJ, Shakur H (2005) Consent in emergency research: new regulations. Emerg Med J 22:683–685PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lemaire F (2005) Waiving consent for emergency research. Eur J Clin Invest 35:287–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lötjönen S (2002) Medical research in clinical emergency settings in Europe. J Med Ethics 28:183–187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Federal Register (1996) Protection of human subjects: informed consent and waiver of informed consent in emergency research: final rule. Federal Register 61:51 498–451, 531Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Druml C, Singer EA (2004) The European Directive: a further blow to science in intensive care medicine in Austria. Intensive Care Med 30:335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liddell K, Chamberlain D, Menon DK, Bion J, Kompanje EJO, Lemaire F, Druml C, Vrhovac B, Wiedermann CJ, Sterz F (2006) The European Clinical Trials Directive revisited: the VISEAR recommendations. Resuscitation 69:9–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sterz F, Singer E, Böttiger B, Chamberlain D, Baskett P, Bossaert L, Steen P (2002) A serious threat to evidence based resuscitation within the European Union. Resuscitation 53:237–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Visser H (2001) Non therapeutic research in the EU in adults incapable of giving consent? Lancet 357:818–819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Menon DK, Liddell K (2004) Consent for research. J Intensive Care Soc 5:98–99Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tu JV, Willison DJ, Silver FL, Fang J, Richards JA, Laupacis A, Kapral MK, Investigators in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network (2004) Impracticability of informed consent in the Registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. N Engl J Med 350:1414–1421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kompanje E, Maas A, Hilhorst M, Slieker F, Teasdale G (2005) Ethical considerations on consent procedures for emergency research in severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir 147:633–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crash Trial Management Group (2004) Research in emergency situations: with or without relatives consent. Emerg Med J 21:703CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Annane D, Outin H, Fisch C, Bellissant E (2004) The effect of waiving consent in a sepsis trial. Intensive Care Med 30:321–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Intensive Care Medical UnitHenri Mondor HospitalCreteilFrance

Personalised recommendations