Predictors of early recovery of health status after intensive care
- 263 Downloads
To identify factors predictive of good or poor recovery of health status and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) 90 days after admission to an intensive care unit (ICU).
Design and setting
Prospective international multicentre study in 19 ICUs participating in the HRQOL substudy of the SAPS 3 project.
The EuroQol questionnaire (EQ) was administered to discharged ICU patients 90 days after admission. A question to compare present health status with that 3 months before ICU admission (same/better/worse) was added.
Six hundred and eighteen patients who spent > 24 h in an ICU and survived for 90 days. EQ data and health comparison were available in 559 (90.5%) of them.
Measurements and results
Patients reported their general level of health to be better (33.8%), the same (31.1%), or worse (35.1%) in comparison with baseline. Recovery was considered to be good for answers “better” or “the same”. Regression analysis showed that transplantation surgery [odds ratio (OR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01–0.63], coronary artery bypass surgery without valvular repair (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17–0.92) and being admitted to the ICU from a ward or other location (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.31–0.95) predicted good recovery of health. Predictors of poor recovery (all present at the time of ICU admission) were unplanned ICU admission, hypothermia, serum creatinine level ≥ 2 mg/dl, pH ≤ 7.25 and metastatic cancer.
More than 60% of ICU patients report good recovery of their health 90 days after ICU admission, depending on their illness and circumstances of ICU admission.
KeywordsHealth status Quality of life Intensive care Critical care Outcome
The SAPS 3 project was endorsed in June 2002 by the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM). It received support from the Austrian Centre for Documentation and Quality Assurance in Intensive Care Medicine (ASDI), the Portuguese Society of Intensive Care (SPCI), and the Medical Economics and Research Centre in Sheffield, UK. An unrestricted educational grant from Merck Sharp & Dohme Portugal to the SPCI funded the installation of the Coordination and Communication Centre in Lisbon. iMDsoft (Tel Aviv, Israel), developed and provided free of charge, was the Internet-based data collection software. Statistical analysis was supported by a grant from the Fund of the Austrian National Bank, project 10995 ONB. We thank Eduardo Almeida, who developed the SAPS 3 stand-alone database system, including the variables used in the present substudy. We are grateful to the participating ICUs who made this project possible. We also thank the EuroQol group, who gave us permission to use EQ-5D and provided the appropriate language versions free of charge.
- 3.Curtis JR (2003) Measuring health status after critical illness: where are we and where do we go from here? In: Angus DC, Carlet J (ed) Surviving intensive care. update in intensive care medicine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 181–196Google Scholar
- 4.Metnitz PGH, Moreno RP, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Abizanda Campos R, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall J-R, on behalf of the SAPS 3 Investigators (2005) SAPS 3 – from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the ICU. Part 1. Objectives, methods and cohort description. Intensive Care Med 31:1336–1344 DOI 10.1007/s00134-005-2762-6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Moreno RP, Metnitz PGH, Almeida E, Jordan B, Bauer P, Abizanda Campos R, Iapichino G, Edbrooke D, Capuzzo M, Le Gall J-R, on behalf of the SAPS 3 Investigators (2005) SAPS 3 – from evaluation of the patient to evaluation of the ICU. Part 2. Development of a prognostic model for hospital mortality at ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 31:1345–1355 DOI 10.1007/s00134-005-2763-5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Needham DM, Dowdy DW, Mendez-Tellez PA, Herridge MS, Pronovost PJ (2005) Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors: measuring exposures and outcomes. Intensive Care Med 31:1153–1160 DOI 10.1007/s00134-005-2656-7Google Scholar
- 24.Lindquist R, Dupuis G, Terrin ML, Hoogwerf B, Czajkowski S, Herd JA, Barton FB, Tracy MF, Hunninghake DB, Treat-Jacobson D, Shumaker S, Zyzanski S, Goldenberg I, Knatterud GL; POST CABG Biobehavioral Study Investigators (2003) Comparison of health-related quality-of-life outcomes of men and women after coronary artery bypass surgery through 1 year: findings from the POST CABG Biobehavioral Study. Am Heart J 146:1038–1044PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Sedrakyan A, Mendez-Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Herridge MS, Needham DM (2005) Quality of life in adult survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of the literature. Intensive Care Med 31:611–620 DOI 10.1007/s00134-005-2592-6Google Scholar
- 31.Dowdy DW, Needham DM, Mendez-Tellez PA, Herridge MS, Pronovost PJ (2005) Studying outcomes of intensive care unit survivors: the role of the cohort study. Intensive Care Med 31:914–921 DOI 10.1007/s00134-005-2657-6Google Scholar