Bedside echocardiographic evaluation of hemodynamics in sepsis: is a qualitative evaluation sufficient?
- 673 Downloads
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has proven its efficiency in assessing hemodynamics in patients by its ability to evaluate cardiac function and fluid responsiveness. Classically, it requires quantitative measurements, whereas in routine practice TEE is used in our unit especially as a qualitative procedure. We assessed the accuracy of this qualitative central hemodynamic evaluation obtained by TEE at the bedside.
Design and setting
Prospective study conducted in a medical ICU between September 2004 and April 2005. All TEE examinations performed in consecutive patients hospitalized for septic shock and mechanically ventilated for an associated acute lung injury were eligible for evaluation. Intensivists trained in echocardiography were asked to classify (a) respiratory changes in the superior vena cava (SVC), (b) left ventricular (LV) systolic function, (c) right ventricular (RV) end-diastolic size, and (d) shape and kinetics of the interventricular septum (IVS). A post-hoc quantitative evaluation was then performed by a trained investigator unaware of the patients' status.
We evaluated 83 examinations in 30 patients. Qualitative evaluation was easily able to distinguish patients with significant or nonsignificant SVC respiratory changes, normal, moderately or markedly depressed LV systolic function, and nondilated or dilated right ventricle. Acute cor pulmonale was also well recognized.
By its ability accurately to evaluate hemodynamic status qualitative TEE could be useful for intensivists in managing circulatory failure in septic shock, rendering the more time-consuming quantitative evaluation useless.
KeywordsEchocardiography Septic shock Cardiac function Fluid responsiveness Evaluation
- 4.Practice guidelines for pulmonary artery catheterization. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on pulmonary artery catheterization (1993) Anesthesiology 78:380–394Google Scholar
- 6.Triulzi M, Gerard T, Wilkins G, Gilliam L, Gentile L, Weyman A (1985) Normal adult cross-sectional echocardiographic values: left ventricular volumes. Echocardiography 2:153–1697Google Scholar
- 12.Michard F, Boussat S, Chemla D, Anguel N, Mercat A, Lecarpentier Y, Richard C, Pinsky M, Teboul JL (2000) Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:134–138PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Weyman A (1982) Cross sectional echocardiography. Lea & Fibiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 23.Benjamin E, Griffin K, Leibowitz A, Manasia A, Oropello JM, Geffroy V, DelGiudice R, Hufanda J, Rosen S, Goldman M (1998) Goal-directed transesophageal echocardiography performed by intensivists to assess left ventricular function: comparison with pulmonary artery catheterization. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 12:10–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar