Sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: how is it done in reality? Results of a patient-based survey of analgesia and sedation
- 278 Downloads
This study carried out the first patient-oriented survey on the practice of analgesia and sedation in German intensive care units, examining whether the goals of early spontaneous breathing and awake, cooperative patients are achieved.
A postal survey was sent to 261 hospitals in Germany. Each hospital received three patient-oriented forms with questions regarding current agents and techniques for analgesia and sedation of a specific patient. Responses were obtained from 220 (84%) hospitals which returned 305 questionnaires.
Patients' Ramsay sedation scale was significantly higher in all phases of analgesia and sedation, indicating that the patients were more deeply sedated than currently intended by the therapist. Propofol was used for most of the patients during short-term sedation (57%) and during weaning (48%). The preferred agent for sedation longer than 72 h was midazolam (66%).
The choice of agents and techniques for analgesia and sedation in the intensive care unit thus follows the German guidelines. The fact that the patients were more deeply sedated than intended by the therapist in all phases of sedation may be due to the low use of sedation scales and clinical practice guidelines or to the lack of training in using these techniques.
KeywordsSedation Analgesia Scores Intensive care unit Survey
- 1.Koepke JP (1989) Effect of environmental stress on neural control of renal function. Miner Electrolyte MeTable 15:83–87Google Scholar
- 8.Martin J, Bäsell K, Bürkle H, Hommel J, Huth G, Kessler P, Kretz FJ, Putensen C, Quintel M, Tonner P et al. (2005) Analgesie und Sedierung in der Intensivmedizin-S2-Leitlinien der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin. Anasth Intensivmed 46:1–20Google Scholar
- 19.Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonca A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG (1996) The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 22:707–710PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Andrews P, Azoulay E, Antonelli M, Brochard L, Brun-Buisson C, Dobb G, Fagon JY, Gerlach H, Groeneveld J, Mancebo J et al. (2006) Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2005. II. Infection and sepsis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ethics, haematology and haemostasis, ICU organisation and scoring, brain injury. Intensive Care Med 32:380–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Brodner G, Van Aken H, Hertle L, Fobker M, Von Eckardstein A, Goeters C, Buerkle H, Harks A, Kehlet H (2001) Multimodal perioperative management-combining thoracic epidural analgesia, forced mobilization, and oral nutrition-reduces hormonal and metabolic stress and improves convalescence after major urologic surgery. Anesth Analg 92:1594–1600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Zielmann S, Grote R (1995) Auswirkungen der Langzeitsedierung auf die intestinale Funktion. Anaesthesist 44 Suppl 3:549–558Google Scholar
- 39.Rumbak MJ, Newton M, Truncale T, Schwartz SW, Adams JW, Hazard PB (2004) A prospective, randomized, study comparing early percutaneous dilational tracheotomy to prolonged translaryngeal intubation (delayed tracheotomy) in critically ill medical patients. Crit Care Med 32:1689–1694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Hack G, Götz E, Sorgatz H, van Eimeren W, Wulff A (2000) Umfrage zur Situation der Anästhesiologie in Deutschland. Anasth Intensivmed 41:535–541Google Scholar